WHEN THE MUSIC’S OVER: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE HIPPIE GENERATION

by Anthony Forwood

The following is research based primarily on the work of David McGowan regarding the events taking place in Laurel Canyon during the 1960s.* I’m taking a closer look at some of his underlying claims and the conclusions he has drawn, in order to clarify the facts and improve on the accuracy of understanding about the people and events involved. I will also add further information that relates to secret government programs that might have played a part in the 60s music scene. Readers are recommended to familiarize themselves with McGowan’s work before reading this. My intention here is not to just repeat what McGowan has already said, as so many others have already done. I hope to add more depth to the picture of what was going on during the 1960s, both in and outside of Laurel Canyon, with a primary focus on possible mind-control activities taking place within the music industry.

* See ‘Inside the LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation’, by David MvGowan

PRELIMINARY NOTES

- Lookout Mountain Laboratory was built in Los Angeles’ Laurel Canyon area in 1941 as a secret air defense facility for the US Army. In 1947, it was converted into a top-secret film studio for use in atomic weapons research and other undisclosed projects. The facility remained in operation until at least 1969. Local residents had been completely unaware of its existence until the 1990s.

- Starting in 1945, thousands of Nazi scientists and technicians were secretly transferred to the US under Project Paperclip and put to work in secret military facilities. Many of these would be assigned to MKULTRA mind-control projects, where they continued the research they had been doing in Germany.

- MKULTRA projects included special schooling/training for young children who showed special talents or aptitudes. These children were often selected from military families. The programs were started as early as 1953, but possibly earlier. These programs used hypnosis and sometimes even trauma-induced MPD to access and/or enhance a child’s hidden talents, and any sort of long-range programming that might be desired could be implanted in their subconscious so that, at the very least, they would always choose certain behavior patterns over others under given situations. These programmed behavior patterns could be set up to be triggered by specific situational events.

- In support of the above, CIA Director Richard Helms stated in a memo to the Warren Commission in 1964: “Cybernetics [or computer theory] can be used in the moulding of a child's character, the inculcation of knowledge and techniques, the amassing of experience, the establishment of social behaviour patterns all functions which can be summarised as control of the growth processes of the individual.” The wording of this memo suggests that this had already been successfully achieved, and that children were the primary targets of these experiments.

- In August 1964, while Admiral George Stephen Morrison was commanding the US fleet in the Gulf of Tonkin as part of a false flag operation that would escalate into the Vietnam War, his son Jim Morrison was attending UCLA. He had arrived in Los Angeles only eight months earlier. At this point, Jim showed no noticeable aptitude for music, and was more interested in film. However, in June of 1965 he formed his band, the Doors, and within a few years he became one of the biggest rock icons in history and had a huge influence on youth culture for years after. His style of music often had a hypnotic quality to it, and the verses to many songs reflected deep mystical experiences – something that Jim seemed to be continually fascinated with. There was also a strong sense of rebellion and escapism present in many other songs. He also sang about death. Prior to even forming a band, Jim had already compiled enough lyrics – in the form of poetry – to fill several record albums.

- Around 1965, San Francisco became a mecca for young people from across the country who suddenly felt the calling to travel there, converging at Haight-Ashbury. They continued to make it their destination for several years, flooding the city. A number of those who arrived early on and became central figures in the music scene were from military families and often grew up on military bases. These included Frank Zappa (and his wife Gail Sloatman); John Phillips (and his wife Susie Adams); David Crosby; Stephen Stills; Jimi Hendrix (and his manager, Michael Jeffrey, a British intel agent); Joni Mitchell; Gram Parsons; Gerry Beckley, Dan Peek, and Dewey Bunnell from the band America; Joan Baez; Jackson Browne; and, of course, Jim Morrison.

- Frank Zappa, whose father was a chemical warfare specialist who raised his son on military bases, and Frank’s wife Gail Sloatman, who came from a long line of career Naval officers and whose father worked on classified nuclear weapons research, took up residence in a large mansion in Laurel Canyon and turned it into a hangout/crash pad for the many young people who would find their way there. Many of these people would later become icons in the music industry. How Zappa and his wife were able to afford this large property is unknown. According to McGowan, Zappa had nothing but contempt for the hippie culture that he helped to create and surrounded himself with, and was a rigidly authoritarian control-freak who supported US military actions in Southeast Asia. His manager, Herb Cohen, was a former US Marine with a shady past as an arms dealer.

- John Phillips and David Crosby, who became two of the earliest music icons to come out of Laurel Canyon during the 1960s, also had military backgrounds. Phillips was the son of a US Marine Corp Captain, and spent his youth in a series of elite military prep schools in the Washington, DC area, culminating in an appointment to the prestigious US Naval Academy at Annapolis. David Crosby’s father had been a World War II military intelligence officer, and his family tree is deeply rooted in American politics and Freemasonry. Phillips wrote the song ‘San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair)’, and was also instrumental in organizing the Monterey Pop Festival, both of which were given heavy media promotion and drew freedom-loving young people from across the country to California (the song was released on May 13, 1967). This culminated in the ‘Summer of Love’ in 1967.

- Around 1965, drugs that were once strictly limited to MKULTRA experimentation became easily available on the street in San Francisco and Los Angeles. They were being dispensed freely and in large quantities by only a few sources, including Augustus Owsley Stanley III, Timothy Leary, and Ronald Hadley Stark. The amount of hallucinogens freely handed out numbered in the tens of thousands of doses. It was discovered years later that Leary and Stark were both CIA operatives.

- A number of MKULTRA projects were being conducted in various hospitals, prisons, and military bases in Southern California throughout the 1960s. Many of these projects were interested in studying the effects of hallucinogens like LSD and psilocybin in real life situations. These studies included both witting and unwitting subjects. Many witting subjects were chosen from among the most violent prison populations and mental wards. Unwitting subjects were predominantly chosen from the civilian population.

- A number of cult groups began to emerge in California in the mid-1960s. Cults and cult dynamics had been studied extensively in various MKULTRA projects prior to this. Many of the cults were interlinked, and many of the cult leaders were since found to have had ties to the CIA. Some of these cults were involved in drug trafficking and/or murder.

- One of these cults was the Brotherhood of Eternal Love, founded by Timothy Leary at Harvard in 1963. Leary had access to large quantities of pure liquid LSD.

- The Church of Satan is another cult that was founded in San Francisco in 1966. Michael Aquino became a member in 1969, soon after he finished training in the US Army as a psychological warfare specialist. Aquino also did a tour of duty in Vietnam after his training as a psyop specialist, before returning to San Francisco.

- The Process Church of the Final Judgment, a Scientology spin-off with a satanic leaning, is another cult that set up their headquarters in Haight-Ashbury in 1967. During their early years, they had sought out ties with various counterculture icons such as Mick Jagger, Marianne Faithful, Allen Ginsberg, Timothy Leary, and Abbie Hoffman. Charles Manson, David Berkowitz, and Sirhan Sirhan all had ties to this cult.

