Why do you collect targeting information from TIs? How is this information used? How do you screen out false or delusional claims that might otherwise hurt TI's chances of getting real help or which help to make the entire TI community look like a bunch of fools who will believe anything they might read or hear? Or do you even bother to? Why do you encourage TIs to send their stories to government bodies, no matter how unbelievable they might be? Do you think that this helps TIs in any way? Do you think that it encourages TIs to be believed?
Isn't it possible that you could actually be monitoring TIs for the government perps who run the mind-control and targeting programs, and that you're looking for certain types of people that would be good candidates for various mind-control programs? And speaking of mind-control, why isn't any information about the psychological techniques that are commonly used included with all the other material you have on your website? Is it because you don't want TIs to be aware of these techniques? Why do you promote material from the likes of Robert Duncan, who has absolutely no credibility to speak of (I checked), who has even admitted on a mailing list that you and other FFCHS directors belonged to to being a perp, a liar, and a paid government infiltrator (I have the evidence), and whose claims about the technologies he describes deserve the closer scrutiny that he continually avoids? Psychological mind-control techniques are directly related to targeting as much or more so than the technology he promotes as real, and mind-control is one of the essential objectives in most or all targeting programs. Being able to identify these techniques should be the first step taken in avoiding the intended result of targeting, whether it be through electronic technologies or anything else. If you had any credibility as an advocate for TIs, you would know this. You also completely ignore the issue of COINTELPRO tactics (and even engage in them yourself), and these are very important for every TI to learn about and understand if they want to avoid the many purposeful traps that are constantly being laid by government perps to derail efforts at exposing these organized targeting programs. You only reflect certain parts of the whole picture on your site and through your published material, and for such an organization as yours, prominently positioned in the TI community and filled as it is with 'ex'-government agents from such unscrupulous agencies as the NSA, DOD, etc., who should therefore be quite familiar with COINTELPRO tactics, and claiming to be going to all this effort for all these years to help TIs, I'd think that these things would be very obvious to you and just as important to inform TIs about as anything else you promote as fact.
Of course, at this point I don't expect you to actually be considrate enough to provide any answers to my very valid questions, given the fact that you've consistently failed to do so in the past, both with me and with anyone else who has asked you these sorts of very important questions that deserve straight answers. Instead, you responded in typical COINTELPRO fashion by posting an announcement on your website warning TIs about 'organizations' who seek only to destroy your credibility, and state that you're 'saddened' that you can't unite with them (whoever they are, you don't bother to say), but you offer no means for an open dialogue to resolve what are surely important issues in your own mind regarding how you reflect on the TI community. I would ask you to at least name the parties you call 'organizations' (since I'm told by a number of your long-time members that you consider me to be one of them, even though I'm just one person and certainly not anything that could be called an organization), and explain how their (and my) attempts to establish your credibility can be interpreted as attempts to discredit you. After all, YOU have done nothing in the entire time that FFCHS has been around that would establish your own credibility, or that of the people that you work most closely with (such as Robert Duncan, Julianne McKinney, Max Williams, Timothy White, Ken Wilbourne Jr., etc.) , and so it's come to the point that many of us in the TI community are wondering if you have any credibility at all. Hiding from doing so and making excuses not to only ends up making you look worse in the end. Your track record at being unsuccessful at whatever you endeavor to do as an organization, aside from promoting yourself and certain purposely disorienting disinformation that already heavily permeates the TI community, leads to the conclusion that you are not capable of your self-appointed task and are actually damaging the credibility of real TIs rather than helping them. You owe it to the tax-payers to justify the continuation of your organization's existence as a non-profit establishment, since you, Derrick Robinson, have been personally taking advantage of it through the proceeeds and privileges that it brings you, whether legally or not.
And speaking of legalities, after having looked at your non-profit status bylaws, I understand that your organization is NOT entitled to seek membership fees or involve itself in disseminating propaganda of any sort, and yet you do both of these things and little of anything else. The sort of material you consistently publish and promote (whether directly or indirectly through others who work with you) raises many questions as to its accuracy and the real purpose for promoting it, but since you and anyone who works with your organization refuses to discuss any of this material in order to establish its accuracy, it stands to reason that it is propaganda, since it fits well within that definition and has a definite negative influence on people's perceptions of the truth that could only be advantageous to the perpetrators of all this targeting and mind-control. Only by being open enough to discuss this material can it be shown to be true or false, and this seems to be the only reason that you and those who work with you avoid engaging in such discussions. You KNOW its propaganda, and that promoting it is necessary to your continued personal financial arrangements. Promoting the propagandist material you do is enough for you to lose your non-profit status. The fact that you collect membership fees and spend most of it on yourself is another. What will the IRS do when they find out about all this, as they surely will? If you lose your organization as a financial foundation for you to live off of, where do you plan to sleep at night, Derrick? In your janitor's closet?
It's time you came forward and dealt with the many questions that you have raised in the minds of real TIs. Hiding from them while accusing anyone who asks them of attempting to discredit you is such a weak cop-out! If you want to unite with others, as you stated, you have to show some credibility by your words and actions, which you never have in all the time your organization has existed. Otherwise you're just a criminal and a coward, and more obviously seen as working for the government perpetrators.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Are All the People at FFCHS That Stupid??? Or Do They Think TIs Are?
While
researching the backgrounds of the various people connected to FFCHS,
I came across a few things that are quite interesting.
I could say a lot about some of the hypocritical things he says here as they pertain to his own actions, but that would distract from what I’m attempting to point out. The important thing is that he admitted to these people that still work with him even now that he’s a perp who is set on deceiving people. Nothing further needs to be said about this here, since it couldn’t be stated more clearly, right out of the horse’s (or asses) mouth.
This time, however, Julianne McKinney’s response is completely different than before, even suspicious in her easy acceptance of Robert Duncan’s bizarre confession:
At the very least, all of this should make you question why any of these people continue to work with Robert Duncan at all and why they are not more careful about who they work with, given their knowledge of COINTELPRO tactics. Robert Duncan proves himself time and again to be completely off his rocker, even sociopathic, and is therefore NOT suited to represent or help TIs in any manner whatsoever! And if these other people are so naïve or otherwise unconcerned about this man, they shouldn’t be representing TIs either! Only infiltrators who work for the government perpetrators would allow this!
This is all more evidence that all of these people, who ALL claim to be ‘ex’-government agents, are purposely working against the TI community.
I suggest that readers read the entire second email exchange for themselves, since it provides further evidence of Robert Duncan’s psychotic nature, as well as showing why it should be DEMANDED that he produce proof of his credentials. You will see that he makes excuses not to do so and acts very strangely whenever he’s questioned about anything – exactly the way he’s consistently acted in emails to me (posted elsewhere on this blog as further evidence).
Robert Duncan should be charged with fraud and false impersonation at the very least, and kept at a far distance from any TIs. Those who insist that he’s trustable and choose to associate with him should also be regarded as potentially dangerous, since he might very well be using mind-control techniques on them and using them to lure in other unsuspecting TIs.
* * *
[1] “All World Day Emails - www.COINTELPRO Continues Today.org”
(Recently removed from internet, including Wayback Machine's archives.)
[2] “Re: Harvard - routine authentication check (no cause for alarm) - I sincerely hope that so-called Dr Robert Duncan won't turn out to be a fraud! - Google Groups”
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/harassment-victims/bwU6xxralKs
[3] “Mind Control Victims Europe – Yahoo Groups”
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MCVictimsEU/conversations/topics/1095
First
of all, I was reading a long and detailed blog post by Bob S.
regarding the manipulative tactics that were used to hinder the
success of Debra Dupre’s 2006 World Day conference. [1] Bob’s
post comprises a lengthy email exchange that took place in the week
just prior to that event. What are important to note within it are
the time frame (October, 2006) and the people who were involved in
that exchange or otherwise listed as recipients of the emails,
specifically: John Allman, Julianne McKinney, and Robert Duncan.
Further to note about this exchange is that these three people were
all working together at that time on a joint project that had to do
with preparations for the World Day conference, and there had been no
problems with any of them at that time regarding Robert Duncan’s
purported credentials. Although he wasn’t involved in this
particular exchange, he was listed in the email headers as a
recipient, so he was obviously a part of this project. (See the
references below for the full exchange.)
Next,
after having read this exchange, I began to read a forum thread on
Google Groups. [2] Again, what are important to note are the time
frame (July, 2007) and the people involved, who were again John
Allman, Julianne McKinney, and Robert Duncan. This forum thread took
place many months after the previous exchange (discussed above) that
was posted on Bob’s blog. Even more important to note here is the
discussion about Robert Duncan’s credentials, how Robert Duncan
responded to questions about it by John Allman, and how ‘ex’-NSA
agent and TI ‘advocate’ Julianne McKinney reacted. (Again, see
the references below for the full exchange.)
