More on the Bombing Scene (Site#2) - Part 2

This is a continuation of my analysis of the above photo. In my last post I established that this photo was taken just after bomb #1 went of and seconds before bomb #2 went off, and the location that it was taken was one short block west of site #2. Now, I want to follow this up and concentrate on the people we see in the foreground.

Starting at the far left, in front of suspect #2, we have MIT man (1) and the woman in black beside him (2). At center, we have the man in the toque with his back to the camera (3), and to his immediate right the older man facing to the left (4). On the far right, we have the running woman (5), who has been identified in post #1786 as Collier Clegg, and who claims to be a university student that just happened to get caught in the melee.

Some preliminary observations:

- MIT man’s right foot is flat on the ground, indicating that he’s walking.

- 2’s feet appear to be off the ground, indicating that she’s running. She may be with the girl next to her, and uninvolved.

- 3 is standing or moving about slowly.

- 4 is standing casually. He appears to be with 3.

- The cameraman and another person in a beige cap (lower left corner) appear to be with 3 and 4 as well.

- 1 appears to be looking either at 3 and 4, or at 5.

- 2 appears to be looking at 3 and 4.

- 3 appears to be looking back at either the first blast, or the suspects.

- 4 appears to be looking at 1 and 2.

- 5 appears to be looking at either 1 and 2, or at suspect #2.

- 1 appears to be in a serious mood.

- 2 appears to be grinning.

- 4 is definitely smiling and appears very calm.

- 5 appears to be smiling.

Just to note, I also notice that the girl running beside 2 has tears in her jeans. She may be with 2, and/or may be intending to play a victim at site #2.

What gets my attention more than anything else in this photo is 4, who is smiling away right after the first blast, and looking quite calm in spite of the panic in the background. He also has that ‘seasoned cop’ look about him.

In fact, all five have that ‘undercover cop’ look about them, IMO. Cops always dress a certain way (usually plain clothing), groom themselves a certain way, and act a certain way. They have very little imagination or style that reflects any sense of individuality when they’re on the job. They’ll usually be distinguishable by their coordinated clothing style and colors when working as part of a team – particularly where members may not know each other personally. They also have a habit of hanging tightly onto anything heavy they’re carrying when they run, as we see both 2 and 5 doing with one hand in their pockets. I suspect these are their radios.

Getting back to my preliminary observations, we can assume that 1 and 2 are not together. 1 has been walking along Boylesron just ahead of the suspects, while 2 and 5 have been running in parallel, moving in the same direction as the suspects. 2 and 5 have therefore come up from behind the suspects, and are now passing by 1, 3, and 4. 3 and 4 have been hanging around that spot, along with the cameraman.

Now, considering the likelihood that the cameraman was with 3 and 4, and that the appearance of 4 is as it is, I wonder about the reason why this photograph was taken. I suspect that it was intentionally taken to capture an image of the suspects near site #2 after the first blast, as part of their setup as the patsies.

I proposed in a previous post that there would have been two teams directing this operation, one at each bomb site. Just like we saw the mercenaries at site #1 both before and just after the blast, the team at site #2 would be located somewhere near that site but out of range of the blast, as we see with 3 and 4.

I also proposed earlier that the suspects were directed to walk the route they did, and I now propose that MIT man is their FBI handler, who may have been leading them on their route that day, or was otherwise stationed along the route to watch for them and make sure they did as instructed. To support the suggestion that MIT man is their handler, I offer the following images of what appears to be the same man during the manhunt:

 

 

Apart from the similarity in the hairstyle and facial structure, the most telling thing here are the shoes:

Note the color, the low-cut tops, the flat toes, the laces, and the shape of the sole – particularly the heal area.

I think we might have the same man being detained during the manhunt as we have in this photo of the street during the bombings. I want to discuss this further later on, but for now I want to stick to analyzing the scene in the first photo above.

We know that, for whatever reason, the suspects were chosen to be the unwitting patsies in this operation. They had a history of some kind with the FBI, and it’s possible that they had been recruited (or at least thought they had), with the intent to use them in whatever way they might be useful.

If this is anywhere near accurate, then an agent would have been assigned to act as their handler, being the only one in the agency that they would normally ever come be contact with.

I can only assume that the suspects were invited to tag along on this operation in order to “get their feet wet”. They would have been told to just follow instructions and not ask any questions. They may not even know their handler’s real identity. I’m sure that they were deeply involved with the FBI at the point of the bombings, and had probably been used to try to infiltrate Middle-Eastern or Russian terrorist cells. But they just didn’t have what it takes, and the FBI recognized this and decided to dispose of them. Thus the reason for using them as patsies in the bombings.

