Monday, October 17, 2016

The Legal Fiction - How They Control Us



Throughout the ages mankind’s ingenuity has allowed one group of people to control others. The creation of the ‘legal fiction’ is a superb example – it is the very foundation of how we are controlled today and yet the knowledge of its existence eludes all but a tiny few of us.

Judges know how the ‘legal fiction’ applies to each of us, but barristers, solicitors, Magistrates and politicians mostly do not – it is a closely guarded secret. Our courts impose their will on us using the ‘legal fiction’ and it is through this imposition that governments are able to control every facet of our lives. Without the ‘legal fiction’ governments and an array of authorities have no power over us whatsoever and with this in mind it is perfectly clear that understanding the ‘legal fiction’ is a prerequisite to understanding how the world around us really works as distinct from how we think it does. Knowledge and understanding of the legal fiction is the first step on the road of freedom.

So What Is The Legal Fiction & How Does It Impact On Our Lives?

If you tried to explain the concept of the ‘legal fiction’ to the average individual in the context of how it applies to them, there is a high degree of probability that they would stare back at you as though you were quite mad... explanation rarely attracts a demand to know more, which it should, generally people find comprehension beyond their scope of understanding and they prefer therefore to dismiss it as an absurdity. The creators of the legal fiction knew this and have used our own ignorance to further their aims to control and dominate us, their ultimate weapon being ‘plausible deniability.’ But suddenly we are waking up to what is really going on and as we do the shackles of control are starting to loosen.

Imagine having a conversation in the 10th century in which you were describing a mobile telephone to an audience... they would to a man and woman think you were a complete lunatic... despite being able to explain the science behind it, and so it is with trying to explain the ‘legal fiction’ today. Fortunately, thanks to people like John Harris, Winston Shrout, Robert Arthur Menard and others, the secret of the ‘legal fiction’ also known as the ‘strawman’ has been laid bare and as a consequence those of us who are prepared to learn are now able to take advantage of this very important knowledge.

But bear in mind this... the ‘powers-that-be’ have a vested interest in us not knowing how they effect their control over us... and this translates into them being adamant that you must not know of the existence of the legal fiction, never mind understand it. So if you are thinking about writing to the government and asking them to confirm the existence of the legal fiction, may I suggest that your time would be better spent writing to the mafia and asking them to confirm in writing that they are indeed engaged in organised crime. Please let us know if you get a reply.

The legal fiction is described briefly as ‘a means by which something can be done in law, which, without the legal fiction, would not be possible.’ Look it up in a law dictionary. There are many applications of the legal fiction concept and only through study will you get to grips with the extent of its functions. It is not complicated, just confusing and understanding it requires that you resist the urge to dismiss it as a nonsense. Because we have limited understanding of the origins of the universe, that does not mean that it does not exist - and so it is with the legal fiction.

A Company Is A Legal Fiction

If we assume that your name is Roger Hayes... you could create a legal fiction called ‘ROGER HAYES LIMITED’ which you could own lock, stock and barrel. You could lend the company money and it in turn could buy and own plant, machinery and stock and build up an array of assets and wealth through trade - all of which would then belong to the company... but not you. Yes you would own the company, but the company would own the assets. If on behalf of the company you sold some stock, you would be required to put the proceeds into the company’s bank account and not your own private account. The company would be obliged to pay back the money that you lent it, but apart from that the only way that you could take any benefit from the company would be if it paid you a wage as a manager or a dividend as a shareholder and if the company went bust with net liabilities, you would not be liable for its debts.

It is easy to see then how despite you being the only owner and thus the controller of the legal fiction ‘ROGER HAYES LIMITED’ that it remains an entirely separate entity to you. You could sell the company and somebody else would then control it, despite it keeping your name. Now to deliberately confuse you... this entity was also given the generic name ’person’ and yes, it is meant to confuse you. In legalese (the language of law) the word ‘person’ means company or corporation; it does not mean man or woman. In an ordinary dictionary ‘person’ is described as an individual human being. In a law dictionary ‘human being’ is described as a monster. Do you think they were trying to bring clarity to the meaning of words or do you think they were trying to create confusion? Obviously it was the latter and it was both deliberate and calculated.

When you were born (still assuming that your name is Roger Hayes) and your parents registered your birth, the government set up a company which they called ROGER HAYES. If you look at all your official documents you will see that they are all represented with capital letters as a means of distinction. It is important to remember, that as it was the government that created this company, it is they that own and control it – despite it having your name. The deceit was in the fact that they did not tell you, nor did they want you to know, that they would use this company (person) as a tool to attach liabilities to the real you.

Thus, ROGER HAYES the company was created and existed alongside Roger Hayes the flesh and blood boy created and named by your parents. But in the absence of the knowledge of the existence of the former everybody was led to believe that everything applied to the latter – as devious a plan surely as selling land on the sun to the unsuspecting.

When officialdom then asks the question ‘Are you Roger Hayes?’ What they are really asking is ‘Do you accept the liabilities for ROGER HAYES the company (i.e. the person)?’ and when you say YES – you are unwittingly accepting the liabilities placed upon the ‘person’ (company) that they own and through which they establish their authority over you . How very clever and devious is that?

Roger Hayes is a flesh and blood man. ROGER HAYES is a person (company) – and they are separate entities. You control you, they control the person, if you accept the liability of the person – then they control you.