- The Phoenix Program was initiated in Vietnam in 1967. As part of a massive psyop, US soldiers indiscriminately raped, tortured, killed, and dismembered any civilians suspected of sympathizing with the enemy. The effect of this on the soldiers carrying out or witnessing the violence was total desensitization to it, often leading to psychopathy. Most or all of these soldiers were returned to the US without receiving any treatment whatsoever.

- The first of a long line of serial killers began to emerge in California in 1968. Within a period of four years, the Zodiac killer, Charles Manson, Edmund Kemper, Stanley Baker, Herbert Mullin, and John Lindley Frazier were all killing people. Most of the murders were extremely gruesome, and many bore the marks of satanic ritualism.

- Throughout the 1970s, hints that a nation-wide satanic network exists and which reaches to the highest levels of power were provided by serial killers like David Berkowitz, Richard DeSalvo, Henry Lee Lucas, and Ottis Toole.

SOME NOTES ON JIM MORRISON

It shouldn’t be assumed from the above that Jim Morrison or any other musician of the time was any sort of witting agent in a CIA/military plot against the youth of America. However, it is very likely that, having grown up in military families, Jim and others like him had been volunteered by their parents for ‘aptitude enhancement’ programs or even experimentation in MKULTRA projects long before they arrived at Laurel Canyon. It is a regular practice within the military to cull subjects for certain types of research and experimentation from among their own personnel and their immediate families – particularly those living on military bases.

It is also suspected that many within the military are closet satanists or members of long-established secret societies that have their own agendas, and the sacrifice of their own children to these experiments and programs would have been a show of loyalty or patriotism. We need to consider this in respect to the fact that Jim’s father was wittingly involved in a major false flag operation that directly led to the most gruesome war in American history. We also need to recognize that Jim was far from the only music icon to emerge in the 1960s who came from a military family.

What is important here is that the close proximity of Lookout Mountain Laboratory offered a secret location where Jim and others might have been taken from time to time for ‘fine-tuning’. Even Charles Manson, who was living in Laurel Canyon and associating with many of these rising stars in the late 1960s, might also have been a visitor to Lookout Mountain Laboratory from time to time.

It should be noted that many methods of long-term mind-control rely on memory erasure/amnesiac blocks to cover up what has been done to the subject, and that these memory blocks tend to break down after a certain length of time, and when this happens, the subject is often terminated in a manner that appears to be suicide. Jim died in 1971 from an apparent drug overdose, but whether this is true or not has always remained uncertain. Jim became more and more despondent over the years, often disappearing for long periods and never revealing where he had been. His increasing alcoholism and drug use reflected a desire to bury the reality he was living in when his ever-growing success should have resulted in the opposite.

What Jim might have felt about his family (and his father in particular) is almost completely unknown. It doesn’t appear that he ever spoke about them, and made no indication during his short life that his father was such an important man in the military. It is unlikely that Jim knew that his father was deeply involved in starting the Vietnam War, and it appears that he didn’t communicate with his family at all after he arrived in Los Angeles in 1964.

According to Jim’s close friend Frank Lisciandro, after his death, Jim’s parents were never able to recognize what their son had achieved in life, and they were nothing but embarrassed of him. They refused to talk about him and wished that nothing would ever be written about him. They felt that he reflected badly on them. This is a very interesting reaction, since it’s exactly what parents who have turned their backs on their son and completely sold him out would have said. It’s also what someone who knew a deeper truth about Jim’s past would use to excuse having to discuss anything that might reveal their part in any dark secrets. So, how long ago did they turn their backs? Was it when Jim was already making music, or was it before this? And how would Jim’s father compare his embarrassment of Jim to the embarrassment Jim might have had of his father’s activities in the Gulf of Tonkin?

I should also point out here that although David McGowan claims that none of the members of The Doors had any previous musical experience, Lisciandro, who knew Jim prior to the band forming, states that Ray Manzarek (who he knew even before Jim) was already performing with a group called Rick & The Ravens, and was very talented musically.* However, he supports McGowan’s claim that Jim had no singing talent when the Doors first performed publicly, although that quickly improved.

And then there is the question of whether Jim actually died. Many believe that his death was faked in order that he could escape the demanding life of a rock star… or perhaps to escape something much worse. He supposedly died of a heroin overdose, even though he wasn’t ever known to use that drug. No proper investigation into his death was ever carried out, no autopsy was ever conducted, he had a closed-casket funeral, and according to the original story, only one person who could positively identify the body as Jim’s ever saw it, and that was his girlfriend, Pamela Courson, who died of a heroin overdose a few years later. She never gave any interviews about his death, and this has only sustained to the mystery.

The original story about Jim’s death – that he died from a heroin overdose while in the bathtub in his Paris hotel room – has been challenged by an alternative story,** which places him in a toilet stall at the Rock ‘n’ Roll Circus nightclub in Paris after having purchased heroin for his girlfriend Pamela, and when his lifeless body was found there, it was taken back to his hotel by the dealers who had sold him the heroin. This first-hand account is given by a close friend of Jim’s, Sam Bernett, who was the manager of the nightclub at the time and claims to have seen the body when it was first found. Bernett’s account seems to be the most likely, since unlike the original story, he places himself and several others at the scene, and his revelations have led French authorities to consider reopening an investigation. The main thing that raises doubts about either account is the claim that Jim was using heroin, which he supposedly never touched. There is one possibility for why Bernett would make his story up, however, and that is that he was about to release a book about Jim, and he was attempting to promote it.

Did Jim really reach ‘The End’, or did he ‘Break on Through to the Other Side’, to escape real-life demons? I’ll leave it to readers to decide for themselves.

* See ‘The Calm Calculus of Reason’, by Frank Lisciandro

** See ‘The Shocking Truth About How My Pal Jim Morrison REALLY Died’, by Sam Bernett

SOME NOTES ON FRANK & GAIL ZAPPA

I was curious about Frank Zappa and his wife Gail, because McGowan suggests that they were somehow instrumental in the events that unfolded in Laurel Canyon, providing their large mansion (known as the Log Cabin) and property as a base where many up-and-coming musicians could visit and hang out, and it acted as a sort of melting pot for the 60s scene. All of this deserves to be looked at more closely, and certain questions need to be answered.

First and foremost, when did Frank and Gail arrive in Laurel Canyon and take up residence there, and where did they get the money to rent or purchase such a large property?

According to wikipedia’s page on Frank Zappa:

Although none of the recordings from the period achieved major commercial success, Zappa earned enough money to allow him to stage a concert of his orchestral music in 1963 and to broadcast and record it.

So Frank had made some money recording in the early 60s, and reinvested it in himself, but it seems that it couldn’t have been all that profitable, since wikipedia goes on to say that he began living and working at Pal Recording Studios soon after this when his first marriage (to Kathryn J. Sherman) started falling apart. According to wikipedia, he eventually took over the studio from its owner, Paul Buff, and renamed it Studio Z, and friends started moving in with him. Could this studio be the mansion in Laurel Canyon? No, because wikipedia goes on to tell us that he couldn’t keep up with rent payments and was evicted, and the studio was torn down in 1966.