First
of all, John Allman had asked Robert Duncan a very appropriate
question that should have been very easy for him to answer, and
Allman John gave a very good reason for why he was asking:
Is
there a copy of your PhD thesis on the Harvard website, or an
abstract, or an entry in an list of those holding Harvard doctorates?
What subject was your doctorate in, and what was the title of your
thesis? Which year did Harvard award you your doctorate?
Please
do not be alarmed. This is a routine enquiry. Before repeating it,
I try to authenticate any information that might be useful to our
cause, and the support of our cause on the part of somebody with a
Harvard doctorate in a relevant academic discipline constitutes
information that might be useful to our cause. I'd like to be able
(because I have checked the information myself) to repeat the
information that you have a Harvard doctorate, and to amplify that
information on request, when mentioning you, for example when
recommending or commending you to others.
Here
is Robert Duncan’s typically bizarre response to John Allman
(pieced together from quotes):
From:
The Mind Hacking Strategy Group A consortium of scientists from
around the world
To:
John Allman
Sent:
Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:41 PM
Subject:
RE: Harvard - routine authentication check (no cause for alarm)
John,
Please
use your resources for something useful and don't violate people's
privacy.
I
will send you a naked photo if you wish instead of photocopies of
degrees.
By
the way, if you can be trusted with confidential information, that
letter below started an investigation that I have been asked to head
on behalf of TIs.
We
will see if you can be trusted not to tell others.
After
hundreds of emails to this organization, only mine did they agree to.
Be
careful how you spend your time.
Short,
concise emails.
Study
marketing from business and you will help our cause more.
Thanks.
Your friend,
The
Saint
The
next thing to note is the response to this from Julianne McKinney:
Julianne
McKinney
26/07/2007
Other
recipients: John_W...@hotmail.com, directe...@hotmail.com,
chicken...@comcast.net, dave...@aol.com, miav...@myway.com,
guid...@hotmail.com, kiri...@hotmail.com, jwls...@aol.com,
kathrin...@sonnenkinder.org, lrbr...@netscape.com,
luto...@hotmail.com, weiku...@gmail.com, angel...@yahoo.com,
xavqua...@hotmail.fr, ocw...@yahoo.com, John_W...@hotmail.com,
dbla...@yahoo.com, itzb...@hotmail.com, bas...@cox.net,
sel...@waitrose.com, feng...@yahoo.com, bethbuc...@yahoo.ca,
keri...@juno.com, lbu...@yahoo.com, bur...@verizon.net,
c.bu...@comcast.net, csch...@cox.net, danny...@telenet.be,
danu...@aol.com, deepur...@hotmail.com, arb...@verizon.net,
dun...@aol.com, joe_...@hotmail.co.uk, marem...@yahoo.com.mx,
erali...@aol.com, ahmad...@yahoo.ca, fawk...@cox.net,
jesusher...@hotmail.com, cgig...@hotmail.com, ivr...@freemail.gr,
jimmja...@hotmail.com, kleinmu...@web.de, infor...@kucinich.us,
nle...@juno.com, mbab...@iol.cz, olive...@yahoo.com,
demo...@peaceteam.net, cool_t...@hotmail.com, Somer...@aol.com,
as1...@juno.com, da...@davidswanson.org, medsp...@yahoo.com,
themi...@hotmail.com, samwil...@gmail.com, julianne...@yahoo.com,
moe_...@yahoo.ca, janet.c...@hotmail.co.uk,
croissant...@planet-interkom.de, gerrydu...@yahoo.com,
john...@yahoo.com, don.fr...@yahoo.com, te...@mindspring.com,
wlot...@web.de, mel...@hellandfamily.com, monika...@gmail.com,
derrickc...@gmail.com, ad...@stolet.com, LAS...@comcast.net,
ata...@comcast.net, ele...@shoestringradio.net, harlan...@yahoo.com
That
is truly a bizarre response from the alleged "Dr. Duncan."
And that's not just counting the errors in spelling and syntax.
"Dr.
Duncan," as far as I am concerned, is a fraud and a
not-too-effective con artist.
No
true Ph.D. would refused to furnish appropriate details regarding the
degree awarded -- simple facts, such as, the title and date of his
doctoral thesis, the date on which the degree was awarded, and the
name of the college and faculty awarding the degree. Offering to
send a "naked photo," instead, is simply an attempt at
blowing smoke.
Tell
you what, "Robert," since you've made this offer more than
once, how about sending us the said photo. It will keep us amused,
no doubt.
Julianne
This
email from McKinney (which btw, along with John Allman’s post, made
some excellent points about providing credentials) was followed by
this telling response from another person named Ted Jackson, who was
also involved in the project with these people the year before
(emphasis added):
Ted
Jackson
26/07/2007
Other
recipients: julianne...@yahoo.com, directe...@hotmail.com,
chicken...@comcast.net, dave...@aol.com, John_W...@hotmail.com,
miav...@myway.com, guid...@hotmail.com, kiri...@hotmail.com,
jwls...@aol.com, kathrin...@sonnenkinder.org, lrbr...@netscape.com,
luto...@hotmail.com, weiku...@gmail.com, angel...@yahoo.com,
xavqua...@hotmail.fr, ocw...@yahoo.com, dbla...@yahoo.com,
itzb...@hotmail.com, bas...@cox.net, sel...@waitrose.com,
feng...@yahoo.com, bethbuc...@yahoo.ca, keri...@juno.com,
lbu...@yahoo.com, bur...@verizon.net, c.bu...@comcast.net,
csch...@cox.net, danny...@telenet.be, danu...@aol.com,
deepur...@hotmail.com, arb...@verizon.net, dun...@aol.com,
joe_...@hotmail.co.uk, marem...@yahoo.com.mx, erali...@aol.com,
ahmad...@yahoo.ca, fawk...@cox.net, jesusher...@hotmail.com,
cgig...@hotmail.com, ivr...@freemail.gr, jimmja...@hotmail.com,
kleinmu...@web.de, infor...@kucinich.us, nle...@juno.com,
mbab...@iol.cz, olive...@yahoo.com, demo...@peaceteam.net,
cool_t...@hotmail.com, Somer...@aol.com, as1...@juno.com,
da...@davidswanson.org, medsp...@yahoo.com, themi...@hotmail.com,
samwil...@gmail.com, julianne...@yahoo.com, moe_...@yahoo.ca,
janet.c...@hotmail.co.uk, croissant...@planet-interkom.de,
gerrydu...@yahoo.com, john...@yahoo.com, don.fr...@yahoo.com,
te...@mindspring.com, wlot...@web.de, mel...@hellandfamily.com,
monika...@gmail.com, derrickc...@gmail.com, ad...@stolet.com,
LAS...@comcast.net, ata...@comcast.net, ele...@shoestringradio.net,
harlan...@yahoo.com
Julianne,
From
among your long, long list of recipients, I ccan't find Robert's
address. So, what is the point of addressing a question to him that
he won't receive?
As
far as the 'naked' remark, did John include Robert's entire reply?
Or just bits and pieces that seemed to support his contention?
Perhaps it was just a flippant remark (like many of your own,
Julianne) meant to convey 'I have nothing to hide'.
John,
why don't you go ahead and post Robert's unedited reply from which
the bits and pieces were taken?
Ted
And
then another message from Julianne McKinney a little further on
(emphasis added):
At
01:16 PM 7/26/2007, you wrote:
Ted,
Duncan's
email address is directe...@hotmail.com . On some occasions, he
places his own name in front of it; on some occasions, he identifies
himself as "Dr. Robert Duncan," still using the same email
address; and on others, he identifies himself as a "consortium
of scientists from around the world," again using the same email
address. In the above list, he does not identify himself as being
the holder of this email address.
Duncan
made an identical offer to send a naked photo of himself in an email
to Aaron and Derrick, when the issue of his alleged Ph.D. was
separately surfaced. This
is why I said that he'd offered to send a naked photo of himself
"more than once."
I
trust that you find John's response to your other questions adequate.
Julianne
The
first of her messages suggests that Julianne McKinney had attempted
to pretend that she was on John Allman’s side by also questioning
Robert Duncan’s credentials. The fact that she excluded Robert
Duncan’s email address in the header indicates that she didn’t
intend him to get this email, and that it was intended for John
Allman’s viewing, and probably certain others as well.