All Acts of Parliament are applied to the ‘person’ (the company), and not the man or the woman. This is self-evident in that the words man or women are never used in Acts of Parliament. So Acts do not therefore apply to the flesh and blood man or woman, if they did, they would say so. Acts of Parliament extend to you the man or woman only if and when (through your ignorance) you accept the responsibility and liability of the ‘person.’ When a policeman or a judge asks you for your name – they are tricking you into accepting their authority over you, because you have unwittingly assumed responsibility for the legal fiction (despite them also being ignorant of this fact) and the fact is that they must get you to acknowledge ‘the name’ i.e. ‘the person’ i.e. the ‘legal fiction’ ‘ROGER HAYES’ before they can assume their authority over you. When you say YES my name is ROGER HAYES, you are submitting/consenting to their authority, and conversely if you deny the liability of the corporate entity then you deny them the control that they need to enforce their penalty charge notices upon you. Denial of consent is denial of authority which means no penalties. It is as simple as that.

So now you know - government secures its authority over you by simply asking your name, or by getting you to fill in one of their forms. If you understand this then you can start to adjust the way in which you respond to their demands. Learn how to respond to this deceitful tyranny and your life will change; you will become freer in mind, in spirit and in reality. And the more of us pushing them back the faster we will take back control of our nation.

By denying the control that the legal fiction creates, you will be making an enormous stride in securing your freedom.

The fact remains that the Government and its institutions, i.e. the police, the courts, the taxman have authority over you by virtue of you unwittingly giving them your consent. But, whilst statutes (Acts of Parliament) apply only to the legal fiction – common law most definitely applies to YOU - the flesh and blood man or women. Be very careful to understand the difference. Common law which the police monitor as peace officers (constables) protects our natural rights, common law are the rules that govern how we behave towards our fellow men in order that we can all to live in peace and harmony with others without the threat of harm or loss.

So speeding, parking, council tax, VAT, PAYE etc all apply to the ‘legal fiction’ which you have an absolute right to reject if you so choose, but if standing up for your rights is too much trouble, you can chose to continue to remain compliant and obedient. Take your choice.

I have no objection to paying my fair share towards running a system of which we are all beneficiaries, but I will not be dictated to. If refusing to pay my council tax, speeding and parking fines is the way to bring about change that will benefit us all, then that is what I am going to do. Hopefully many more people will start thinking and acting like free men and women, the sooner we do then the sooner we will close down the tyranny and the sooner our lives will start to improve.

BUT... and there’s always a but, the ‘legal fiction’ has benefits as well as liabilities. The NHS, schooling, child benefits, land and home ownership, bank accounts etc, all come to you courtesy of the ‘legal fiction.’ If you want to dump the liabilities, you are potentially going to have to dump all the benefits as well. So you have to have a clear understanding on what it is you are letting yourself in for before you start messing with the system.

Dear reader, our controllers are not stupid... they have been working their scheme for a long time. They have devised a system that gives as well as it takes and it has been a careful balance of both of these that has allowed them to maintain their control. So if there are benefits as well as liabilities and we do not want to throw the baby out with the bath water, where do we go from here?

The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.

The writer has been in court (on numerous occasions) denying the liabilities of the legal fiction – to date 100% successfully. There have been some feisty moments - it has been an interesting journey during which compliant servants of the system have watched in bewilderment (and ignorance) as we (many friends and activists) have turned up at court and said NO... we do not accept your authority. The shock to authority is palpable; they respond by shouting, barking orders for us to obey, they use threats, intimidation and occasionally they call their security guards and the police to try and force us into submission – all to no avail. We have stood our ground and witnessed the weakening of their resolve and have watched as they have instead slowly started to submit to our authority. In court now, we ask the questions and they do the responding. They become particularly more compliant when we remind them that the courts belong to the people... not them. 

The flesh and blood man is considerably more powerful than their legal fiction controls; it is just a matter of discovering how it is that we can demonstrate our authority over them. It has been and will continue to be a bumpy ride, made smoother with the support of those who attend courts as witnesses. The British Constitution Group is pushing the tide of tyranny back slowly but surely, we do it with the knowledge that we are right and they are wrong as evidenced by their gradual submission to our demands. But we still have a long way to go. The more of us that join the fight, the faster we will take back control. We do not need elections or referendums or any other controlled mechanism to free ourselves from corrupt government be it in the UK or in Brussels [or the USA or Canada], we just need the spirit, determination and courage to stand up and say NO.

We, the British people [and the rest of the world] have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence... but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it... we do not.

We have become confused about our identity and our nationhood - we no longer understand the purpose of our constitution and the rule-of-law. Some of us have been fooled into thinking of ourselves as European [or American or Canadian], a universal description with as much meaning as calling ourselves earthlings. We are British – English, Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish [and other nationalities]. We have amongst us people from every country on earth, here to share in what is unique to these islands and the British people – a nation of tolerance, compassion, fortitude, fair play and justice. We have taken these values to the world – and it seems that the time has come to do so again.

Our future will not be determined by a political party, it will not be determined by puppets like Clegg, Cameron or Brown (remember him?)... our future will be forged by those amongst us who find the courage to stand up for our rights and declare them to the world.

The tyranny that has been build up around us will crumble when we stand up and defend ourselves. This is a game of numbers... when there are more of us than there are of them... the job will be done.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Freemasonry (Luciferianism): Basic Structure and Binding Oaths

The following provides a basic outline of how Freemasonry is structured and how members are committed by their oaths, as well as how members are introduced to Luciferianism in the higher degrees. It also lists other secret societies that are directly connected to Masonry through overlapping memberships, and explains a little bit about how they are connected and the differences between them. A list of references and suggested reading is also provided.

