_____________________________________________________
*EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS REQUIRE EXTRAORDINARY CAUTION*
_____________________________________________________
$1000 CHALLENGE -- $1000 CHALLENGE -- $1000 CHALLENGE
I will GLADLY pay $1000 CASH to anyone who can explain how a person’s thoughts can be read remotely at any time without the use of multiple implants placed throughout the brain.
Anthony Forwood <forwood@live.ca>
_____________________________________________________
"The Mother Of All Black Ops" website is putting out disinformation.
They claim that ‘brain fingerprinting’ can be used to remotely track people, anytime, anywhere. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE! RFID implants are FAR more likely being used, and are probably far more economical as well.
This site also claims:
“Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject's brain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing.”
This is equally UNTRUE! It is pure HYPE! It is physically impossible for brainwaves to be read remotely.
See the link at the bottom of this file for more information.
* * *
Apparently, Dr. Robert Duncan is making a similar claim, and promotes the idea that it’s possible to remotely read a person’s thoughts – but as a scientist and Harvard graduate, he falls short of using his intellectual capacities to explain HOW this is done. I have asked him to provide me with that information, and await his reply.
* * *
Note:
Remote Neural Monitoring is NOT the same as V2K. Monitoring is the act of reading/watching/recording activity. V2K is STRICTLY transmitting signals/voices/sounds TO the brain. There is no two-way communications going on. Similarly, ANY remote transmissions will be one-way TO the brain. Brainwaves are FAR TOO WEAK to be read from any distance beyond a few inches, and the complexities of doing so mean that even this is not a simple task!
See the link at the bottom of this file for more information.
* * *
On John St. Clair Akwei:
There are many stories and articles being circulated on the internet that I believe are purposely ‘loaded’, planted as seeds to lead people to believe that certain mind-control technologies exist when they really don’t.
For example, there is the case of John St. Clair Akwei, who claims to be a former NSA employee. Akwei filed a lawsuit against the NSA in 1992 for being targeted with what he referred to as ‘Remote Neural Monitoring’ (RNM) technologies. Although what has been posted on the internet about this case might lead one to believe that these technologies exist (hence the lawsuit), there’s nothing in these posts (particularly Akwei’s own claims) regarding this case that actually substantiates this.
Akwei provides nothing beyond his own very limited and unproven accusations – no technical data, no descriptions of the technology or how it might work, no information about whatever effects he suffered, etc. In fact, the whole case seems to have withered away without anything further coming of it. I read one post from someone who contacted him to find out the results of the case, and this person stated that Akwei wasn’t interested in discussing it and didn’t want to be bothered. The case had been dismissed by Judge Stanley Sporkin on the grounds that it was frivolous.
Obviously, Akwei either had no evidence for his claims, or the whole thing was a purposeful disinformation ploy orchestrated by his employers to mislead the public (and real Targeted Individuals in particular) into thinking that these technologies exist. I strongly suspect it was the latter. However, because he claims to have been employed by the NSA (which he probably was), and because he apparently went so far as to file a lawsuit, many people will automatically believe that this somehow gives his claims a lot of credibility. The fact is, virtually all employees of the intelligence organs are purposely misled or kept in the dark about anything they do not have a need to know about, and are often used (wittingly or not) as disinformation agents to muddy the truth. There is no way that Akwei or anyone else who had substantial knowledge of the truth would be placed in a position where they might be able to expose it. Akwei apparently had no substantial knowledge, and never even claimed to. His case seems to have been one based purely on assumption, or outright lies.
Google ‘John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA’ to read his court testimony and see for yourself. It’s all hype!
See the link at the bottom of this file for more information.
* * *
Author/investigator Tim Rifat also makes similar claims, but at least attempts to describe the technology to some extent. However, he overlooks the technical limitations of its capabilities.
* * *
See the document ‘A Primer on V2K vs. Mind-Reading Technologies’ at:
http://www.scribd.com/aforwood
It explains in comprehensive detail the capabilities and limitations of these technologies, based on hard science, rather than speculation.
PLEASE READ IT!
_____________________________________________________
*EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS REQUIRE EXTRAORDINARY CAUTION*
_____________________________________________________
$1000 CHALLENGE -- $1000 CHALLENGE -- $1000 CHALLENGE
I will GLADLY pay $1000 CASH to anyone who can explain how a person’s thoughts can be read remotely at any time without the use of implants.
How about it, Dr. Robert Duncan? John St. Clair Akwei? Julianne McKinney? Eleanor White? James F. Marino? Dr. Rauni Kilde? Tim Rifat?
Anyone at all?
Anthony Forwood <forwood@live.ca>