What
makes this all so suspicious is that it’s quite provable with
simple google searches that Robert Duncan, Julianne McKinney, Derrick
Robinson, and various others have had a close working relationship
for quite some time, extending from before the 2006 World Day
conference right up to the present. So why would she be pretending to
question his credentials in 2007? Why are she and Derrick Robinson
and others still working with him now? I’ve already been able to
confirm by way of a search through Harvard’s registry that Robert
Duncan never went to Harvard as he still continues to claim, so it
can’t be that any of them were able to later confirm that he did.
It
appears that this was a deception on McKinney’s part… doing
damage control… making herself look like she’s on John Allman’s
side while attempting to keep this from Robert Duncan. Maybe she can
explain it some other way… I don’t know. This is exactly the sort
of deceptive tactic that government-trained perps will use to retain
the confidence of the people they hope to keep stringing along for
various reasons. The infighting that they often display among
themselves is another deceptive tactic that I’ve come across
before, which is used to confuse and distract people or to derail
situations. They’re willing to trash each other one moment, and
then act like very close partners the next. This display by McKinney
over Robert Duncan’s credentials is either a deception, or these
people associated with FFCHS are incredibly stupid. I’ll assume the
former, but it doesn’t really matter which it is. These people are
dangerous to TIs because of their lack of concern about possible
government infiltrators (like Derrick Robinson and Julianne McKinney)
or complete wackjobs (like Robert Duncan) getting involved in the
issues that concern TIs.
After
having read those two email exchanges, I came across yet another
email exchange that involved John Allman, Julianne McKinney, and
Robert Duncan from November, 2007. [3] This one really caught my
attention, because it included this very clear confession by Robert
Duncan in one of his more honest and semi-lucid moments:
"R.
Duncan" <duncan@higherorder. com> wrote:
Dear
John A. and others whose full time jobs are accusing,
I
have been trying to confess for a long time. I am a perp. I am paid
by the US government to conduct psychological experiments on you. I
am deceitful sometimes and I am wrong sometimes. I even accidentally
tell you a truth now and then. But they dock my pay when that
happens.
So,
now that you have a full confession. Can we move on and have
constructive conversations even knowing that I am trying to hurt you
through intentional bad information and theories? Greed is what
drives me. I get extra-CIA pay when I can lead you towards irrational
and unfounded belief systems. Perhaps it is good mental exercise to
be able to critically reason while knowing that a sophisticated perp
like myself is guiding you away from God and truth intentionally?
Perhaps
like with evolution theory, we should separate church and state. Use
one as a personal guidance and an information drug to inspire you,
and the other that has proven more useful in predicting the immediate
future and to explain the physical world where brain chemistry and
the mind intersect. Always be skeptical of information that you read.
This should not be something new. However, personally attacking
someone shows a lack of ability to understand the science and argue
on that basis. We are back to the Christian inquisitions and will get
nowhere. Just assume in every email that you are required to think
for yourself and not be lazy wanting to rely on someone’s
reputation. In fact, in a perfect intelligent meritocracy, where no
names were attached to information exchanges, you would have to learn
to do this.
Why
does thinking and arguing in a professional exchange about this topic
in a scientific and strategic manner, pain you so much? Why do you
spend so much time talking about the useless and nonsensical aspects?
Get over your classicism and take everyone as if they have something
important to say. Filter, don’t respond negatively. I for one have
nearly fully given up my defense research and public speaking because
of the constant barrage of negativity. I found that I can help more
people and other groups with other problems who are more grateful of
my sacrifices. You aren’t winning allies or friends and you haven’t
figured it out that negativity is highly infectious and the most
obvious quality to instill into people and groups to isolate and
disassemble them. If you haven’t figured out just the very basic
psychological strategies being used against a group assembling by
reading military and CIA methods, you haven’t progressed in this
chess game at all. This is why I have lost hope.
I could say a lot about some of the hypocritical things he says here as they pertain to his own actions, but that would distract from what I’m attempting to point out. The important thing is that he admitted to these people that still work with him even now that he’s a perp who is set on deceiving people. Nothing further needs to be said about this here, since it couldn’t be stated more clearly, right out of the horse’s (or asses) mouth.
This time, however, Julianne McKinney’s response is completely different than before, even suspicious in her easy acceptance of Robert Duncan’s bizarre confession:
From:
Julianne McKinney
To:
duncan@higherorder. com ; 'M. Hosny' ; 'John Allman'
Cc:
'Julianne McKinney' ; 'Monika Stoces' ; robalandes@telus. net ; 'Thea
Vangossum' ; soleilmavis@ yahoo.com ; rudyrud2004@ yayoo.fr ; 'MAES
Nelly' ; johnfinch@excite. com ; info@freedomfchs. com ;
info@advocaat- dumoulin. be ; julgilliam1@ riversongs. tv ; 'Harlan
Girard' ; 'Annemarie Gielen' ; 'Adams Elisabeth' ;
eleanor@shoestringr adio.net ; dcr618@... ; 'Petrit Demo' ; 'CCHR' ;
CarolineLucas@ GreenMEPs. org.uk ; ACLA@americancognit
ivelibertiesasso c.org ; 'jean verstraeten' ; patsy.sorensen@
payoke.be ; MCVictimsEU@ yahoogroups. com ; 'GUELCHER Ernst' ;
peterpm@xs4all. nl ; mcactivism@yahoogro ups.com ; 'Pam Farnsworth' ;
'Anna Bisetti' ; 'John McMurtrey'
Sent:
Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:23 AM
Subject:
RE: "You are weakening our noble movement by these negative
tendencies!"
Confession
is good for the soul, I've heard. Don't think of it as falling on
your sword, however. Think of it as castling your king.
Meanwhile,
...do you think I might possibly be removed from this mailing list?
Julianne
At the very least, all of this should make you question why any of these people continue to work with Robert Duncan at all and why they are not more careful about who they work with, given their knowledge of COINTELPRO tactics. Robert Duncan proves himself time and again to be completely off his rocker, even sociopathic, and is therefore NOT suited to represent or help TIs in any manner whatsoever! And if these other people are so naïve or otherwise unconcerned about this man, they shouldn’t be representing TIs either! Only infiltrators who work for the government perpetrators would allow this!
This is all more evidence that all of these people, who ALL claim to be ‘ex’-government agents, are purposely working against the TI community.
I suggest that readers read the entire second email exchange for themselves, since it provides further evidence of Robert Duncan’s psychotic nature, as well as showing why it should be DEMANDED that he produce proof of his credentials. You will see that he makes excuses not to do so and acts very strangely whenever he’s questioned about anything – exactly the way he’s consistently acted in emails to me (posted elsewhere on this blog as further evidence).
Robert Duncan should be charged with fraud and false impersonation at the very least, and kept at a far distance from any TIs. Those who insist that he’s trustable and choose to associate with him should also be regarded as potentially dangerous, since he might very well be using mind-control techniques on them and using them to lure in other unsuspecting TIs.
* * *
[1] “All World Day Emails - www.COINTELPRO Continues Today.org”
(Recently removed from internet, including Wayback Machine's archives.)
[2] “Re: Harvard - routine authentication check (no cause for alarm) - I sincerely hope that so-called Dr Robert Duncan won't turn out to be a fraud! - Google Groups”
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/harassment-victims/bwU6xxralKs
[3] “Mind Control Victims Europe – Yahoo Groups”
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MCVictimsEU/conversations/topics/1095
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
About Facebook
Facebook is fascist. "Fascist Book" would be a much more appropriate name for it.
I have ALWAYS used my real name online. My real name is Anthony Forwood. You will not find me using any other name anywhere on the internet. Unlike those people whose intentions are questionable, I have nothing to hide that requires that I use a fake identity. As a real targeted individual, I want what I post online to be associated with the real me and not some anonymous person, so that should I ever have to refer to it in my defense, I have a base of evidence to show that I am the person reflected in my words. What others might say about me behind my back or accuse me of without providing any evidence is inconsequential to me... something I can't be expected to control. Only my written words with my name attached, posted here on my blog, can serve to speak for my character, and nothing else.
A few years ago, I had a conflict with a person on facebook who was using the pseudonym 'OSI Informers', and who was (and still is) promoting a fake lawsuit and trying to get TIs to pay him money to join in on it. I soon discovered that this person's real name was Greg Gamache, although he continually denied it when confronted about it and even threatened me with a lawsuit for somehow having slandered him by pointing out his fraudulent scheme. As soon as I started warning people about him, he reported to facebook that I was using a fake name. My account was immediately blocked and facebook expected me to identify a series of randomly selected photos that had been posted by people on my extensive 'friends list' and tell them who posted them before I could access my account again. As would be expected, I couldn't identify any of them, since they were all obscure photos, none of which could have been expected to be familiar to me unless I had studied and memorized everything that the people on my 'friends list' had posted up until then. I ended up abandoning that facebook account and creating a new one... using my real name again.