* * *

The entry level of Masonry is the Blue Lodge, which consists of the first three degrees:

  1) Entered Apprentice
  2) Fellowcraft
  3) Master Mason

During initiation into the 3rd degree, the following oath is made:

"Further, I will keep a worthy brother Master Mason's secrets inviolable, when communicated to and received by me as such, murder and treason excepted. Further, I will not cheat, wrong or defraud a Master Mason's Lodge, nor a brother of this Degree, knowingly, nor supplant him in any of his laudable undertakings, but will give him due and timely notice, that he may ward off all danger."

After this degree has been attained, if a Master Mason wants to continue advancing, he can choose either the York Rite or the Scottish Rite.

The York Rite has ten additional degrees (4th to 13th), and is more oriented to Christians.

The Scottish Rite has twenty-nine additional degrees (4th to 32rd), and is more oriented to deism (a belief in the existence of a supreme being, specifically of a creator who does not intervene in the universe). 

A 33rd degree is offered in the Scottish Rite as an honorary degree to selected candidates. They must be invited to join.

As a Mason advances by degrees through either the York or Scottish Rites, they are slowly indoctrinated further into deism, and ultimately into Luciferianism.

In both the York and Scottish Rites, the Royal Arch degree is where the Mason makes the following oath:

"I will aid and assist a companion Royal Arch Mason when engaged in any difficulty, and espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, if within my power, whether he be right or wrong."

This includes any criminal act, including murder or treason.

Masons who reach the Royal Arch degree also swear to promote and vote for any fellow Mason of that degree "before any other of equal qualifications."

Members of the Royal Arch degree can be found throughout the justice system, serving as judges, lawyers, and police officers. This means that a Royal Arch Mason can expect favourable treatment by the courts should he ever find himself in trouble. 

In some Lodges, a Mason who enters the Scottish Rite is given a copy of Morals and Dogma, which they are expected to read. This book was written by Albert Pike, who served as the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the USA from 1850 to 1891 and is still considered to be a leading authority on Masonry. The book provides the moral teachings of Freemasonry, which the reader will soon discover from reading it that Masonry is Luciferianism.

Albert Pike has indicated elsewhere in his writings that the 30th, 31st, and 32nd degrees are to be taught the Luciferian doctrine. In speaking to the 33rd degree, he says:

"You may repeat it to the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees — The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine."

Another 33rd degree Mason and leading authority on Freemasonry was Manly P. Hall. In his book, The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, he wrote:

"When the Mason learns the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of the living power, he has learned the mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy."

These are just a few examples to show that Freemasonry is Luciferian at the highest levels. Many other examples exist besides these.

* * *

At the highest levels, Masonry is intimately tied to a number of other secret societies through overlapping memberships. These other secret societies include but are not limited to:

Order of the Illuminati
Order of the Garter    
Knights of Malta
Opus Dei
Council on Foreign Relations
Trilateral Commission
Knights of Columbus
Skull & Bones
Golden Dawn
Ordo Templi Orientis
Church of Satan
Temple of Set

These secret societies each have their own internal structures, doctrines, and areas of influence, with some being more politically-oriented while others are more mystical/theological, but they all serve the same Luciferian New World Order agenda.

The Order of the Illuminati
“The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment, let it never appear, in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is fitter than the three lower degrees of Freemasonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it.” -- Adam Weishaupt
This Order was founded by Adam Weishaupt in 1776, under the direction of the House of Rothschild. By 1782, an alliance was formed at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad in Germany between Illuminati, Freemasonry, and a number of other leading secret societies (Rosicrucians and Theosophists), uniting no less than three million members worldwide.

The Order of the Illuminati has always been made up (in part) of the highest-ranking Masons. It is a very elite group made up of the world's richest and most powerful movers and shakers, who operate on a global level and only from the shadows. Like with the honorary 33rd degree of Freemasonry, candidates can only be invited to join. New members can be invited in from the upper ranks of some of these other secret societies as well. All new members of the Illuminati must take an oath to put their loyalty to that secret society above that of any other oath they might have taken or will ever take.

John Robison, another authority on Freemasonry of the 33rd degree who was invited to join the Illuminati, reveals their oath of initiation in his book, Proofs of a Conspiracy (pg. 71), part of which reads:

"I bind myself to perpetual silence and unshaken loyalty and submission to the Order..."

Rosicrucians and Theosophists are also Luciferian, as many of their published doctrines will show. Their highest ranking members can also be selected for membership in the Illuminati.

Albert Pike was a high ranking Rosicrucian (and probably also an Illiminatus) prior to ever joining the Freemasons. Similarly, most or all other 33rd degree Masons are also high-ranking members in one or more of these other secret societies. In this way, these groups are all intimately linked together and controlled by a relatively small group of people.

The ultimate goal of these secret societies is to create a single world government and force the world's population to adopt a single religion that's based on their Luciferian doctrines.

With the aid of Freemasons, the Illuminati have been responsible for starting the French Revolution of 1789, the Russian Revolution of 1917, World War I, and World War II. They intend for there to be a third world war, after which they will enact the final stage of their plan to create a single world government. The Duke De'Orleans, Karl Marx, Nikolai Lenin, and Adolph Hitler were all heavily involved with secret societies and were ultimately under the control of the Illuminati.