So I propose that MIT man is the suspect’s handler. He probably didn’t know at the time of the bombings that he’s helping to set up his protégés. He probably didn’t know that he’s involved in a criminal act at the time that the photo was taken. Like his two protégés, he’s expected to just take orders and carry them out. The same goes for 2 and 5, and possibly even 3 and 4. Only 1 really needs to know who the suspects are, but if 2 and 5 are involved as I describe here, then they would also know, but none of them would know that the suspects were being set up.

So let’s consider what might be going on in the first photo.

Just prior to the blasts, the suspects/patsies are instructed by their FBI handler (MIT man) to walk separately and follow him away from the marathon and head west. As they do, the bombs are set off, so that we see them here at Boyleston and Fairfield following MIT man just after passing site #2 and just before the second bomb goes off. MIT man has just made eye contact with his supervisor (4), who has been waiting for him to come along. This is a signal to proceed with the main plan.

The suspects have also been tailed by 2 and 5, who are now moving past them as they reach this point, while 1 is now signaling to 3 and 4 that the suspects have arrived. 3 and 4 have been stationed at that corner, waiting for 1 to come along and give the signal. The cameraman snaps a picture at the signal. He doesn’t know who the suspects are either. He’s just there to be the anonymous source for this incriminating photo of the suspects passing site #2 just before the second blast. 4 is supervising this part of the operation, being in charge of site/bomb #2. 3 is the man who actually triggers the detonation once 4 gives him the go ahead. Since 3 would have to know about the bomb if he’s the one who triggers it, his face may have been purposely hidden in the photo. 4, although he also knows about the bomb, is an experienced agent who poses little threat to later exposure, so he’s not quite as concerned about his face being seen in the shot.

Some clarifying points:

- 1, 2, and 5 know who the suspects are.

- 3 and possibly 4 don’t know who the suspects are.

- the cameraman doesn’t know who the suspects are.

This compartmentalization assures that the facts about the case can’t be easily put together so that no one is in a position to expose the larger operation.

I’ll stop here for now. In this post, I’ve made a number of observations that suggest that the people described in the photo are tied to the bombings. I might be right, or I might be wrong. Either way, there had to be something like what I’ve described going on to make sure that setting up the patsies was guaranteed, and this particular photo was crucial to that. If the suspects had decided to turn off Boyleston at Exeter (between #1 and #2) then the official story would be weakened. If anyone had taken a picture with them in it at some other location during this crucial time period, then the official story would have been weakened even further. I feel very strongly that this photo was taken by the feds themselves, and released to the public to convince them of the official story.

Anthony Forwood

More on the Boston Bombing Scene - Bomb Site #2

I’ve been studying the above photo, and there are a number of things I want to comment on. If any of this has been covered elsewhere, I apologize.

First, I wanted to determine where it was taken in relation to the two bomb sites in order to determine the direction that the suspects were walking, so I used the street sign as a guide and located Boyleston and Fairfield on a map. Here it is with the suspect’s location marked in yellow:

Next, I wanted to determine more precisely where in the photo the second bomb site was. To do this, I dug up the best shots I could find of bomb #2 going off, in order to locate any landmarks that I could coordinate with the first photo. Here’s the best two photos I have of the initial blast at site #2:

You can see in these two images that site #2 was just this side of the white building, which can be seen in the background of first photo as well. If you zoom in on that photo, you can see an American flag sticking out almost horizontally from this white building (see below). Looking at the first of the above two photos of blast #2, you can just make out the flagpole on the white building just behind the plume of smoke and fire. This gives a more exact idea of where site #2 is in the first photo.

 

The above image is a close-up of the area where site #2 is in the first photo. It’s pretty clear from this that bomb #2 hadn’t yet exploded when the photo was taken. The bomb is located on the curb just this side of the crosswalk (lower right corner).

Here’s another close-up with the approximate location of the bomb marked off with crosshairs:

We can see that a lot of people are on the sidewalk running away from the first bomb that has just gone off further down, and they’re passing directly through site #2 just as it’s about to go off, with the bomb on one side of them and the buildings on the other. There’s no one on the street anywhere near where the bomb should be. Take another look at the two photos of the explosion, and note that the flame extends out across the sidewalk where they are running.

We can see in the last image above that there seems to be something on the street at about the spot where bomb #2 is, but it’s unclear what. Here’s a view of the same area during the second blast, but from the opposite side:

 

Now we can see some things that weren’t clear in the previous images. The first thing to note is the ‘something’ on the street, and what appears to be debris from the bomb that extends in a narrow line out onto the street. This debris is in line with the mailbox and streetlight, but the smoke seems to be coming from somewhere a little further back and closer to the buildings. Also note that nobody is affected by any percussion from the blast, there are no smoke trails from jettisoned projectiles, and there is no disturbance of that ‘something’ on the street. The second blast appears to have been a carefully controlled one, just like the first.