I was able to keep this second account until a few weeks ago, when I posted PROOF that Greg Gamache, 'OSI Informers', and 'Will Litigate' were all the same person. This proof consisted of screen shots of facebook posts where he was using each these various accounts and admitting that he was the same person as the other accounts (see my previous post). Soon after having done this, I found that my account was blocked once again, with the same ridiculous expectation of me to identify a series of randomly chosen photos that were purportedly posted by people on my 'friends list'. I abandoned the account, and facebook as well. Who needs this shit?
I had tried to inform facebook that the person who was continually reporting my account as fake was himself using various fake accounts, and was attempting to use facebook to scam people out of money, but they apparently didn't care about any of this even though they obviously believed his lie about me, since he's continued to freely use all of his fake accounts since then and still does. I have also reported threats and abusive comments he has made to me on facebook, with nothing at all being done about them. Obviously, facebook supports his lawsuit scam, and by providing him with a platform to promote it, they are criminal accomplices by aiding and abetting him.
I should also point out at this point that facebook has been an accomplice in other scams in the past as well, by providing a platform for the fake victims of Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing hoax to accumulate millions of dollars in donations from a deceived public.
I can only conclude that facebook is involved in targeting people by giving excessive leeway to people like Greg Gamache/Will Litigate/OSI Informers, who engage in these activities while hiding behind a multitude of fake names. Facebook is actually designed to make targeting of individuals far easier than it is on any other internet forums, allowing for cyber-stalking by providing the 'follow' feature, allowing for isolation of targets without their realization by using 'sock puppet' accounts to surround them, as well as by allowing users to surreptitiously change public groups to secret (hidden) groups where a person can then be abused or otherwise manipulated without anyone else seeing. Most significantly, facebook makes it very easy to compile personal information on people that can then be used by people like Greg Gamache/Will Litigate/OSI Informers to target selected individuals. I suspect that facebook also provides profiling capabilities to the fascist US government, and may even provide that information to people like Greg Gamache/OSI Informers/Will Litigate, who they appear to favor and give special privileges to.
Facebook doesn't really care about people who use fake names, although they pretend to. They only care about making targeting easy and allowing perpetrators like Greg Gamache/Will Litigate/OSI Informers to have free reign in conducting criminal activities and targeting of others on their site.
It's already known that facebook works hand-in-hand with the fascist intelligence organs of the US government who have a desire to identify and incapacitate freedom-lovers and free-thinkers like myself in typical COINTELPRO fashion. Facebook is the world's largest internet forum with millions of daily users. That it would block my account and not allow me any realistic way of proving that I am who I claim to be while people with OBVIOUS fake names are allowed to continue to operate so freely on their site and engage in criminal activities that are geared towards scamming innocent people out of their money or otherwise harassing and abusing them can only mean one thing... that FACEBOOK IS FASCIST and prefers those users who resort to underhanded tactics to get away with their con jobs and cover up their crimes.
It's already known that facebook works hand-in-hand with the fascist intelligence organs of the US government who have a desire to identify and incapacitate freedom-lovers and free-thinkers like myself in typical COINTELPRO fashion. Facebook is the world's largest internet forum with millions of daily users. That it would block my account and not allow me any realistic way of proving that I am who I claim to be while people with OBVIOUS fake names are allowed to continue to operate so freely on their site and engage in criminal activities that are geared towards scamming innocent people out of their money or otherwise harassing and abusing them can only mean one thing... that FACEBOOK IS FASCIST and prefers those users who resort to underhanded tactics to get away with their con jobs and cover up their crimes.
I could just as easily create a new facebook account and continue on as before, still using my real name, but because of Greg Gamache's actions and the failure of facebook to deal with it appropriately, I've decided to take this all to a new level and do some things I wouldn't normally do.
I'm coming for you Greg Gamache. You created a criminal scam to draw in suckers and take their money, but you'll find yourself caught up in your own deceit soon enough.
Saturday, September 20, 2014
Friday, September 19, 2014
Robert Duncan Confesses: “I am a perp.”
I just
found this published email from Robert Duncan (the original posting
can be found at the link below):
* * *
"R.
Duncan" <duncan@higherorder. com> wrote:
Dear
John A. and others whose full time jobs are accusing,
I
have been trying to confess for a long time. I am a perp. I am paid
by the US government to conduct psychological experiments on you. I
am deceitful sometimes and I am wrong sometimes. I even accidentally
tell you a truth now and then. But they dock my pay when that
happens.
So,
now that you have a full confession. Can we move on and have
constructive conversations even knowing that I am trying to hurt you
through intentional bad information and theories? Greed is what
drives me. I get extra-CIA pay when I can lead you towards irrational
and unfounded belief systems. Perhaps it is good mental exercise to
be able to critically reason while knowing that a sophisticated perp
like myself is guiding you away from God and truth intentionally?
Perhaps
like with evolution theory, we should separate church and state. Use
one as a personal guidance and an information drug to inspire you,
and the other that has proven more useful in predicting the immediate
future and to explain the physical world where brain chemistry and
the mind intersect. Always be skeptical of information that you read.
This should not be something new. However, personally attacking
someone shows a lack of ability to understand the science and argue
on that basis. We are back to the Christian inquisitions and will get
nowhere. Just assume in every email that you are required to think
for yourself and not be lazy wanting to rely on someone’s
reputation. In fact, in a perfect intelligent meritocracy, where no
names were attached to information exchanges, you would have to learn
to do this.
Why does thinking and arguing in a professional exchange about this topic in a scientific and strategic manner, pain you so much? Why do you spend so much time talking about the useless and nonsensical aspects? Get over your classicism and take everyone as if they have something important to say. Filter, don’t respond negatively. I for one have nearly fully given up my defense research and public speaking because of the constant barrage of negativity. I found that I can help more people and other groups with other problems who are more grateful of my sacrifices. You aren’t winning allies or friends and you haven’t figured it out that negativity is highly infectious and the most obvious quality to instill into people and groups to isolate and disassemble them. If you haven’t figured out just the very basic psychological strategies being used against a group assembling by reading military and CIA methods, you haven’t progressed in this chess game at all. This is why I have lost hope.
* * *
Reference:
“Mind
Control Victims Europe – Yahoo Groups”
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MCVictimsEU/conversations/topics/1095
Monday, September 15, 2014
A Response to Ken Wilbourne Jr.’s Empty Accusation
I
received this comment from FFCHS’s Ken Wilbourne Jr. in response to
this blog post:
http://anthonyforwood.blogspot.ca/2014/09/facebook-harassment-teams.html
Date:
Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:39:31 +0000
Subject:
[Miscellaneous Notes by Anthony Forwood] New comment on Facebook
Harassment Teams.
From:
Anonymous noreply-comment@blogger.com
To:
forwood@live.ca
Anthony
Forwood or whoever you are, thank you for this post of yours, though
I'd wish you never did this. It will only served to discredit you. I
have NEVER been associated with OSI in any way, nor do I associate
with their members. And, FFCHS does NOT have a racket of targeted
individuals bantering around to cause intentional problems. I banned
you years ago from a TI online social media support group due to your
disinformation about active denial technology and methods that is
used to harass and harm innocent citizens. It is my guess you are a
government paid infiltrator/agent. The lies you have posted here are
ridiculous and trustworthy for an example of what a true perpetrator
is. I hope someone sues your eyeballs out. - Ken Wilbourne
Ken,
you claim that I’m a government-paid infiltrator/agent… based on
what evidence exactly? Because I point out damaging things about you
and your cohorts and what you’re all doing to harass and discredit
real TIs? I’ve tried to discuss these issues with you, Derrick
Robinson, Robert Duncan, and others, with the same avoidance tactics
used against me each time. As it is, this sort of accusation you make
here is a typical perp tactic when it comes with absolutely nothing
to back it up. They’re empty words, Ken... nothing more. Why don’t
you be kind enough to point out exactly what grounds you base this
accusation on? Otherwise, I really have no need to defend myself, and
your post only serves to show others how you and your ‘ex’-government
associates at FFCHS operate. However, if you can point out something
SPECIFIC that I’ve posted on my blog or elsewhere that’s at
fault, I’d be willing to change it to better reflect the truth. I
tried to discuss some issues with you once before, but you chose
instead to immediately kick me out of your facebook group, as you’ve
admitted here. You avoided answering for yourself and for FFCHS about
the things you continue to promote as true without ever providing any
evidence beyond your say-so, and you decided instead to close out the
person who questioned it and sought that evidence. That says a lot
about you…
As it
is, Ken, YOU specifically are involved in organized targeting against
selected TIs on facebook, including Dee Dorsty, which I have evidence
of posted below. Seeing that this targeting also involves Dee Hardin,
another long-time FFCHS member, and Will Litigate (aka OSI Informers,
aka Greg Gamache), who you claim to not be associated with, it just
further proves that FFCHS and the OSI gang are working together, and
that you’re a liar. Apparently, this is the usual MO for all of
you, to gang up on someone and smear them… but never with any
evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of the person you attack.