The Origins of Freemasonry

The English Grand Lodge of Freemasonry was founded by members of the English Order of the Rose Croix (Rosicrucians). It works only the first three degrees – Apprentice, Fellow-Craft, and Master Mason – and constitutes the nursery for the selection of initiates for the higher degrees worked by other Lodges, such as the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rites and the Grand Orient. The Grand Lodge therefore only teaches the exoteric doctrines (known as Blue Masonry), reserving the esoteric teachings for other Lodges. In 1813 it added a fourth degree, that of Holy Royal Arch. After the English Lodge’s founding, men of religious persuasions other than Christianity began to be accepted into Masonry. On initiation, each member is given an alias that they will be known by within the Lodge. The secret oath taken by initiates supercedes all other oaths that they have or might ever take, thereby making their first allegiance to the Order and their fellow Masons. This oath continues even if they decide to leave Freemasonry, in order to assure that whatever secrets they might hold regarding the inner workings of Masonry are never divulged. All Masonry is founded on the principle of helping fellow members over helping non-members. Because of this, after the English Grand Lodge was established, it became almost necessary for any person in London to become a Mason in order to succeed in business.

To secure the inner workings of Freemasonry against the higher morals of its members, once in the higher degrees, a member who is found to be intractable can continue to the highest visible point of initiation along the track prepared by those who mean him to know nothing. All is beautiful, all is noble, he sees only the best, and forever advertises the goodness of Freemasonry. Though in this capacity he may do nothing else, he becomes an important factor in recruiting.

Under the guise of philanthropy, humanitarianism, democratic ideals, and the promise of material advancement, this Order attracts untold numbers of unsuspecting men. The sifting takes place from the time of their initiation. For those who are deemed useless to the further secret aims of Masonry and therefore unworthy of climbing from the Master's chair in Grand Lodge to The Royal Arch degree, English Masonry will always remain what it was represented to be when they became candidates for initiation. They will be useful carriers of the legend that English Masonry believes in God and philanthropy. But, like Charity, English Grand Lodge covers a multitude of sins.... Above all, it covers Gnosticism under all its aspects; it is in fact its screen.
(See Occult Theocracy, by Lady Queenborough Edith Starr Miller) 

* * *


Morals and Dogmas - Albert Pike
The Secret Teachings of All Ages - Manly P. Hall
The Lost Keys of Freemasonry - Manly P. Hall
Proofs of a Conspiracy - John Robison

Suggested Reading:

New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies - William T. Still

Further Resources:

Sunday, September 25, 2016

CONTROLLED OPPOSITION - Preliminary Notes and References

This document is a work in progress. It provides some information from other sources on the subject of 'controlled opposition' and how it is used in the media to control public opinion. My own notes are added throughout. 

* * * * *

DEFINITION: A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries. Notably Vladimir Lenin who said ''"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."

That's just the mainstream definition. It isn't just protest movements covertly led by government agents any more. Controlled opposition has many approaches. Some of them are quite sophisticated and unsuspecting, while others are so simple and so obvious that it's a wonder that they work as well as they do. 

* * * * *

Operation Mockingbird was a secret campaign by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to influence media. Begun in the 1950s....


Operation Mockingbird marked the official start of the US government's infiltration of the news and entertainment media. Of course, all this really means is that a lot of editors, writers, reporters, and film makers were recruited as intelligence assets, made to sign secrecy oaths, and thereafter were under the control of their new masters. 

* * * * *


It evolved with the CIA’s MKULTRA Program to restrain populations opposed to matters of political importance. Thus, nearly everyone became a member of what is called 'Controlled Opposition'. The COINTELPRO engineers this state using mass media hypnosis–broadcasting distracting, conflicting, and confusing propaganda.

There has been a covert intelligence operating–a CULTural black-op–that has undermined leaders, and directed “fan mentality,”  on all levels. . . .

Fear-induction by agents of deception, including “news anchors,” generate mass confusion, over-stimulation, and general apathy that plagues us socially, politically and economically.

The devil-doers manipulate by means of  fraud, misrepresentations, and omissions, and We The People become afraid to voice our opinions and react remedially, reasonably, and responsibly.

This is why the root cause of what ails us is the COINTELPRO–a psychological operation by organized criminals producing “controlled opposition” throughout society, disabling society. This treason is administered through grass-roots organizations and institutions by the agents of deception; including a few of these exposed below.

(Alex Jones, David Icke, Ted Gunderson, etc.)

Ted Gunderson told Alex Jones, “I was very active in the COINTELPRO program. Particularly the [media] back East during the 1960s,  and through the Vietnam War. You know we used it against them [the media and activists] and it was very effective. And it’s very effective today. And they’re using it today.  But what they’re doing today, makes the old COINTELPRO program by the FBI back in the 60s. look like a Sunday school class. These guys today are unbelievable. I mean their brazen, they’re violating the law. They’re coming out and trying to set people up. . . . What they’re doing is, they’ve infiltrated every group in America. They’ve got their own people in there; their own informants; their own provocateurs in there. And they’re going to stir-em-up. . . . Their provocateurs are going to come up with the idea of doing some violent acts."

[T]he controlled opposition psyops works to discredit each other, everything, and everyone. Predicate felons discredit racists; and “doctors” with no real credentials are promoted by discredited medical colleagues. Everyone demonizes everyone else in the COINTELPRO, in following Michael Aquino’s “Helter Skelter” satanic protocol.

To begin, the gang operates to co-create one-another’s credibility and celebrity. Then they feud, creating fake, and then deceived opposition as unwitting persons choose sides in frivolous controversies generating rhetorical debates. Then these agents discredit everything and everyone involved in the debate by publishing or broadcasting fraudulent claims, lacking material evidence, such as the alien invasion of humanity involving the Illuminati’s takeover by extraterrestrials. 

This is how they generate the end result of mass confusion, degeneration of the CULTure, and general apathy undermining activism–that is the socio-political objective of Controlled Opposition. This is how the grand distraction and gross deception operates for public persuasion and population manipulation. Any activist attempting to make progress in their chosen cause confronts this conspiracy reality draining their passion.