Wikipedia also states that Frank was arrested and charged with ‘conspiracy to commit pornography’ while living at Studio Z, and spent a short time in jail for it. This was around 1965. Note that this had nothing to do with children, as I think McGowan was suggesting. According to wikipedia, it was a set-up by the police, which is very believable, particularly when it’s the LAPD.

Wikipedia goes on to tell us that after being evicted from Studio Z, Frank joined a band and they took on Herb Cohen as their manager. But it wasn’t until they were discovered by record producer Tom Wilson of Verve Records (MGM) in 1966 that they cut their first album as The Mothers of Invention. And it was this album (Freak Out!) that was Zappa’s first real success in the music industry.

Wikipedia goes on to state:

During the recording of Freak Out!, Zappa moved into a house in Laurel Canyon with friend Pamela Zarubica, who appeared on the album. The house became a meeting (and living) place for many LA musicians and groupies of the time, despite Zappa's disapproval of their illicit drug use. After a short promotional tour following the release of Freak Out!, Zappa met Adelaide Gail Sloatman. He fell in love within "a couple of minutes", and she moved into the house over the summer.

There is no mention of what residence this was or who owned it or how it was paid for. So the next question is, who is Pamela Zarubica, and was it her property? I will answer this question further on, but at this point we can pinpoint the date that Frank and Gail started living together in Laurel Canyon to the summer of 1966.

However, according to wikipedia, Frank and Gail moved to New York later on in 1966, and didn’t return to Laurel Canyon until 1968. Wikipedia states:

Zappa and The Mothers of Invention returned to Los Angeles in the summer of 1968, and the Zappas moved into a house on Laurel Canyon Boulevard, only to move again to one on Woodrow Wilson Drive in the autumn. This was to be Zappa's home for the rest of his life.

Was one of these the residence known as the Log Cabin? Wikipedia doesn’t tell us, but whatever the case, it appears that Frank couldn’t have been as involved in the Laurel Canyon scene as much as McGowan makes out, since he and his wife were in England for a large part of the time in question. At best, there is only a very small window of time when Frank and Gail could have been living in the Log Cabin and playing host and hostess to the young people coming to the area during the 60s.

As for who Pamela Zarubica is, I googled the name and learned that she was known as ‘Suzy Creamcheese’. I also came up with an online version of ‘Zappa’ by Barry Miles. This book offered some more relevant details. On page 118 it tells us:

This was the period Zappa was most closely involved with a community, largely through living with Pamela Zarubica. Rather than share with Vestine now that he had left the Mothers, Zappa preferred to sleep on Pamela's couch. In mid-May 1966, on completion of the 'Freak Out!' recording sessions, using some of his share of the advance money from MGM, Frank finally moved in with her. Pamela Zarubica's cottage at 8404 Kirkwood Drive, near the corner of Yukka, was a long narrow single-story white wood and glass structure squeezed into a tiny lot, hard up against the lush vegetation on the canyon wall, which left only a narrow sidewalk between it and the road. A huge utility pole stood outside like a maypole, with dozens of cables fanning out across the street.

...

He was now at the heart of what he would dub Freak Sanctuary, the narrow lanes leading off Kirkwood Drive and Could Avenue on the west side of Laurel Canyon, which was rapidly becoming Freak Central.

This was obviously NOT the Log cabin!

Searching through the book for any mention of the Log Cabin, I found that it states that a man named Karl Franzoni lived in the Log Cabin prior to Zappa moving in, and he was already running the place as a sort of commune. Three members of Vito's (Vito Paulekas) dance troupe, named Lucy, Sandra, and another girl named Christine Frka, were living there with Karl. These girls hung out at gigs and were the first known groupies. Lucy, Sandra, and some others were bisexual and apparently liked to make out in front of the boys.

On page 165 it states:

Franzoni's commune ended in May 1968 when Frank Zappa, Gail, little Moon Unit, Cal Schenkel, engineer Dick Kunc and Frank's English secretary Pauline Butcher, packed their bags and headed for Los Angeles. Zappa had visited Karl at the log cabin on a previous trip and realized it was perfect for his needs. The estate was owned by an eccentric African-American widow who charged $700 a month. Frank went to see her and shortly afterwards Franzoni, Lucy, Sandra and the girls found themselves with nowhere to live.

...

Also living there were Pauline Butcher, road manager Dick 'Snork' Barber, Ian Underwood, 'Motorhead' Sherwood and Pamela Zarubica. The eventual roll-call was about a dozen people.

...

One day Lucy suggested to Christine, Pamela and the girls that they all drop in on Zappa at the Log Cabin. She knew Zappa from New York, though quite how well she would never tell. While they were all talking to the Zappas, Christine drifted away and began tidying up. When Moon Unit crawled over to her, Christine casually hoisted her onto her hip and carried on cleaning. Gail was so impressed she hired her on the spot as a live-in babysitter.

With Christine living at the Log Cabin, it quickly became the central hangout for the other girls and, away from Vito, they began to evolve their own dance routines.

The book also states that Frank had suggested the girls call themselves 'Girls Together Only' or the GTOs. Pamela was one of them.

It goes on to say:

The Log Cabin became a home from home for the GTOs and soon they were all living more or less permanently in the artificial fairy grotto on the adjacent hillside. It was perfect, because rather than having to go in search of rock stars, they would come to the house; the downside was Frank's attitude to drugs.

...

The Log Cabin became an essential stop-off point for all visiting British rock musicians.

So it appears that Frank Zappa wasn’t really as instrumental a character in the early Laurel Canyon scene that McGowan makes him out to be, although he did provide a location in the later years for much of the activity that went on. Frank and Gail were absent from the scene for at least 18 months between 1966 and 1968. It was only after they returned in the summer of 1968 that they took up residence in the Log Cabin. The place was a commune long before he took up residence there, and this commune had been started by one Kark Franzoni, who was already letting some of Vito Paulekas’ young groupies live there. And these young girls were already interested in hanging out at gigs and offering themselves to the musicians.

How many groupies who found their way into the dressing rooms and bedrooms of rising rock stars might have actually been planted there to keep tabs on their idols while servicing them sexually? And how many were called on to help in the ‘suicidal’ demise of their idols when directed to? These young girls – many still underage – were often described as runaways, and yet nobody ever seemed at all curious about where their families were or whether they might be worried about them. It begs the question: How many of them might have also come from military families?

After all, these girls sound more like they were the product of a certain MKULTRA program that specializes in creating sexually promiscuous females for espionage and blackmail, than they do mere runaways with little worldly experience. Now, if it can only be shown that they all had butterfly tattoos, it would almost clinch it.

We’ve discovered from the above that it was someone other than Frank Zappa who was actually instrumental in establishing the hippie scene in Laurel Canyon: a man named Karl Franzoni. It appears that if there was some sort of government conspiracy going on behind the scenes to draw all these up-and-coming music icons to Laurel Canyon, it was (at least partly) due to the lure of the very sexually active young groupies known collectively as the GTOs. Frank Zappa just let them continue to use the Log Cabin once he took it over.