Compare that to what I provide on my blog regarding the questionable
activities of FFCHS. My evidence comes from your organization’s own
publications, from the quoted statements in the media of its board
members, and from many first-hand experiences with you and your
associates. Why don’t you answer to that? Calling me an
infiltrator/agent without any evidence whatsoever is merely a weak
tactical response to the strong evidence I’ve been compiling that
only fools would ever fall for. As it appears more and more, you’re
mixed up with the real infiltrator/agents, particularly Derrick
Robinson, who’s even admitted to being in the NSA, which no one
really ever gets out of once they sign up.
So
Ken, instead of just generalizing with your accusations, tell me what
you specifically find fault with and why and I’ll address it, and
we can go from there. Don’t just try to label me without backing
yourself up with something. That’s an extremely transparent perp
tactic that anyone with ANY intelligence can see through. And don’t
premeditate what you think my response will be in order to excuse
yourself from doing so, either. That’s a cop out that your good
friend the ‘Harvard grad’ Robert Duncan chose to take, which only
resulted in drawing my attention to all of you at FFCHS once again
and digging up more dirt.
If you feel that there’s a lawsuit here, please feel free to send me a subpoena. I would love to get you people into a court of law where you’ll be made to explain yourselves:
Anthony Forwood
#52-936 Granville St.
Vancouver, BC
V6Z-1L2
Friday, September 5, 2014
Who is Timothy White?
Timothy
White’s name first came to my attention a few months ago when I was
researching Derrick Robinson’s alleged contact with Aaron Alexis
(the Washington Navy Yard shooter) just before he went on his rampage
last year. I had discovered that White was on the FFCHS board of
directors, and that he had made some interesting statements that
intimately tied him into the Aaron Alexis Affair, but that’s all I
knew for certain about him at that time.
Nevertheless,
while I had been looking for information on him, I came across a
‘Tim’ White who was involved in some issues with a woman named
Barbara Hartwell. The whole thing appeared to be a tangled mess of
back and forth accusations and counter-accusations and it was hard to
determine what it was all about and who was being honest, if anybody,
so I didn’t dig too far into it and didn’t find out if this was
the same Timothy White.
But
more recently, while looking further for information on White, I came
across a totally unrelated post by someone named Leslie Oliver, dated
Aug. 22, 2005, titled
‘A Personal Account / EM
Scalar Weapons : AZ IMC’, in which this person stated (emphasis
added):
'Men
in black' (American shadow government) are after me here in
Kathmandu, Nepal because I have posted this information a few times
with more on Scalar weapons but I want everyone to know... who is
responsible if anything "happens". Tim
White, Ted Gunderson and Julianne McKinney have
recently been emailing me. I have also left this information with
well-known 9/11 attorney and activist, Phil Berg.
[…]
Also
while here in Kathmandu, Tim White, a friend of ex-FBI man, Ted
Gunderson has contacted me from an APFN from a post I made. A woman
(I assume she is) by the name of Julianne McKinney contacted me from
Tim's CC: list...apparently "ex-military" who is
pretentious, arrogant.
This
was enough to satisfy me that these are all the same Tim White, since
I know from the description that this is definitely the same Julianne
McKinney who I’ve written about elsewhere and who has always been
closely affiliated with FFCHS, so this Tim White who was associating
himself with Ted Gunderson is undoubtedly the same Tim White who’s
now a part of FFCHS’s inner sanctum.
Knowing
now that these are the same person, it becomes much more apparent as
I look at all the posts that come up in a google search of this guy
that he’s a hired disruption agent. Going back at least as far as
2001, there’s nothing but bad shit being said about him. He’s
apparently gained himself quite a reputation for harassing people,
and the information that others have dug up on him paint him – to
put it mildly – as a transvestite snitch for the Denver FBI who
peddles in hardcore pornography.
Apparently,
White was targeting Barbara Hartwell and others back in 2001 for
publishing damaging information about Ted Gunderson, information that
paints Gunderson in a light that is actually more believable than
that of the altruistic Patriot he wants everyone to think of him as –
that he has spent his retirement years since 1979 containing public
exposure of the people running the satanic
mind-control/sex-slave/drug-running/arms-dealing network that
involves people at the highest levels of wealth and power in the USA
and abroad.
This
is all very noteworthy, because it connects what I already believe is
FFCHS’s real agenda with what Ted Gunderson has been accused of
doing and for which White was apparently doing damage control –
making sure that any mind-control victims who might know or remember
anything that could expose their government perpetrators were
identified and brought under control before they could do any real
damage, as well as to use them in their own operations. The fact is
(and this is not news to me), we’ve all been duped for years about
certain major players in this wide-ranging government psyop, letting
these people gain our trust with their supposed inside knowledge and
their claims of being on our side and wanting to expose the
mind-control, Satanism, pedophilia, etc., when really they’re
working to keep it all going. As I’ll keep saying, the people at
FFCHS are all government agents and their dupes and they’re there
for this reason only, and no other.
I’d
like to point out here that for all of Gunderson’s years of
investigation, with all of the boxes of documents he claimed to have
about this criminal network and the people involved, we have actually
received next to nothing from him, even on his deathbed when he had a
truly once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make some major revelations.
All that Gunderson has ever done in all that time was to place
himself within investigations in order to manage and control the
people who could expose this network and its activities, making sure
that what little tidbits they revealed would never be enough to go
anywhere. He has rerouted these people into taking part in lecture
circuits and conferences that only serve to entertain the targeted
community with an endless stream of the same old information again
and again. This has been going on for the three decades that
Gunderson was operating in this capacity, so he succeeded in his real
duties as a government double agent. Cathy O’Brien’s story, which
came out way back around 1988, has never really resulted in anything
other than being a discussion piece for people to muse over. The same
goes for Brice Taylor. The evidence suggests that Gunderson, using
people like Tim White, pulled a psyop on people like Barbara Hartwell
and Stew Webb in order to disrupt their attempts to expose him.
Now Tim White is on the board of directors of FFCHS. His previous handler Ted Gunderson is dead, but Gunderson’s part in keeping this cover-up under wraps has undoubtedly been passed on to others. FFCHS has been in a very good position since his death to take that part over. And by all appearances, this is what they are doing.
To use Gunderson’s own words:
“Anyone
who is not discerning enough to recognize the tactics of the enemy
and who does not realize what is happening behind the scenes is
uninformed and a victim to his own ignorance.”
Saturday, August 30, 2014
FFCHS and the Death of Susan Watkins
by Anthony Forwood
I was recently informed that a member of FFCHS named Susan Watkins had committed suicide several months ago, which I mentioned in my last blog. I decided to look at this case more closely. Here’s what I found…
- On March 13, 2014, a woman named Susan Watkins passed away in Kansas City, Missouri. Her online obituary follows:
- Five days later, on April 5, 2014, Derrick Robinson published the following announcement about this death in his FFCHS newsletter (emphasis added):
A number of red lights immediately go off when I read Derrick Robinson’s announcement.
1) He is announcing details of this alleged death without providing any sources for his information. My own search for details was only able to come up with the obituary notice above, in which there is no mention of the cause of death, nor any indications that it was a suicide and that a note had been left behind.
2) He words the announcement to say that “many others” had already heard about this alleged suicide. Who are these many others, and how did they find out about this death? Why is there no mention of her death anywhere online, except for a few duplicates of Robinson’s announcement posted on blogs?
3) Derrick Robinson also states that “many are not convinced” that this was a suicide. Who are these ‘many’, and what are their grounds for doubting that this was a suicide? This statement appears to be intended to put weight behind Derrick Robinson’s own suggestion that this wasn’t just a suicide, based on the claim that the alleged note was written in the past tense.
4) Where did information about the alleged note (or writing on the wall) come from? Where did the information that this was a suicide come from? I could find no source for these pieces of information anywhere, other than Derrick Robinson himself. This incident smells a lot like the claims Derrick Robinson and company made about Aaron Alexis contacting them prior to the Washington Navy Yard shooting, which appears to have been concocted for no other reason than to promote himself and FFCHS in the media while instilling fear among his followers.