This is one of the main reasons for COINTELPRO’s nepotism–why these agents, including so-called “doctors,” “natural medicine” leaders, and “consumer advocates,” regularly interview each other, build each other’s blogs and credibility to feign their legitimacy, then self-destruct, taking people’s confidence and progressive movements with them.

* * * * *

A. Official story:
CIA/FBI were incompetent; Bush and/or Clinton were complacent.
B. Official Lame Conspiracy:
CIA/FBI were incompetent; Bush/Cheney maybe let it happen; Israelis Knew.
C. Official LIHOP Conspiracy:
CIA/FBI were compromised; Bush/Cheney did let it happen; Israelis Helped.
D. Official LIHOP Wild Conspiracy:
CIA/FBI compromised; Bush/Cheney/Neocons let it happen; Israelis Did It.
E. Official LIHOP Tinfoil Conspiracy:
Israelis/Neocons/Bush/Cheney Did It; CIA/FBI looked the other way.
F. Official MIHOP 'Serious' Conspiracy:
Israelis/Neocons/CIA/FBI/Bush/Cheney/Military-Industrial-Complex Did It.
G. Official Loony Conspiracies:
Rothschilds and/or Rockefellers and/or CFR and/or Bildebergers did it.
Jews and Jewish bankers -who already run everything- did it.
Satanists, Opus Dei or Reptilians did it.
It's a terrific variety of theories.

It plays out something like this:
The mainstream media push version A; hint at B; sneer at G.
The controlled right/intellectual media pushes version B.
The controlled left/intellectual media pushes version C.
The 'moderate' Fake internet sites push versions C and D.
The 'softcore' Fake internet sites push versions D and E.
The 'independent' Fake internet sites push version F.
The 'loony' Fake interent sites push variations of version G.

But every single one, from A to G are OFFICIAL versions, sanctioned and promoted by the 9/11 intelligence coverup operation and their CIA Fakes network. They have a flavor for every market.

The creation of this multiplicity of explanations is a core element of the coverup. Left to their own devices, people on the Internet might have figured out the truth themselves. But with this circus in action, there is always plenty of distraction and lots of division in opinion.

The intelligence coverup is not trying to stop 9/11 conspiracy theories on the internet. It's creating them. Then playing off supporters of the different theories against each other. That's a classic Cointelpro-style tactic.

The perpetrators knew that a sizeable segment of people were going to be pretty sure 9/11 was not as it seems. They don't mind that, for now. The immediate objectives are first, to to stop these skeptical views from gaining hold in mainstream opinion. Second, to prevent a coherent view forming which could convince a much broader number of people -particularly those on the political left.

* * * * *

These people are all over the Internet They are all over the 9/11 issue; all over the 'stolen' election of 2004; behind the psychological operations designed to inspire fear of earth changes, of global warming, of the Super-State and the so-called New World Order; all over the landscape of anti-corporate, anti-fascist expression on the Internet.

This army of information controllers is all over the 'free' information you are getting on the Internet. Time we opened our eyes to see them. It's not just the mainstream which is controlled. From the moment the Internet became prominent, a vast budget has been expended to control all the high-trafficked intersections on the information superhighway.

Many of these sites/assets were put in place long before 9/11. A key goal was to ensure that if some truth must come out, it will be a truth designed and controlled by intelligence agencies --with agency assets in a position to ensure misdirection and damage limitation.

To this end, an orgy of evidence [See Minority Report Part I] in the form of deliberately misleading 9/11 'clues', were designed into the 9/11 operation from the start --to give these assets prearranged talking points with which to fill their column inches and programming. This has served to confuse and confound.

A persistent theme of the disinformation spread by these assets is to portray the machinations of this elite group acting through the CIA/NSA/ETC. as if they originate from somewhere other than the US security/intelligence apparatus.

Suspicion is directed instead onto the Israelis, the 'City of London', 'International Bankers', The Rockefellers, The Bildebergers, and most infamously, the ill-defined, so-called New World Order. Of course, some of these elements are complicit in certain events, but the aim is to downplay the U.S. establishment's guiding hand and the broad CFR/corporate support.

* * * * *

Examples of some possible (high profile) controlled opposition:

Alex Jones
Donald Trump
Edward Snowden/Glenn Greenwald

Controlled opposition (CO) is dependent on a person or group that is already recognized among the public. From my list we can see that some high-profile CO agents might have already developed a large supportive following (Alex Jones), some might be in a position to create the illusion of a large supportive following (Donald Trump), and some might appear to have forced themselves into the public arena (Anonymous, Edward Snowden, and ISIS). The most significant common denominator here is that they wield a lot of public attention so their influence is comparatively huge. 

With most CO agents, this isn't so much the case. They don't depend on publicity to achieve their ends. They operate almost exclusively online and are only there to make noise, disrupt public discussions on selected subjects, and spread propaganda. They serve as thought police, whereas high-profile CO agents most often serve as opinion leaders and are far fewer in number. 

The public recognition of a high-profile CO agent or group doesn't have to be favourable, but being controversial and/or focusing on controversial subjects certainly helps. The main purpose of the controversy is to attract enough attention to get people's interest (based on its entertainment value, at the very least) in order that they will hear the intended message and react to it (form a belief or make a decision based on it). In these cases, the initial interest a person takes isn't necessarily related to any particular issue that's being presented so much as it is the controversial nature of the person presenting it. This is why Donald Trump, Anonymous, and Edward Snowden all hold a lot of public interest in spite of who they are or what their message might be. Once the message is heard, opinions will be formed about it based on the appeal of the presenter as much as on anything else. 