It seems to me that if there was a conspiracy behind the music scene that developed in Laurel Canyon during the 60s, and if this conspiracy involved some of the finished products of MKULTRA, then it would more likely be whoever was handling these girls who were responsible for creating the early scene that got it all started, and people like Jim Morrison and Frank Zappa were unwittingly used in a different capacity, whether or not they ever received any ‘aptitude enhancement’ when they were younger. The girls would have been no more aware of what they were really doing, only following what they thought were their own free-will choices and actions. They would have been a very strong enticement for all those young males who were arriving on the scene. How much more enticement would a guy like Jim Morrison need to decide to become a rock musician at that point? A little hypnotic programming earlier on to plant the idea and bring it to mind at the right time is all…

Wikipedia tells us one more interesting thing about Frank that shouldn’t go without comment:

Zappa was often sick as a child, suffering from asthma, earaches and sinus problems. A doctor treated his sinusitis by inserting a pellet of radium into each of Zappa's nostrils; little was known about the potential dangers of even small amounts of therapeutic radiation.

So Frank appears to have been used in an experimental capacity as a child, and although it doesn’t state it as such, it can be assumed by the unorthodox nature of the ‘treatment’ using a highly radioactive substance that it was conducted by a military doctor, and probably for reasons other than to try to cure his problem. I mean, who would ever attempt to use a radioactive substance to cure a sinus problem, outside of the lunatics working for MKULTRA? We might also wonder about the cause of his nose and ear problems, since these were both favored insertion points for electronic implants in the early days of MKULTRA, and they could cause continual medical problems for the recipients.

Before I end this section, I want to clarify one last time that it’s very unlikely that any of the rock icons that came out of the 60s and 70s were witting agents of the government, bent on destroying the hopes and dreams that young people held at that time. However, I find it very likely that at least a few of them – including Jim Morrison and Frank Zappa – were unwittingly involved in secret government programs that led them into the lifestyles that they took up, and were even given special favor by key people working behind the scenes, in order to establish them as the figureheads of a movement that was purposely intended to subvert opposition to the government, both then and in the years ahead.

THE CHILDHOOD PROGRAMMING OF JACK SARFATTI

MKULTRA was involved in putting children through special ‘aptitude enhancement’ programs as early as 1953 and molding them for later use as adults. This is written about in Jack Sarfatti’s ‘Destiny Matrix 2012’ (freely available online). Sarfatti, in case you’ve never heard the name before, is a theoretical physicist and mathematician who was involved in consciousness exploration projects going on at Esalen in California during the 70s (working directly with some of the biggest names in the field). He also assisted in psychic experiments involving Uri Geller that led to the top-secret remote-viewing programs at SRI. He now does contract work for the Department of Defense.

From his book:

One of approximately 400 pre-adolescent "whiz kids" selected nationally to participate in a classified U.S. government program during the late 1940's and early 1950's - a Cold War effort to cultivate "best and the brightest" American youth to serve the nation in a variety of scientific and economic areas geared towards national defense, Sarfatti recalls that former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan was definitely and he surmised that physicist and paranormal researcher Harold Puthoff was probably among the government's fellow recruits.

…

Recruiting young geniuses, educating them in the areas where they are most gifted, and calling on them in the future to lend their skills to various government efforts was a logical extension of early Cold War thinking. Compared to a plethora of darker, sinister and now infamous "black" projects conducted by the CIA and Defense Department from the McCarthy Era forward, it is also reasonable and healthy.

…

Sarfatti may have come to the attention of government canvassers because of his uncle Arthur Jacobson, who developed a singular reputation during his WWII combat infantry services in the Pacific Theatre. Arthur showed a consistent intuitive ability to sense the locations of enemy snipers and emplacements, and apparently came to the attention of Army brass, who used him as human counter-sniper detecting GPS and a jungle warfare instructor.

On the other hand, selecting Sarfatti may have had less to do with his uncle's extra-sensory predisposition than the precocious eight and nine years old Sarfatti keeping constant company with his grandfather, who frequently associated with Army psychiatrists and officers of significant scientific backgrounds in late 1940's New York City. Sarfatti remembered, "As my grandfather drove, I would sit in the back seat, with these colonels...I mean they were always analyzing. I was actually in the company of these Army officers a lot. That's when I think I met this fun colonel named Phil Corso who later wrote, The Day After Roswell."

…

At about the same time, a lengthy experience with paranormal overtones invaded Sarfatti's early adolescence. He began receiving a series of anonymous telephone calls that chroniclers of his life label the "God-phone.

…

The voice sought to speak only with Sarfatti, never anyone else. While Sarfatti only recalls the first call clearly, and has vague recollections that there may have been subsequent calls, his mother recounted that the calls persisted for "three weeks," and only stopped when she finally grabbed the phone out of exasperation over perceptible changes in Jack's personality and told the "caller" never to call again.

In Sarfatti’s own words:

When I was thirteen or maybe twelve, I got a very strange set of phone calls in which there was a mechanical voice, and it could have been simulated, but the story is of this mechanical voice that it was a computer onboard a spacecraft in the future!

…

[I]t wanted to teach me things, and I was supposed to meet these "others" in 20 years. This was 1953 and twenty years would be 1973. So this kind of whole weird thing happened. And the odd thing about it was that I only remember one of the phone calls. But my mother, I only found this out later, my mother remembers weeks of them and hours at a time, which I have no memory of whatsoever. I was walking around glassy-eyed. And finally she got worried...finally she grabbed the phone from me and says "who's this?" and heard this metallic sounding voice. And it said "this is a computer aboard a spacecraft and it wanted to speak to me." She got angry and said "Don't ever call here again," and slammed the phone down. That was her memory of it that she told me about later.

…

Either it was what it says it was, or a government program, take your choice. I mean, given everything else, it sounds like it's a government project. They're still playing psychological games on these kids, quite possibly.

…

And whatever was on the other end of that the telephone said I would begin to link up with the others, part of the group, in twenty years. Twenty years would be around 1973.

…

[F]rom the mid 60s until 1971- 72, I was pretty straight and narrow in terms of mainstream science. I was not thinking very much about the fringe stuff at all. Then in 1973, 20 years after the phone calls, a whole bunch of weird things started happening. It's too complicated to go into, but it's in my book "Destiny Matrix". I wound up at this SRI thing with Geller, and there's all kinds of weird things happening, so from 73 ...I ran into all these weird people...witches and warlocks in London, - just a whole bunch of crazy stuff happening.

So we see here that the government was certainly running secret ‘aptitude enhancement’ programs involving children who were selected from military families that go back as far as the 1950s, and that those who were involved had little recall of their experiences in the program, but who found themselves propelled into careers that were meant to be part of a larger plan.

Sarfatti provides a few more details:

I was part of a group of super kids, these genius kids that were being studied at the Columbia University Laboratory of William Sheldon, and one of his assistants, a Walter Breen, (we're talking like 1953). One member of the group was a guy named Johnny Glogower. He was a year younger than me. He was a Westinghouse Science finalist. He was a Quiz Kid on the radio show "Quiz Kids". There was a bunch of them, a guy named Robert Solovay, who became a famous mathematician at Berkeley. And even Alan Greenspan [was there].