5) Derrick Robinson claims that Watkins contacted him and a few others at FFCHS just prior to her death, leaving them with “contact information for her sister”, which he determined meant that she felt that she was in danger. Why didn’t he immediately react to this and attempt to help her or find out more? He makes no indication that he did anything at all. This is similar to his past inaction with regard to Aaron Alexis.
6) Without providing any evidence whatsoever to support himself, and apparently without even checking into the matter further, Derrick Robinson comes to the conclusion that “it is obviously murder by the perpetrators”. Again, he is using this tragedy to instill unwarranted fears in his followers. But Robinson presents this suggestion in a way that separates himself from the responsibility of actually making it himself by stating that ‘someone else’ pointed it out. So who is this other person? Why state it at all unless he wanted the psychological effect it would have on his fear-driven followers?
7) Perhaps he answers the last question I just raised in his closing sentence, that “what we are experiencing is nothing short of a secret holocaust”. He is using this (possibly contrived) incident to exaggerate many people’s fears by suggesting that TIs are being knocked off willy-nilly, and that they might be next.
The fact is, there is NO evidence that Susan Watkins committed suicide or was murdered. There is NO evidence that there was a suicide note. There is NO evidence that this death was related to targeting. There is NO evidence that Derrick Robinson or anyone else at FFCHS received anything from Susan Watkins just prior to her death. Hell, I haven’t even seen any evidence that the Susan Watkins named in the obituary above had anything to do with Derrick Robinson or FFCHS at all!
But fear-driven fools will follow tricksters blindly, and so you can bet that many gullible people who have been led by the likes of Derrick Robinson to think that they’re being targeted – whether they are or not – will take this announcement as fact and allow it to affect their perceptions further. They will take Derrick Robinson’s unfounded suggestions as fact and go from there, never doubting his skill in leading them wherever they think they’re going but never seeming to ever get anywhere…
I was recently informed that a member of FFCHS named Susan Watkins had committed suicide several months ago, which I mentioned in my last blog. I decided to look at this case more closely. Here’s what I found…
- On March 13, 2014, a woman named Susan Watkins passed away in Kansas City, Missouri. Her online obituary follows:
Susan
Valerie Watkins, 56, passed away March 31, 2014, in Kansas City,
Missouri. She was born in Springfield, Missouri on February 7, 1958
to James F. Watkins, Sr. and Martha M. Watkins. She was a twin with
her brother, Kevin. She graduated from Shawnee Mission Northwest High
School in 1976. She achieved several certifications as a legal
secretary, working for firms in the Kansas City and Los Angeles
areas. She enjoyed Kansas City jazz, swimming, arts, and museums. She
had a true love of animals and frequently assisted in animal rescue
efforts. Susan was creative and authored a book "Winston".
She is survived by her siblings, Beth Carlson, and husband Bob, of
Colorado Springs, Colorado, James (Jim) Watkins, Jr. and wife Deborah
(Debi) of Leawood, Kansas, Richard (Rick) Watkins and Joyce Generali
of Kansas City, Missouri, Kevin Watkins of Overland Park, Kansas,
eleven loving nieces and nephews, and fourteen grand nieces, and
grand nephews. A memorial service will be held at 2:00 p.m. Friday,
April 18 at Kansas City First Church of the Nazarene, 11811 State
Line Road. Memorial contributions may be made to a charity of your
choice.
- Five days later, on April 5, 2014, Derrick Robinson published the following announcement about this death in his FFCHS newsletter (emphasis added):
Monday,
March 31, 2014: Death
by Hanging of
Susan Watkins
As
many
of you have heard by now,
we experienced a grisly loss this past week of one of our most
important members, Susan Watkins, a very professional and
knowledgeable volunteer with our Legal Committee, who was found
hanged in her house on
Monday, March 31, 2014 by her landlord.
Although
it is being
labelled a suicide due
to the writing
left on her wall which
said: "They watched me by satellite while I killed myself,"
many
are not convinced that
that's what occurred. Personally, I find it odd for someone to speak
of killing themselves in the past tense.
Several
days before this event, Susan sent an email to some of us with
contact
information for her sister,
the executor of her will, her landlord, and Dr. Staninger - "as
the Government harassment/torture increases from time to time."
Therefore, it seems either she felt really threatened or was planning
this herself. Either way, as someone
pointed out,
it
is obviously murder by the perpetrators.
It's
incidents like this that underscore that what we are experiencing is
nothing short of a secret holocaust.
A number of red lights immediately go off when I read Derrick Robinson’s announcement.
1) He is announcing details of this alleged death without providing any sources for his information. My own search for details was only able to come up with the obituary notice above, in which there is no mention of the cause of death, nor any indications that it was a suicide and that a note had been left behind.
2) He words the announcement to say that “many others” had already heard about this alleged suicide. Who are these many others, and how did they find out about this death? Why is there no mention of her death anywhere online, except for a few duplicates of Robinson’s announcement posted on blogs?
3) Derrick Robinson also states that “many are not convinced” that this was a suicide. Who are these ‘many’, and what are their grounds for doubting that this was a suicide? This statement appears to be intended to put weight behind Derrick Robinson’s own suggestion that this wasn’t just a suicide, based on the claim that the alleged note was written in the past tense.
4) Where did information about the alleged note (or writing on the wall) come from? Where did the information that this was a suicide come from? I could find no source for these pieces of information anywhere, other than Derrick Robinson himself. This incident smells a lot like the claims Derrick Robinson and company made about Aaron Alexis contacting them prior to the Washington Navy Yard shooting, which appears to have been concocted for no other reason than to promote himself and FFCHS in the media while instilling fear among his followers.
5) Derrick Robinson claims that Watkins contacted him and a few others at FFCHS just prior to her death, leaving them with “contact information for her sister”, which he determined meant that she felt that she was in danger. Why didn’t he immediately react to this and attempt to help her or find out more? He makes no indication that he did anything at all. This is similar to his past inaction with regard to Aaron Alexis.
6) Without providing any evidence whatsoever to support himself, and apparently without even checking into the matter further, Derrick Robinson comes to the conclusion that “it is obviously murder by the perpetrators”. Again, he is using this tragedy to instill unwarranted fears in his followers. But Robinson presents this suggestion in a way that separates himself from the responsibility of actually making it himself by stating that ‘someone else’ pointed it out. So who is this other person? Why state it at all unless he wanted the psychological effect it would have on his fear-driven followers?
7) Perhaps he answers the last question I just raised in his closing sentence, that “what we are experiencing is nothing short of a secret holocaust”. He is using this (possibly contrived) incident to exaggerate many people’s fears by suggesting that TIs are being knocked off willy-nilly, and that they might be next.
The fact is, there is NO evidence that Susan Watkins committed suicide or was murdered. There is NO evidence that there was a suicide note. There is NO evidence that this death was related to targeting. There is NO evidence that Derrick Robinson or anyone else at FFCHS received anything from Susan Watkins just prior to her death. Hell, I haven’t even seen any evidence that the Susan Watkins named in the obituary above had anything to do with Derrick Robinson or FFCHS at all!
But fear-driven fools will follow tricksters blindly, and so you can bet that many gullible people who have been led by the likes of Derrick Robinson to think that they’re being targeted – whether they are or not – will take this announcement as fact and allow it to affect their perceptions further. They will take Derrick Robinson’s unfounded suggestions as fact and go from there, never doubting his skill in leading them wherever they think they’re going but never seeming to ever get anywhere…
Monday, August 25, 2014
FFCHS Suicide Cult – An Unprecedented Numbers of Suicides
Why would anyone want to get involved with an organization that does nothing to help people, but has an unprecedented record of producing suicides? The regularity of FFCHS-related suicides is increasing…
1) In 2004, a year before Derrick Robinson even formed Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS), he took control of a TI group on Yahoo that had previously been run by a woman named Sylvia. Sylvia mysteriously disappeared from the group after about two months, never to be heard of again. It was alleged that her disappearance was due to targeting. Was it really? Targeted by whom?
2) In
July of 2009, a man named John Turner in Florida allegedly (according
to FFCHS) reported that covert attacks on him became more severe
after speaking with FFCHS board member Timothy White and a man named
Howard Thompson. Soon after this, he bought a gun and killed his
girlfriend and a neighbor before killing himself. He had allegedly
(according to FFCHS) been involved with FFCHS for about a year.
3) On
September 8, 2011, a woman named Pam Anderson allegedly (according to
FFCHS) committed suicide only a few months after joining the board of
FFCHS.