We can see from my list that CO agents might have different uses: 

- Alex Jones acting as controlled opposition to whoever pays him to say what they want. 

- Trump acting as controlled opposition to Clinton in order to assure that Clinton wins the presidency. 

- Anonymous acting as controlled opposition to the 1% in order to provide an outlet for future news 'leaks' that can be used to shape or control events in their favour. 

- Edward Snowden acting as controlled opposition to the US government in order to provide an outlet for future information 'leaks' that can be used as distractions from more significant newsworthy events. 

- ISIS acting as controlled opposition to UN forces in order to provide an excuse for continued wars, keeping arms manufacturers like Lockheed Martin in business with long-term government contracts worth billions of dollars. 

* * * * *

Some high-profile CO agents (i.e. an Alex Jones or Edward Snowden) will initially introduce information that legitimizes them among their target audience. This information will appear to expose something controversial, and an expectation that more information might be forthcoming from that same source ensures that they will continue to receive attention from that audience for an extended period of time. Once they've established themselves as a 'legitimate source', anything they produce will be more easily passed off as accurate. Very often, these types of CO agents can eventually be identified by the fact that they never reveal anything more than the initial information that brought them to the attention of their audience. 

* * * * *

Low-profile CO agents that you'll commonly meet online will often appear to be extremely patriotic, but they're also against individual rights and freedoms (i.e. freedom of expression). They work for an entity that doesn't value individual rights and freedoms and instead demands unquestioned loyalty, This is a distinguishing characteristic of these agents that can be used to identify them quickly and route them out. 

* * * * *

The media itself, in all its many forms, has become controlled opposition. Without it, we wouldn't have 'news' issues constantly thrust at us, demanding our attention. We're led to believe that they're important messages that threaten our peace and security, or they promise to offer advantages to us in hearing them, but they rarely do. Even the entertainment industry incorporates CO into its stream of endless presentations, as do the advertising and marketing industries. The media acts as controlled opposition by keeping us distracted with issues that those in control want us to focus on, while important issues closer to home and more meaningful to our lives become ignored. This helps to lead to social breakdowns that can then be rectified by those in control through methods that will only lead us to further dependency on them. In this case (with the media), the CO is the equivalent of mass hypnosis, where an illusory world plays out parallel to the real world, interweaving ideas and events to create a distorted and highly confused understanding of what's really going on. 

The media was created in order to enforce controlled opposition on the masses. 

* * * * *

A look at Snowden's background raises some red flags:

- He enlisted in the US Army as a Special Forces recruit but was discharged after breaking both legs in a training accident, which is an uncommon reason for discharge.

- He next found work as a security guard.
- Soon after this he somehow landed a job with the CIA dealing with information technology security (without having any prior training or experience).
- Unexplainable placement in a security position he's not qualified for.
- Moved on from the CIA and began doing contract jobs through Booz Allen Hamilton (this put him at the NSA).
- He was supposedly able to grab a very large amount of very sensitive information from the most highly secured government agency in the world after only being employed there for a few months.
- He was apparently earning between $120,000 and $200,000 a year, which he gave up to go into hiding, be labelled a traitor, become an enemy of the most vengeful government in the world, and be forced to live the remainder of his life in a foreign country, away from all friends and family, completely dependent on that country's continuous support
- He was able to escape to Hong Kong and then Moscow without much worry about being picked up along the way, in spite of the global surveillance and monitoring systems he supposedly 'exposed'
- Nothing he has revealed is really new informatio
- As a government whistleblower, he has been given unprecedented media coverage


* * * * *

Controlled opposition includes using false flag operations to sway public opinion or to distract from other issues. A long list of such events, posed as terrorist attacks or lone-nut shootings, have been occurring at an increasing rate, with seemingly less and less concern by the perpetrators (not the patsies) of being discovered, stopped, and punished. Media collusion and the quick destruction of evidence after equally quick investigations makes independent investigations impossible. 

A google search for "role players" and "crisis actors" reveals that there are many companies (mostly military contractors) that regularly hire people for such positions. Very little details are ever given in the job postings. Crisis actors and other role players have been identified in various false flag 'news' events, such as Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing. 

Government documents relating to planning and preparation of emergency drills reveal that these drills involve full scale 'live' enactments with full media coverage and medical response.


* * * * *

The FBI has admitted to setting up potential terrorists. They scout out prospective patsies (often in online forums), talk them into performing the act, help them plan it out, supply them with weapons and whatever else they need, and then bust them in the act to receive the praise and promotions.

A dossier of such cases can be found at this link:

The FBI targets the "disgruntled few" who would participate in a terrorist plot if given the opportunity, according to Aaronson. In many cases, the FBI recruits potential terrorists and provides them with plans, equipment, and weapons — before finally shutting them down and getting credit for thwarting another attack.


* * * * *

Another form of controlled opposition is to use SSRI drugs to dissolve the memories of surviving victims and witnesses of these illegal government false flag operations (at least where there are REAL casualties). These drugs often lead to increased depression and suicide, as has been the case among victims and witnesses of the Columbine shooting in its aftermath.

Ever since the OKC bombing in 1995, teams of government psychiatrists, psychologists, doctors, and councillors have been routinely assigned to handle the surviving victims and witnesses of these crimes and make sure they have plenty of the latest and most powerful pharmaceuticals on hand to deaden their thoughts and feelings and help them forget what happened. 