…

Greenspan is older than I am, but Greenspan became part of this group. It was all also connected somehow with Ayn Rand. Somehow Ayn Rand had something to do with it. It was also connected to the government. It had something to do with what later became Sandia Labs in New Mexico. In fact we used to have these guys come up (they looked like FBI guys), and this was the McCarthy era, to get pep talks about being patriotic and anti-communist and all that kind of stuff.

…

[T]here's a friend of mine named Hank Harrison who was a part of it, who's the father of Courtney Love, actually Courtney Love's dad.

…

He apparently was in a similar program in Berkeley around this same time, this is like, the early Fifties, and it was tied up with the intelligence community, definitely with the government. It was kind of like the X-Men. I mean what they were trying to do...what they were trying to see. First of all, they were trying to promote an interest in Science.

This last bit is interesting, because most readers will remember that Kurt Cobain followed the same tragic road as Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, etc. that ended in their ‘suicide’. And most of us have heard the rumors that Courtney Love had much to do with Kurt Cobain’s untimely death. I’ll have to research Hank Harrison further, but for now, let’s get back to Sarfatti’s description of the program he was involved in as a child:

There were experiments, and they would just sit with the kids, you know, trying to get them to move objects. We never moved anything, but there was a whole program going on about this. Also, they talked about aliens and flying saucers, trying to figure out how they fly, and all that kind of stuff, it was a lot of science fiction. Oh, and I met Isaac Asimov at that time.

…

Walter [Breen] was very much part of the sci-fi scene then, and also he's one of the founders of MENSA. This is in New York in the Fifties. Walter wanted me to go to the University of Chicago for some reason. And when I graduated from high school in 1956, the people in this program wrote the recommendations for me for the schools I applied to. So I applied to MIT, Cornell, and the University of Chicago.

…

I went to Cornell, and I remember Breen wrote the recommendation that got me into Cornell. Apparently it was like a ten page recommendation.

…

My mother didn't have any money, and my parents were divorced, so I got a full scholarship to Cornell. My professors were the guys who built the atomic bomb in Los Alamos.

It’s amazing for a kid from a relatively poor family to have all the doors opened for them so that they receive the best education possible… unless of course they’re already sold into the ‘program’ early on, huh?

He goes on to describe what he remembers of his experiences as a child that may have led to him being selected for the secret program:

[I]t turns out my grandfather, even before this Columbia Project, which was definitely some kind of intelligence thing...before that my grandfather worked for the US Army. He was a veteran, and this is when I was 8 or 9 years old. I was actually living with the grandparents. And after school, I would go to meet my grandfather, who was at the Army Quartermaster Corps, in the Garment District of New York. And that was a very strange situation, maybe I was 10 or 11 years old...but I would hang out there and play. And they had a laboratory there.

…

My grandfather drove around with these Army officers - my grandfather was driving the car, and I would sit in the back seat, with these colonels...they must have been psychiatrists. I mean they were always analyzing. And it's all kind of consistent. (because) at time I was, going to build rockets, go to the moon, or all this kind of stuff. But all of this was encouraging me, I was actually in the company of these Army officers alot. That's when I saw this fun colonel named Phil Corso who wrote a book, "The Day After Roswell", many years later. I'm pretty sure Col. Corso's one of those guys, really...though I can't prove it. This would've been around 1950.

…

Then there were other scientists. A guy named Hal Puthoff, who's right now in Texas, about my age, also had similar experiences, and has been involved, I mean he actually was a Naval officer. He worked for the National Security Agency, and is now one of the active researchers in UFO's and the paranormal. In fact it was Hal Puthoff who was involved in a CIA project at Stanford Research Institute back in the 70's.

…

That's where I first met him. So this has all been kind of a consistent picture of what looks like a very long term intelligence effort, definitely involving the British, definitely involving the Americans and probably other agencies as well[.]

So we have here someone of relative significance describing their first-hand childhood experience in a top-secret government ‘aptitude enhancement’ program, and naming other significant people who were also there alongside him.

These ‘aptitude enhancement’ programs for gifted children were being run as far back as 1953, and they were primarily selecting their subjects from among the children of military personnel. Also, they apparently used memory blocks to hide some of the things that went on in these programs, so that Sarfatti was only ever able to recall very little about it. Whatever the case, as Sarfatti grew up, he had all the right doors opened for him so that he could get the education he would need to arrive at the place in life that had been set out for him. Essentially, although he was influenced early on to pursue science, he was also influenced to take a deep interest in UFOs and more fantastical things of that nature.

Could Jim Morrison, Frank Zappa, David Crosby, John Phillips, or anyone else from the Laurel Canyon scene have been involved in a similar program that was focused on enhancing their musical aptitudes, and were they later propelled, perhaps by hypnotically planted subconscious suggestions, to get involved in the music scene that was developing in Los Angeles in the 60s? And were they perhaps unknowingly taken to Lookout Mountain Laboratory from time to time for ‘tune ups’, or otherwise monitored from there?

The more you understand what MKULTRA was involved in within all of its various projects over the years, and the more you understand the methods they used to identify good experimental subjects for these projects, and the more you understand the various methods they used to manipulate and control the behaviors of these subjects without them ever suspecting it, the easier it will be for you to understand how possible it is that the scene that developed in Laurel Canyon (and elsewhere) was largely orchestrated by government agents using unwitting military brats as Pied Pipers to purposely lead American youth down a dead-end road.

To Be Continued…

Note 1: Since I wrote the first part of this series, I’ve learned that both Carly Simon and Doors band member Robbie Krieger were also from ‘connected’ families. Carly Simon comes from the Simon’s of the Simon & Schuster book publishing dynasty, and Robbie Krieger’s father was head of the Rand Corporation.

Note 2: I’ve also come across a published letter from Jim Morrison’s father to his deceased son, in which the man expresses incredible pomposity and self-glorification while demeaning Jim in every possible way. It reveals a lot about the strained relationship between these two, and I warn those who respect Jim and his work that they will probably be angered by his father’s utter ignorance and disrespect of Jim and his accomplishments. It’s a slap in the face to all of Jim’s fans. For some of you, like me, it will sound very familiar to how your own parents and family have treated or spoken about you for making your own choices in life. For those interested, you can read it at this link:

http://www.georgethomasclark.com/?p=1119

 

More on the Bombing Scene (Site#2) - Part 2

This is a continuation of my analysis of the above photo. In my last post I established that this photo was taken just after bomb #1 went of and seconds before bomb #2 went off, and the location that it was taken was one short block west of site #2. Now, I want to follow this up and concentrate on the people we see in the foreground.

Starting at the far left, in front of suspect #2, we have MIT man (1) and the woman in black beside him (2). At center, we have the man in the toque with his back to the camera (3), and to his immediate right the older man facing to the left (4). On the far right, we have the running woman (5), who has been identified in post #1786 as Collier Clegg, and who claims to be a university student that just happened to get caught in the melee.