4) As
early as August, 2013, Aaron Alexis was allegedly (according to
FFCHS) in direct contact with FFCHS board members. He allegedly
(according to FFCHS) continued to communicate with them up until only
a few days before he went on a shooting spree at the Washington Navy
Yard and then killed himself on September 16, 2013.
Now we
can add another one to FFCHS’s self-proclaimed suicide count…
5) On
April 5, 2014, FFCHS announced that one of its longtime board
members, Susan Watkins, allegedly (according to FFCHS) committed
suicide on March 31, 2014. Derrick Robinson has been trying to
promote this incident as a murder, based on extremely minimal
evidence that apparently (as usual) he and his organization are the
only ones who have ever seen it.
Aside
from the fact that I have seen no substantive proof to show that
there was even a suicide, this leads me to question how (and why)
Derrick comes to his conclusions so quickly.
Is it
because it strikes fear in the hearts of his followers and keep them
with his group? Is it because it supports the baseless claims of the
many followers of FFCHS who think they’re targeted but show signs
of everything from simple bad judgment to temporary delusion to
full-blown mental illness? (I don’t mean to discredit real TIs with
real issues based on their well-reasoned analysis of their
experiences and whatever legitimate information supports them.)
Is
Derrick Robinson trying to divert attention away from the destructive
nature of his cult group and the sort of material he promotes and
encourages his followers to believe, by crediting this alleged
suicide to some unknown murderer acting out for some unknown reason?
Is he
just trying to sensationalize this alleged suicide among his merry
band of cult followers in order to give them something that appears
substantial to hold them all together in the tight-knit and secretive
little group that they apparently are?
Or….
Is Derrick Robinson and his group involved in bringing people to the
point of suicide by drawing them into his group and keeping them from
understanding the true nature of their experiences until they give up
waiting for the solutions he constantly pretends he and his
organization can provide?
He
states in a recent newsletter:
“It's
incidents like this that underscore that what we are experiencing is
nothing short of a secret holocaust.”
If
there IS a secret holocaust going on, then appears to have its roots
at FFCHS. This can’t be denied. For Derrick Robinson to suggest to
his followers that Susan Watkins was murdered is nothing less than
fear-mongering, which is about all that he and his associates have
been known to accomplish.
One
further note at this point… Every one of these people I’ve listed
have very minimal or completely nonexistent online histories, so it
may very well be that some of them are made up personas, or they were
at least real people (still alive) using fake identities. I know that
John Turner was real, based on newpaper reports I dug up, although
his affiliation with FFCHS is only based on Derrick’s word, and
Aaron Alexis was real, as we all know, but again, his affiliation
with FFCHS is only based on Derrick’s word.
Heavy
pressure needs to be put on Derrick Robinson, Robert Duncan, Max
Williams, Timothy White, and others (newest one being Levi McCann) in
that group of ‘TI advocates’ stemming from FFCHS to prove their
identities and backgrounds.
Start
confronting them and demanding it.
Derrick
Robinson wants to suggest that Susan Watkins was murdered.
This
begs the question… If she was such a threat to those that
orchestrate these targeting campaigns, then WHY HAVEN’T DERRICK
ROBINSON AND THESE OTHERS BEEN ‘SUICIDED’?
As
I’ve said before, they all claim to be whistleblowers, but none of
them are targeted like a whistleblower normally would be, nor can any
of them point to any government body that they ‘whistled’ to, and
they’re even receiving hard-to-get attention in the mainstream
media. Outside of an Edward Snowden type of whistleblower who had to
flee the country, what real TI has that sort of ability to openly
function and get that amount of MSM publicity for so long without
repercussions???
I’ll
tell you who…
Liars.
Imposters. Double agents. Government infiltrators. Satanists.
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Sandy Hook's Disappearing Witnesses (reprint)
Friday, July 11, 2014
From The Memory Hole
By Tony Mead
Close to nineteen months have passed since the event known as the Sandy Hook Massacre transpired. Amazingly, there has still been no conclusive evidence put forth by any of the families affected or the investigators involved to dispel the many 'conspiracy theories' that have evolved from the event. In fact, new mysteries seem to expose themselves even more as time passes by.
From Douglas Cottle, who died Sept 29, 2012, at age 62 to Michael Bellmore, who died May 3, 2014 at age 27, more questions than answers seem to arise. The Connecticut State Police Commander, the Connecticut State Police Commissioner, the Western Connecticut State Police Commander as well as the Connecticut State Medical Examiner have all been eliminated from the story either by retiring or death. What better way to cover up any possibility of ever disclosing the truth? What better way to perpetuate conspiracy theories?
Perhaps the death of Douglas Cottle was an unfortunnate incident compounding the grief of Alissa Parker when she lost her daughter Emilie in the Sandy Hook tragedy. He was her father and the Grandfather of Emilie. He was a 62 year old dentist from Ogden, Utah who sustained serious injuries while participating in his ninth LOTOJA 206 mile bicycle race on Sept 9, 2012. According to his daughter, she thinks another racer may have clipped his tire, throwing him off the bike where he crash landed on his face. His face suffered over 30 fractures! Perhaps if repeatedly beaten with a tire iron, one could sustain 30 fractures. I find it highly improbable that a fall from a bicycle could inflict such injuries.(1)
Nevertheless, Mr. Cottle was sent to an 'elderly care' facility after being released from the hospital, apparently because the VA hospital was full. Mr Cottle was reportedly combative at times at the center as he repeatedly tried to rip out his feeding tube, despite their attempts to restrain him. He was uncooperative and reportedly tried to stand on his own, against the advice of his physician, which led to his falling down and sustaining yet another head injury. This time his injuries proved fatal and he died on Sept 29.
Was this a case of a terrible accident (there hadn't been a fatal accident in LOTOJA'S 30 years of racing), compounded by a lack of critical care rendered to an apparently healthy individual (prior to the race), or was it the apparent removal of a person who may have had foreknowledge and was unwilling to participate in such an endeavor as the Sandy Hook Hoax? From all of the nice things said about him in his obituaries, I truly believe this was a good man. His may have been the first of the many Memorial Funds yet to come to the participants from Ogden, Utah. You can still donate:http://dougsmemorial.org/Site/Welcome.html
At least in the case of Mr. Cottle, there is somewhat of an explanation as to the events and injuries that led to his demise. More recently, the death of William Podgorski, the CT State Police Western District Commander, who was also a Lead Investigator in the Sandy Hook incident remains unexplained. He died after a 'brief, undisclosed illness' followed by surgery on Monday, June 16 at Yale-New Haven Hospital at the age of 49. According to a friend of mine who had seen Bill Podgorski just a short time before his death, he appeared in perfect health. No further information has been released regarding this sudden death.(2) This Yale-New Haven Hospital was also the place where Reporter Michael Bellmore breathed his last breath on May 3, 2014 after being relieved of his duties as a New Haven Register journalist and reduced to a consultant to the Town of New Hamden. Judging from the credits on his obituary, this kid was a talented, aspiring journalist, who would never leave such an admirable job at the Register to become a 'consultant'.
Perhaps he was asked to leave. He was involved in the earliest reporting on the Sandy Hook shooting and was there on Dec 14, according to his Twitter Feed. He was also present when both Governor Malloy and President Obama addressed the city of Newtown in the aftermath. How does a 27 year old die so suddenly and inexplicably, and, again, in the care of Yale-New Haven Hospital?(3) Did he stumble into something he shouldn't have?
Some of the mysterious deaths occurring in the past 18 months are not as obviously connected to the Sandy Hook incident. Take for example JoAnn June Egletes, the secretary of Irving Pinsky, who was the attorney who initiated a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut for $100,000,000 on behalf of a 6 yr old child that was traumatized by the incident. Despite his acting on behalf of an affected child, he was immediately vilified, chastised and threatened. He even had gunshots fired through his office. He withdrew the lawsuit citing the need for further investigation. I wonder who would have the motive and the means (guns) to enact such an act of terror on his office.(4)
His secretary JoAnn June Egletes, died Sept 21, 2013, at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Again, I have yet to find an explanation as to the death of this 53 year old woman. It would sure be an effective way to intimidate Mr Pinsky from reconsidering that lawsuit.(5)
It sure seems odd that the deaths of Egletes, Podgorski, and Bellmore all occurred at Yale-New Haven Hospital as well.