* * * * *


Half of the students didn't show up for school that day. At the hospital, Mark and Donna [Taylor] were warned [by the authorities] to keep quiet about the attack because there may be additional killers on the loose who will come after them if they talk.

Immediately after the shooting they started "Columbine Connections". They were ready with psychologists to convince the victims and their families to take psychiatric drugs to calm them down.

"Columbine Connections" was set up for counseling, and it was encouraging psychiatric drugs. The mail for the victims was sent to this organization, and they would open the mail.

Some more information on this organization from the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office:

A doctor, Bill Deagle, who treated some people after the Oklahoma City bombing, would travel to the Taylor house to provide medical services. He would encourage drug use, and would talk about the government putting chips under people's skin. 

This doctor is the host of a radio show called The NutriMedical Report

Some students hung themselves after the shooting. 

Some people have definitely improved from psychiatric drugs, but other people get worse with them.

Some antidepressants come with warnings that they may increase depression or suicidal thoughts. 

Donna Taylor says that many of the people at Columbine were taking these drugs, and it was making them worse, not better.

Donna Taylor took the psychiatric drugs for one year after the shooting. She complained the drug would make her hallucinate. 

* * * * *

Mark Taylor had been quite outspoken about what he saw at Columbine that didn't fit with the official story. In 2008 or thereabouts, he was allegedly framed for sending a bomb threat to a book store and ended up being sent to a mental facility where he was drugged into a perpetual zombie state. An online video exists showing his state before and after his incarceration. He appears to have been lobotomized. 

* * * * *

Dave Thomas was the Jefferson County District Attorney during the time of the Columbine massacre in 1999. He was also the DA during the time of the (still-unsolved) JonBenet Ramsey murder in 1996, and had been responsible for blocking the Boulder police's investigation of that crime. 

* * * * *

Dr. Bill Deagle, the doctor who was treating victim Mark Taylor and his family after the Columbine massacre, has an interesting background. He claims to have the inside scoop on all this Orwellian government activity going on, but he destroys any credibility he might otherwise have by pushing New Age BS and wacky conspiracy ideas that any serious researcher would agree were utter nonsense. He even has his own internet radio talk show set up for promoting his ideas. 

When I first read what Mark Taylor's mother reported (about Bill Deagle and everything she said about there being other shooters), the thought crossed my mind that maybe she was a CO agent, injecting false information to make serious researchers look foolish for believing it. That would mean that her son Mark would have to be in on it. That would mean that he was never really shot 7 times while in full public view on the school field while police and students watched. That would mean that the whole thing was staged. But I just don't believe that. So this Bill Deagle issue provides an important insight into the sort of people that these orchestrators of terror involve in their scripted psyops. 

* * * * *


In February 2002, for example, while teaching at another bioterrorism conference in St. Louis, Deagle says he spent three days "with Delta Force and Special Ops guys, all of them saying that our own government was in control and pulling the strings of terrorism. They warned me that the next event was going to be a radiological event involving six major cities, including Chicago, Denver, Atlanta, Seattle, Boston and San Diego."

Coincidentally, Deagle says he also treated a government worker who'd become ill while working inside massive, city-sized government tunnels and underground facilities in Colorado and Mexico. According to Deagle, there are more than 4,000 of these clandestine underground cities worldwide, including in and around 132 US cities. His patient, he says, "told me about things going on there, literally involving people from out of this world."

Deagle explained it during a recent speech in Vancouver, "I was called, not only as a doctor and a scientist—but also as a prophet." He has claimed he is, in fact, one of the two end-of-days prophetic witnesses identified in Revelations 11:3—"And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth..."

Taylor's mother would later break off relations with Deagle, complaining "he tried to control me and my son. It got deeper and deeper. It was insane," says Donna Taylor. She began to believe Deagle was "nuts."

She was also concerned about the number of medications he was prescribing to her son.

On March 11, 2004, the Colorado State Medical Board temporarily suspended his medical licence after investigating three separate incidents in which Deagle had allegedly over-prescribed a pharmacopia of drugs.

The twin towers of Deagle's own mini-empire focus on two seemingly separate but strangely interconnected websites—the CLAYandIRON Ministry, "commissioned by the Most High God & to bring the truth of the end of this Secular Age and prepare His People spiritually and physically for the Times of Jacob's Troubles," and Nutrimedicals Inc., a site that sells a typically prosaic assortment of vitamins and pills

What brings the two together is Deagle's daily two-hour weekday afternoon show on the Genesis Communication Network, a US-based internet radio station that features many of the big names in global conspiracy. From a makeshift studio in his Halifax home, Deagle takes—very—occasional calls from listeners, ramblingly reinterprets current news events to fit his own perspective and somehow manages to mingle conspiracy theories with plugs for his nutritional supplements.

Consider the following, delivered straight-faced and without inflection, to listeners at the Granada Forum: "All roads do lead to Rome," he said, appearing to read from the text on his laptop computer screen. "All kings and rulers are subject to the Jesuit general, the black Pope. Zionism is just an apostate arm of the Bablyonian Talmudic Satanism, subject to the Vatican. Spiritual dark lords of blood and sexual sacrifice are identical with IFEs—Identified Fiendish Entities. And they exist. In the astral plane. And the physical..."

He also claims, of course, to have been a member of what he calls "the inner circle," a claim some of those in the conspiracy world who interview him are quick to pick up on on. Alex Jones, who hosts another popular internet radio all-conspiracy-all-the-time program, introduced Deagle on his show as a man who had "worked for the government at every level...So much of his bio is classified..."

Deagle plays on the power of that mystery, claiming American Special Ops buddies and contacts in high places who tell him things unknown even to the most plugged in. "Senators on the armed forces committee," he boasted to Jones's listeners, "don't know what I know."