Some preliminary observations:

- MIT man’s right foot is flat on the ground, indicating that he’s walking.

- 2’s feet appear to be off the ground, indicating that she’s running. She may be with the girl next to her, and uninvolved.

- 3 is standing or moving about slowly.

- 4 is standing casually. He appears to be with 3.

- The cameraman and another person in a beige cap (lower left corner) appear to be with 3 and 4 as well.

- 1 appears to be looking either at 3 and 4, or at 5.

- 2 appears to be looking at 3 and 4.

- 3 appears to be looking back at either the first blast, or the suspects.

- 4 appears to be looking at 1 and 2.

- 5 appears to be looking at either 1 and 2, or at suspect #2.

- 1 appears to be in a serious mood.

- 2 appears to be grinning.

- 4 is definitely smiling and appears very calm.

- 5 appears to be smiling.

Just to note, I also notice that the girl running beside 2 has tears in her jeans. She may be with 2, and/or may be intending to play a victim at site #2.

What gets my attention more than anything else in this photo is 4, who is smiling away right after the first blast, and looking quite calm in spite of the panic in the background. He also has that ‘seasoned cop’ look about him.

In fact, all five have that ‘undercover cop’ look about them, IMO. Cops always dress a certain way (usually plain clothing), groom themselves a certain way, and act a certain way. They have very little imagination or style that reflects any sense of individuality when they’re on the job. They’ll usually be distinguishable by their coordinated clothing style and colors when working as part of a team – particularly where members may not know each other personally. They also have a habit of hanging tightly onto anything heavy they’re carrying when they run, as we see both 2 and 5 doing with one hand in their pockets. I suspect these are their radios.

Getting back to my preliminary observations, we can assume that 1 and 2 are not together. 1 has been walking along Boylesron just ahead of the suspects, while 2 and 5 have been running in parallel, moving in the same direction as the suspects. 2 and 5 have therefore come up from behind the suspects, and are now passing by 1, 3, and 4. 3 and 4 have been hanging around that spot, along with the cameraman.

Now, considering the likelihood that the cameraman was with 3 and 4, and that the appearance of 4 is as it is, I wonder about the reason why this photograph was taken. I suspect that it was intentionally taken to capture an image of the suspects near site #2 after the first blast, as part of their setup as the patsies.

I proposed in a previous post that there would have been two teams directing this operation, one at each bomb site. Just like we saw the mercenaries at site #1 both before and just after the blast, the team at site #2 would be located somewhere near that site but out of range of the blast, as we see with 3 and 4.

I also proposed earlier that the suspects were directed to walk the route they did, and I now propose that MIT man is their FBI handler, who may have been leading them on their route that day, or was otherwise stationed along the route to watch for them and make sure they did as instructed. To support the suggestion that MIT man is their handler, I offer the following images of what appears to be the same man during the manhunt:

 

 

Apart from the similarity in the hairstyle and facial structure, the most telling thing here are the shoes:

Note the color, the low-cut tops, the flat toes, the laces, and the shape of the sole – particularly the heal area.

I think we might have the same man being detained during the manhunt as we have in this photo of the street during the bombings. I want to discuss this further later on, but for now I want to stick to analyzing the scene in the first photo above.

We know that, for whatever reason, the suspects were chosen to be the unwitting patsies in this operation. They had a history of some kind with the FBI, and it’s possible that they had been recruited (or at least thought they had), with the intent to use them in whatever way they might be useful.

If this is anywhere near accurate, then an agent would have been assigned to act as their handler, being the only one in the agency that they would normally ever come be contact with.

I can only assume that the suspects were invited to tag along on this operation in order to “get their feet wet”. They would have been told to just follow instructions and not ask any questions. They may not even know their handler’s real identity. I’m sure that they were deeply involved with the FBI at the point of the bombings, and had probably been used to try to infiltrate Middle-Eastern or Russian terrorist cells. But they just didn’t have what it takes, and the FBI recognized this and decided to dispose of them. Thus the reason for using them as patsies in the bombings.

So I propose that MIT man is the suspect’s handler. He probably didn’t know at the time of the bombings that he’s helping to set up his protégés. He probably didn’t know that he’s involved in a criminal act at the time that the photo was taken. Like his two protégés, he’s expected to just take orders and carry them out. The same goes for 2 and 5, and possibly even 3 and 4. Only 1 really needs to know who the suspects are, but if 2 and 5 are involved as I describe here, then they would also know, but none of them would know that the suspects were being set up.

So let’s consider what might be going on in the first photo.

Just prior to the blasts, the suspects/patsies are instructed by their FBI handler (MIT man) to walk separately and follow him away from the marathon and head west. As they do, the bombs are set off, so that we see them here at Boyleston and Fairfield following MIT man just after passing site #2 and just before the second bomb goes off. MIT man has just made eye contact with his supervisor (4), who has been waiting for him to come along. This is a signal to proceed with the main plan.

The suspects have also been tailed by 2 and 5, who are now moving past them as they reach this point, while 1 is now signaling to 3 and 4 that the suspects have arrived. 3 and 4 have been stationed at that corner, waiting for 1 to come along and give the signal. The cameraman snaps a picture at the signal. He doesn’t know who the suspects are either. He’s just there to be the anonymous source for this incriminating photo of the suspects passing site #2 just before the second blast. 4 is supervising this part of the operation, being in charge of site/bomb #2. 3 is the man who actually triggers the detonation once 4 gives him the go ahead. Since 3 would have to know about the bomb if he’s the one who triggers it, his face may have been purposely hidden in the photo. 4, although he also knows about the bomb, is an experienced agent who poses little threat to later exposure, so he’s not quite as concerned about his face being seen in the shot.

Some clarifying points:

- 1, 2, and 5 know who the suspects are.

- 3 and possibly 4 don’t know who the suspects are.

- the cameraman doesn’t know who the suspects are.

This compartmentalization assures that the facts about the case can’t be easily put together so that no one is in a position to expose the larger operation.

I’ll stop here for now. In this post, I’ve made a number of observations that suggest that the people described in the photo are tied to the bombings. I might be right, or I might be wrong. Either way, there had to be something like what I’ve described going on to make sure that setting up the patsies was guaranteed, and this particular photo was crucial to that. If the suspects had decided to turn off Boyleston at Exeter (between #1 and #2) then the official story would be weakened. If anyone had taken a picture with them in it at some other location during this crucial time period, then the official story would have been weakened even further. I feel very strongly that this photo was taken by the feds themselves, and released to the public to convince them of the official story.

Anthony Forwood

More on the Boston Bombing Scene - Bomb Site #2

I’ve been studying the above photo, and there are a number of things I want to comment on. If any of this has been covered elsewhere, I apologize.