These deaths supplement the other few mysteries surrounding Sandy Hook, such as the death of Scott Getzinger, who was the props manager for the Batman Dark Knight Rises movie (in which the map showing 'Sandy Hook was shown). He died after sustaining non-life threatening injuries in a car crash on April 7, 2012. The investigation of his death still has not been completed.(6)
There is also the case of Robert Hoagland, who went missing July 28, 2013 and has not been seen since! (7) He went missing when his wife was in Turkey for a 17 day excursion. With all of the mysterious $0 real estate transactions that have occurred and the odd number of homes owned by individual families and corporations, it is certainly relevant that Robert Hoagland was a Real Estate agent in Newtown. Despite various criticisms levied against Vision Government Solutions and their explanation that the zero dollar amounts assigned to various transactions was some sort of a 'glitch', they have since revitalized all of their data, and yet the zero dollar amounts remain!
I'm not sure why Robert Hoagland's wife was in Turkey when he disappeared, but it is quite curious when you compare that fact to the case of Phillip Marshall, the 911 Truther who mysteriously killed his 2 children before killing himself while his wife was reportedly traveling abroad in - yes- you guessed it - Turkey! (8)
The untimely deaths of some of these involved parties is accented by the removal of other key players who have removed themselves by retiring from their positions making them unavailable to be held accountable for the roles that they played. Wayne Carver is perhaps the most notorious of these participants. After threatening in 2011 to resign from his position, he abruptly changed his mind and agreed to stay on. After lobbying against the passage of Bill 1054 (the Bill to prevent the release of pediatric autopsies), he suddenly had a change of heart there as well and supported it's passage. As the awkward and sometimes imbecilic spokesman to the press, he will always be remembered for that famous quote- " I just hope that the people of Newtown don't have it come crashing down on their heads later."
Wayne Carver retired May 1, 2014, but has stayed on to help his successor and to complete his cases. He claims he also wants to stay on in a part time capacity. Seems like he's retiring without retiring completely.(9)
Next we have the State Police Commissioner Reuben F Bradford who shocked everyone by announcing his retirement prior to the release of the CT State Police Report on the Sandy Hook School Shooting. He was not very popular amongst the CT State Police as he and Danny Stebbins (the CSP Commander) were the first to receive a vote of 'No Confidence' from other State Troopers for the first time in it's 109 year existence in June of 2012!(10) Commissioner Bradford also headed up the States Emergency Services and was quoted as saying "The horror and unspeakable sadness of that day and the lives that were lost will never be forgotten," in a letter that accompanied the release of the long awaited 'Official Police Report'.(11)
Danny Stebbins, who was vilified for releasing information about the Sandy Hook incident at a conference in New Orleans that was apparently meant to be kept confidential, also announced his retirement. He will be gone at the end of June, 2014.(12) Gov. Dannel P. Malloy credited outgoing State Police Col. Danny Stebbins with guiding the agency through the "unimaginable" and difficult period following the Sandy Hook shooting.(13)
Both Stebbins and Bradford were Appointees of Gov. Malloy and were directly responsible for signing off on the release of critical evidence and information in the Sandy Hook Shooting!(14) Now that they are gone will they still be held accountable if it is shown that some of this information was incorrect?
Lt. George Sinko, who was working a side job directing traffic at a construction site on Dec. 14 and failed to report to Sandy Hook School until 2 hours after he was informed of the shooting, retired at age 49 in May of this year. He was reprimanded by Police Chief Michael Kehoe for his delayed response in 2012, but not severely enough according to his peers. When he was placed on administrative leave after an accident in April, he decided not to return to the Newtown Police force. Kehoe stated that he was "Not surprised" by Sinko's decision. Another one bites the dust.(15)
David Fein, the State's Top Prosecutor and Presidential Appointee also saw the aftermath of Sandy Hook as the perfect time to move on. Fein was involved with Eric Holder and Governor Malloy in implementing Project Longevity (a program designed to combat gun violence). He was also heavily involved in the investigation and pursued anyone who stood to capitalize on the deaths of those children (except, of course, the parents).(16)
Fein stepped up to the plate when a woman posing as the aunt of Noah Pozner was arrested for trying to solicit funds in his memory. "This arrest should serve as a warning to anyone who attempts to profit from this tragedy by contriving fraudulent schemes that exploit the victims, their families and individuals who sincerely want to help," said U.S. Attorney David Fein. (17)
Despite denying any wrongdoing and saying she was 'set up', Nouel Alba was sentenced to 8 months in prison and 2 years probation.(17) She had only collected $240 and reportedly returned the money. U.S. attorney Jonathan Francis argued for prison time, saying Alba's actions had caused emotional harm to the community and created a chilling effect on charitable giving.(18)
"It's a callous, calculating attempt to profit off the murder of children," he said. I guess the millions of dollars donated to the United Way and the Sandy Hook Promise are viewed in a different light.
Obviously, David Fein was serious!
So, as key role players in the Sandy Hook School Shooting continue to disappear, we are left to wonder exactly who, if anyone will be left to answer questions that remain unaddressed. Stephen Sedensky, the 'Lead Investigator' and J Paul Vance, the CT State Police Spokesman are two of the few that remain as the number of involved parties continues to dwindle.
If there is an attempt to conceal information from the Public, one of the most effective ways to accomplish that would be to remove the involved parties that have access to key information. Those that refuse to cooperate by retiring or resigning may be coerced or silenced in different ways. Here I have been able to cite only those parties whose stories have made it into the newspapers and local media. Who knows what other stories remain undisclosed to the public?
Another effective method of concealing evidence is to discourage anyone from asking questions in the first place. Remember that J Paul Vance, the CT State Police Spokesman said early on that anyone sharing 'misinformation' on Social Media would be prosecuted (19). What better way to control a situation than to make it illegal to disseminate information unless it comes from an 'Official Source'. This, despite the fact that all of the early information from Mainstream Media came from "un-named or anonymous" sources!
As time has passed, we have seen examples of the persecution of, if not the prosecution of, people that do question the Official Story. One of the most intriguing cases is that of YouTube videographer Scotty Walker (AKA Jonathan Reich). Jonathan was arrested in May of 2013 for allegedly making 'threatening' phone calls to the Coroner's Office as well as to certain families affected by the Sandy Hook Tragedy.(20) You can listen to his phone call to Wayne Carver's office here:
It seems to me that Jonathan has some pretty legitimate questions that should have been asked by any responsible journalist in regards to the Coroner's role in the passing of Bill 1054, which made it possible for the State to deny access to pediatric autopsy reports and is probably the most compelling evidence of pre-planning involved with the Sandy Hook Hoax. Dr Carver has never answered any questions regarding this, primarily because Jonathan was the only person with enough courage to ask him.
Dr Carver refused to even get on the phone with him, although he was obviously in the room with his assistant when the call was received. Jon also had contacted the Allison Wyatt Memorial Fund to ask them why they had mistakenly used the picture of Lily Gaubert to promote their fund raising efforts. Didn't anyone realize that they were using the wrong child's photo for nearly 2 weeks? Surely the parents had some involvement with their own child's memorial fund - didn't they?
Jonathan was then harassed by the local New York Police (where he lives) and told that he would be arrested and held on $250,000 bond unless he drove himself to Connecticut and turned himself in to be held on a lesser $50,000 bond. Because he was so afraid and didn't want to jeopardize his family, he complied. He has since spent nearly $50,000 on attorneys fees due to the fact that his hearing has been scheduled and then postponed at the last minute a total of 9 times so far. This sure seems a bit extreme for what is considered as a Class C Misdemeanor (the lowest of crimes) in Connecticut. (21)
More recently it has been revealed that a person could face detainment and even further punishment just for simply speaking about the possibility that all is not as it seems regarding the Sandy Hook story.
A school teacher from Pound Ridge, NY was recently accosted by police, taken to the hospital and involuntarily detained for over a week of 'psychological evaluations' where it was then determined that he somehow presented a risk to the community.(22) These allegations all came about as a result of his alleged online communications with an acquaintance on a Words With Friends App.
Whether or not this acquaintance reported directly to the FBI or whether his communication was somehow monitored remains to be revealed. Despite the subsequent findings that he is mentally competent, the Bedford School District terminated his employment on May 12, 2014. He has since initiated a lawsuit to get his job back.(23) Hopefully his lawsuit will lead to some legal discussion and a better understanding of the events surrounding Sandy Hook and the lack of disclosure.
History is being created before our very eyes. I encourage the reader to take the time to read the Wikipedia account of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting. There you will find a collection of nonsensical information that is presented as fact.(24) When we realize that laws are being written and society is being manipulated as a result of what happened on that fateful day, it becomes obvious that we have a responsibility to become informed of what actually transpired at Sandy Hook. After 18 months of research, the only thing that I am convinced of is that I do not know the Truth.
Notes
http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2013/05/20/new-york-man-arrested-in-connection-to-threatening-calls/
Tony Mead is co-administrator of the popular Sandy Hook Hoax Facebook page.
http://memoryholeblog.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)