Deagle claimed his brother-in-law is the "executive assistant to our premier in Nova Scotia, where I live right now." That much is true...well, more or less. Michelle's brother, Wayne Fiander, is a former Tory candidate and current special advisor to premier Rodney MacDonald. 

Even within the mainstream conspiracy movement—and, post Iraqi-weapons-of-mass-destruction, there's nothing particularly "out there," of course, about questioning whether the American government is really telling the whole truth about 9/11, or anything else—many worry that Deagle's never-ending web-spiral of ever greater conspiracies is undermining their legitimate questions, and some even wonder if Deagle himself is part of a misinformation conspiracy to discredit them.

* * * * *

One of the main angles being used as controlled opposition to the elite's Orwellian plans for our future is the claim that a growing segment of the population (i.e. the uneducated and poor) is becoming increasingly psychotic. By the mid-1990s, new types of pharmaceutical drugs were suddenly being prescribed to more and more people (mostly youth) who were being labelled with new types of mental diseases that were being identified (i.e. undesirable mental states caused by new types of social pressures and poor early nurturing in broken homes). These drugs have proven time and again to increase psychotic tendencies in many people. One only has to watch the ads on TV to understand how bad these drugs are, many of them having a long list of negative side effects that include depression, violence, and suicide. 

Since 9/11, independent investigators, researchers, and anyone else who goes looking for answers or voices their opinions about all these controversial events going on in the world is automatically labelled a 'conspiracy theorist', and the government goes out of its way to besmirch that label while mainstream media mouthpieces avoid any reasoned discussions about their claims. Meanwhile, we find that many of the people that the government hires to do their dirty work in these covert ops are some of the wackiest conspiracy theorists out there. 

Consider the idea that a guy like Deagle might be used for more than just handing out pills like candy. He might be there to purposely adulterate the drugged minds of his patient-victims with the same New Age ideas he promotes, leading them into the illusion that they have also been 'specially chosen' like him to fight the 'evil overlords', and then recruiting them as role-players and crisis actors in the next false flag operation, or setting them loose online to spread their crazy BS among more reasoned discussion groups in order to disrupt them and steer other people away. 

These people have to come from somewhere not normal to be willing to take part in these sometimes fake, sometimes not-so-fake terrorist events. 

* * * * *

From :

The filter bubble—the idea that online recommendation engines learn what we like and thus keep us only reading things we agree with—has evolved. Algorithms, network effects, and zero-cost publishing are enabling crackpot theories to go viral, and—unchecked—these ideas are impacting the decisions of policy makers and shaping public opinion, whether they are verified or not.

[W]e've reached the point where social networks are now used as primary news outlets. Seeking news from traditional sources—newspapers and magazines—has been replaced with a new model: getting all of one’s news from trending stories on social networks. The people that we know best are most likely to influence us because we trust them. Their ideas and beliefs shape ours. And the tech behind social networks is built to enhance this.

We are long past merely partisan filter bubbles and well into the realm of siloed communities that experience their own reality and operate with their own facts.

Since nearly half of web-using adults now get their news from Facebook in any given week, what counts as "truth" on our social platforms matters. When nonsense stories gain traction, they’re extremely difficult to correct. And stories jump from platform to platform, reaching new audiences and "going viral" in ways and at speeds that were previously impossible.

[T]he Internet doesn’t just reflect reality anymore; it shapes it. The mere fact of these theories being online and discoverable helps create this phenomenon.

* * * * *

What are some of the most popular alternative news and conspiracy websites? 

Reddit, DavidIcke, Project Avalon, Project Camelot, InfoWars, PrisonPlanet, BeforeItsNews, RumorMillNews, AboveTopSecret, GodLikeProductions, LetsRollForums, LunaticOutpost, etc.

Every one of these sites I've listed -- as well as many others that are just as popular -- is infiltrated with CO agents. Some, such as AboveTopSecret and GodLikeProductions, are apparently run by CO agents. This becomes evident from reading the many first-hand testimonials that can be found with a simple Google search. 

If you try to post intelligently thought out opinions about things that are commonly discussed on these sites, you just might find yourself quickly ostracized and blocked from posting on them once you say the wrong thing and it comes on their radar. 

Like many other writers and researchers, I have found myself suddenly blocked by many of these sites before I could even register with them. GodLikeProducrtions is so careful not to let me see what's on their site that they have set it up so I can't even view their forums any more. With other sites, my registration just doesn't go through, so I can't sign on. And still with other sites, there's just no connection and the little cursor just spins and spins as the page tries unsuccessfully to load. 

This is the sort of technological method being used to deflect unwanted voices from interfering with the distortions of truth and utter madness that these sites produce and promote. It is another form of controlled opposition. 

This short video is worth checking out. The last few minutes describe what I've just said in the last few paragraphs and briefly explains how these sites weed out real truth seekers:

Here's another one that adds some more information on how these controlled websites remove people: who spread information they don't want people to know about. Be sure to read all the subtitles while you listen to the person talking:

This one is apparently from Anonymous. They traced AboveTopSecret' to Langley, VA, home of the CIA:

ATS node name is listed and maintained by the government.

IP Address:

Node Name Gov-bb21-lan-14 Gov-bb22-lan-15 Gov-bb23-lan-16
Location Langley, Virginia MS 60


* * * * *


Banning a user from a web forum in such a way that the banned user is unaware of the ban. Usually takes the form of showing that user's posts/profile/etc. only to that user; other users never see them. Considered underhanded chicken-shit behavior.

* * * * *