First, I wanted to determine where it was taken in relation to the two bomb sites in order to determine the direction that the suspects were walking, so I used the street sign as a guide and located Boyleston and Fairfield on a map. Here it is with the suspect’s location marked in yellow:

Next, I wanted to determine more precisely where in the photo the second bomb site was. To do this, I dug up the best shots I could find of bomb #2 going off, in order to locate any landmarks that I could coordinate with the first photo. Here’s the best two photos I have of the initial blast at site #2:

You can see in these two images that site #2 was just this side of the white building, which can be seen in the background of first photo as well. If you zoom in on that photo, you can see an American flag sticking out almost horizontally from this white building (see below). Looking at the first of the above two photos of blast #2, you can just make out the flagpole on the white building just behind the plume of smoke and fire. This gives a more exact idea of where site #2 is in the first photo.

 

The above image is a close-up of the area where site #2 is in the first photo. It’s pretty clear from this that bomb #2 hadn’t yet exploded when the photo was taken. The bomb is located on the curb just this side of the crosswalk (lower right corner).

Here’s another close-up with the approximate location of the bomb marked off with crosshairs:

We can see that a lot of people are on the sidewalk running away from the first bomb that has just gone off further down, and they’re passing directly through site #2 just as it’s about to go off, with the bomb on one side of them and the buildings on the other. There’s no one on the street anywhere near where the bomb should be. Take another look at the two photos of the explosion, and note that the flame extends out across the sidewalk where they are running.

We can see in the last image above that there seems to be something on the street at about the spot where bomb #2 is, but it’s unclear what. Here’s a view of the same area during the second blast, but from the opposite side:

 

Now we can see some things that weren’t clear in the previous images. The first thing to note is the ‘something’ on the street, and what appears to be debris from the bomb that extends in a narrow line out onto the street. This debris is in line with the mailbox and streetlight, but the smoke seems to be coming from somewhere a little further back and closer to the buildings. Also note that nobody is affected by any percussion from the blast, there are no smoke trails from jettisoned projectiles, and there is no disturbance of that ‘something’ on the street. The second blast appears to have been a carefully controlled one, just like the first.

This doesn’t mean that nobody was hurt. It just provides more evidence that #2 was a controlled explosion like #1. But considering the size of the initial flames, and the fact that people were running directly into them, I would assume that at least a few actually got hit by the flames and lost a few eyebrows.

Here’s a close-up of the crowded sidewalk at site #2 during the explosion. I’ve adjusted the image settings slightly to bring out the features as best as I can:

We can see that the sidewalk is quite congested, but nobody is taking to the open street, so there has to be a reason. If bomb #2 and resulting injuries were completely staged, then it would have been necessary to deal with the crowd running from bomb #1 so that they didn’t screw things up or see what they shouldn’t, so they were either stopped just before they reached site #2, or it was somehow triggered when there was a break in the crowd. The latter would be too chancy, so that leaves us with the only option that some people ran right through the explosion and suffered possible injuries from the initial flames. But that’s all, IMO.

I’ll continue with further analysis of the first photo in a later post, and focus on some other interesting details.

 

Anthony Forwood

Stage Hands and Actors at the Boston Bombing - The Brown-Shirted Girl

by Anthony Forwood

This is at the first bomb site, immediately after the blast. The brown-shirted girl is standing against the picket fencing, just observing everyone. The red circle shows what appears to be a camera or something that looks similar.

In this next image we see her taking or passing something to or from another person in the crowd.

here, we can see that this woman has something bulging in the front pocket of her pullover. She also appears to be signalling someone with her left hand. So is the black woman on the ground, covering 'Jeff Bauman'.

Here she is just hanging around at the scene. Why is she there? Is this normal for police to allow someone to just walk around a crime scene like this?

Here's another shot of her on the crime scene.

Here's another shot of her on the crime scene from a different angle. She appears to be either taking a picture or making a cell call.

Here she is apparently leaving the scene.

This collection of images is just one small peek into the many strange people and activities that earmark this event as a staged hoax. Please take the time to investigate the evidence that is coming out (thanks to independent researchers) that is exposing this for what it really is. Do not blow it off as a conspiracy theory without looking. The mainstream media cannot be trusted any more. Neither can your police and government.

To Those Who Doubt the Boston Bombing was a Hoax

by Anthony Forwood

Nothing that the corrupt actions your government engages in is meant to be simple to perceive, when they are intent on deceiving you. Even a little complexity puts most people off from looking very far or thinking too deeply…

Let me try to help you doubters understand how this hoax was pulled off. I suggest that those who doubt it was a hoax pay attention here and not be so simplistic in your thinking, and take the time while you read this to closely analyze the many available photos that reveal the clues … What I say here in this post is mostly regarding ‘Jeff Bauman’ and how the other crisis actors, police, doctors, etc., were kept out of the loop as to what was really going on. There is still much more evidence I could present to show that at least the first bomb was a staged hoax using the second (real?) bomb as a cover, but I want to try to keep this as short as possible. I will be more than happy to answer any questions that arise, since I’m sure that this one post won’t be able to cover every point to completely satisfy every doubter out there.

The first thing to note – and this is key – is that prior to the explosions, there were various announcements being made, including one by the Boston Globe that was posted on Twitter, stating that there would be a ‘controlled explosion’ in the area as part of a bomb drill. The Twitter announcement came just minutes before the explosions. Strangely, the authorities later denied that these announcements were ever made, although the Twitter announcement was captured by a user and posted online as proof of the fact that they were indeed made. Many witnesses at the marathon also heard the announcements being made over the loudspeakers and have attested to the fact.

 

How is this significant? The reason for the announcements was a preemptive measure, in case this psyop failed and the first bomb blast was discovered to be a staged event. Once the psyop was seen to have been successful (the crisis actors weren’t discovered by onlookers to be merely acting and using props), the authorities denied the earlier announcements. Both bombs would now be included as part of a terrorist plot.

Now, this ties directly into how this could be a hoax with so many people involved. Consider the fact that the people at ground zero of the first bomb site (the one at the finish line) were all knowingly part of this bomb drill, including police, medics, and the crisis actors playing the part of injured victims and witnesses. So there is no reason for any of these people to be ‘in’ on any conspiracy and cover-up. They were simply playing out a drill. For the most part, they had no idea at all that they were taking part in a hoax.

If you do a little online research (google ‘crisis actors’), you’ll discover that many of the different government agencies conduct practice exercises of emergency situations that are designed to be as realistic as possible. These exercises use crisis actors who specialize in playing injured victims. They also involve members of various coordinated agencies (FEMA, FBI, BATF, HUD, DEA, etc.), as well as medics, doctors, reporters, police, etc. They even hire extras to act as witnesses. All of these people are given their parts and are expected to act just as they would in a real situation. Therefore, they will even go so far as to have reporters interview the witnesses, rescue workers, doctors, etc. These people all know that it is a staged practice drill, but they must be as professional and realistic as possible, because this exercise is a test of their skills and abilities in a real situation.

But one very important thing about these exercises, in order for them to be as realistic as possible, and therefore provide the best test of the skills of those involved, is to not tell them anything more than that there will be an exercise drill. They will not be told that it will be a bomb situation. They will not be told exactly when or where it will occur, or how it will play out. The only people involved who will know these things are the crisis actors playing the injured victims, for obvious reasons.

Now, consider the fact that there was another explosion a few blocks away only seconds after the first one. What would all those involved in the bomb drill think later on when they heard the news on TV, other than that a real bombing occurred while they were doing their drill? They would believe that any reports of real injuries would have been from that second bomb. And perhaps there were some real injuries in that second blast, I don’t know. The point is, a second explosion at another nearby location would confuse matters enough that the authorities (with assistance from their media puppets) could get away with the staged bombing with all the faked injuries, which would have exceptional emotional appeal to present as a terrorist attack. You will notice that an attempt to try to find out who was hurt at which bomb site and how badly is almost impossible, since the media is purposely being very vague about this. Were ANY people seriously hurt by the second bomb? Was it just a percussion bomb? There are no photos available of that site, AFAIK.

Also, it needs to be realized that ANYONE might be used to play the interviewed doctors and surgeons who purportedly operated on the injured. Who would be able to say that what they claimed was true or not? Who could say that they were real doctors or just actors as well? Who could say that the interviews were real or part of a staged exercise? These are important questions to ask yourself if you are stuck on the idea that this couldn’t have been staged due to all the people involved. In reality, only a very few key players will be in on the big picture, while everybody else is dealt with on a need-to-know basis, and information about what is really taking place remains highly compartmentalized and tightly controlled at all times. Further to this, since this would be considered a secret operation, all involved parties who would be in on any critical and damaging information would have had to have signed a non-disclosure agreement or taken a secrecy oath, in order to guarantee they didn’t speak out or say the wrong things. This is a routine procedure these days, so it wouldn’t be all that unusual to be bound by a secrecy oath.

You also need to realize how hard it actually is to go public about something. The mainstream media is completely controlled and will not report what they are told not to report. If someone instead goes online to report knowledge of an inside job, they can be easily weeded out and incapacitated by blocking their abilities to reach a wide audience, so that although they might still be able to talk, only a few might ever hear them.

So, keeping a lid on what really took place and presenting the staged event as real was not such a problem, although anyone who doesn’t understand how the authorities use compartmentalization and secrecy oaths to secure delicate information would tend to think that people would talk. Added to that is the fact that the second explosion helped to confuse the situation, particularly for those involved in the practice drill who knew that the first explosion was staged.

Further to all this (and I really implore readers to look closely at the available photo evidence for themselves), if you closely analyze the photo images of the first bomb site immediately after the explosion, you can see that things just aren’t right. As soon as the smoke clears (which you can actually watch clearing in some of the photos, proving that these photos were taken immediately after the blast), you can see ‘Jeff Bauman’ on the ground with his ‘leg’ sticking up in the air. You can also see that there is absolutely no blood anywhere on his ‘leg’, on him, on anyone else, or anywhere around him. You can go through the images in sequence, half-second by half-second, for the first eight or so seconds after the explosion, and watch how two accomplices with this ‘Jeff Bauman’ help him to get set up with his prop ‘leg’, and only in the last few images do you finally see a small amount of (fake) blood as it’s apparently being spread around by one of the accomplices.

Not all images of the eight second period are provided here, but you can clearly see 'Jeff Bauman' with his two accomplices on the ground to the left side of the following photos.

The problem with this ‘Jeff Bauman’ losing both his legs and severing several major arteries in the process is that there should IMMEDIATELY have been blood, tissue, and bone shards all over the place, and judging by how he has his ‘leg’ lifted up in the air, holding it over the heads of his two accomplices, they should have all been literally drenched in blood. But THEY HAVE NO BLOOD ON THEM OR AROUND THEM!

In studying the photo evidence further, you can see that one of his accomplices, a black woman in a red jacket who was quite alive, conscious, and by all appearances unhurt immediately after the explosion, is later seen laying on a gurney and by all appearances playing dead with her eyes wide open and staring blankly. And there is a clue in this particular photo to indicate that this was indeed a staged event – a cardboard sign on the ground near the gurney says: “FIREHOUSE SUBS WELL DONE!”

 

So, although there might have actually been people who were injured or even killed, they would have had to be at the second bomb site. The photo evidence of the first bomb site shows no evidence of serious injuries, except for ‘Jeff Bauman’ and his ‘suddenly dead’ female accomplice.

The photo evidence shows that at least three people at the first bomb site were acting, although everyone there were certainly crisis actors, and this particular bomb can be seen to be nothing more than a harmless smoke bomb, perhaps with a few simultaneous directed explosions to add some damage to the surrounding fixtures. Carefully study the photos from immediately after the blast and you will fail to find much evidence at all that reflects a real tragedy just occurred at this site. No blood, scratches, scrapes, cuts, bruises, burns, etc., on ANY of the people at ground zero of explosion #1.

There is one particularly revealing photograph available online that shows ‘Jeff Bauman’ laying on his side at the bomb site after the blast, with his ‘leg’ quite visible with its shaft sticking out quite noticeably, and you can see that NONE of the rescue workers are paying him ANY attention, even though they are all around him dealing with the other far less ‘injured’ people. In fact, directly behind him you can see no less than four people leaning over his male accomplice. Why is that? Would you ignore the worst casualties and instead help the least injured first? This one photo says quite a lot. Also note that in this photo, the female accomplice is nowhere to be seen, although this was the location where all three of these people were laying in earlier photos. Where did she go? Why would they take her away if she was dead, while ‘Jeff Bauman’ laid there supposedly bleeding to death?

 

In another photo, you can see this male accomplice, in hoodie and sunglasses, leisurely propped up on one elbow, not appearing to be seriously hurt, and the female accomplice is also there next to him, quite alive and sitting up. But where is ‘Jeff Bauman’, who was between them? How can this female be missing from the scene in the photo of ‘Jeff Bauman’ laying on his side, and then in this photo both her and the other accomplice are laying there together and “Jeff Bauman’ is nowhere to be seen?

 

The clincher to the ‘Jeff Bauman’ lie is the ‘Jeff Bauman’ facebook page. This page shows a completely different ‘Jeff Bauman’ than the person seen in the photo images taken of the bombing aftermath. The ‘Jeff Bauman’ at the bomb site has already been identified as Lt. Nick Vogt of the US Army. Photo comparisons will reveal that they are very likely the same person. But the person on facebook who claims to be the ‘Jeff Bauman’ who lost his legs in this bombing looks nothing like either Lt. Nick Vogt or the man in the photos from the bombing. They are NOT the same person. The facebook ‘Jeff Bauman’ is an imposter collecting donations from gullible believers who would doubt that this was a staged hoax. There are a lot of simple-minded people out there who don’t have the capacity to see through anything of any complexity, who will believe whatever they’re told without any thought. I’ve heard that this facebook imposter has already received 100s of thousands of dollars in donations, so perhaps this is a new means for these government agencies to raise funds or to pay people off. Who knows?

One more thing that needs to be understood that is very important… the ‘Jeff Bauman’ from the bomb site was the person who identified the alleged perpetrators, claiming that they made eye contact just as the alleged perp placed the bomb on the ground at his feet. This means that the man acting as ‘Jeff Bauman’ in the bomb site photos would have been a key player in any psyop that was being played out. So would the two accomplices.