This doesn’t mean that nobody was hurt. It just provides more evidence that #2 was a controlled explosion like #1. But considering the size of the initial flames, and the fact that people were running directly into them, I would assume that at least a few actually got hit by the flames and lost a few eyebrows.

Here’s a close-up of the crowded sidewalk at site #2 during the explosion. I’ve adjusted the image settings slightly to bring out the features as best as I can:

We can see that the sidewalk is quite congested, but nobody is taking to the open street, so there has to be a reason. If bomb #2 and resulting injuries were completely staged, then it would have been necessary to deal with the crowd running from bomb #1 so that they didn’t screw things up or see what they shouldn’t, so they were either stopped just before they reached site #2, or it was somehow triggered when there was a break in the crowd. The latter would be too chancy, so that leaves us with the only option that some people ran right through the explosion and suffered possible injuries from the initial flames. But that’s all, IMO.

I’ll continue with further analysis of the first photo in a later post, and focus on some other interesting details.

 

Anthony Forwood

Stage Hands and Actors at the Boston Bombing - The Brown-Shirted Girl

by Anthony Forwood

This is at the first bomb site, immediately after the blast. The brown-shirted girl is standing against the picket fencing, just observing everyone. The red circle shows what appears to be a camera or something that looks similar.

In this next image we see her taking or passing something to or from another person in the crowd.

here, we can see that this woman has something bulging in the front pocket of her pullover. She also appears to be signalling someone with her left hand. So is the black woman on the ground, covering 'Jeff Bauman'.

Here she is just hanging around at the scene. Why is she there? Is this normal for police to allow someone to just walk around a crime scene like this?

Here's another shot of her on the crime scene.

Here's another shot of her on the crime scene from a different angle. She appears to be either taking a picture or making a cell call.

Here she is apparently leaving the scene.

This collection of images is just one small peek into the many strange people and activities that earmark this event as a staged hoax. Please take the time to investigate the evidence that is coming out (thanks to independent researchers) that is exposing this for what it really is. Do not blow it off as a conspiracy theory without looking. The mainstream media cannot be trusted any more. Neither can your police and government.

To Those Who Doubt the Boston Bombing was a Hoax

by Anthony Forwood

Nothing that the corrupt actions your government engages in is meant to be simple to perceive, when they are intent on deceiving you. Even a little complexity puts most people off from looking very far or thinking too deeply…

Let me try to help you doubters understand how this hoax was pulled off. I suggest that those who doubt it was a hoax pay attention here and not be so simplistic in your thinking, and take the time while you read this to closely analyze the many available photos that reveal the clues … What I say here in this post is mostly regarding ‘Jeff Bauman’ and how the other crisis actors, police, doctors, etc., were kept out of the loop as to what was really going on. There is still much more evidence I could present to show that at least the first bomb was a staged hoax using the second (real?) bomb as a cover, but I want to try to keep this as short as possible. I will be more than happy to answer any questions that arise, since I’m sure that this one post won’t be able to cover every point to completely satisfy every doubter out there.

The first thing to note – and this is key – is that prior to the explosions, there were various announcements being made, including one by the Boston Globe that was posted on Twitter, stating that there would be a ‘controlled explosion’ in the area as part of a bomb drill. The Twitter announcement came just minutes before the explosions. Strangely, the authorities later denied that these announcements were ever made, although the Twitter announcement was captured by a user and posted online as proof of the fact that they were indeed made. Many witnesses at the marathon also heard the announcements being made over the loudspeakers and have attested to the fact.

 

How is this significant? The reason for the announcements was a preemptive measure, in case this psyop failed and the first bomb blast was discovered to be a staged event. Once the psyop was seen to have been successful (the crisis actors weren’t discovered by onlookers to be merely acting and using props), the authorities denied the earlier announcements. Both bombs would now be included as part of a terrorist plot.

Now, this ties directly into how this could be a hoax with so many people involved. Consider the fact that the people at ground zero of the first bomb site (the one at the finish line) were all knowingly part of this bomb drill, including police, medics, and the crisis actors playing the part of injured victims and witnesses. So there is no reason for any of these people to be ‘in’ on any conspiracy and cover-up. They were simply playing out a drill. For the most part, they had no idea at all that they were taking part in a hoax.

If you do a little online research (google ‘crisis actors’), you’ll discover that many of the different government agencies conduct practice exercises of emergency situations that are designed to be as realistic as possible. These exercises use crisis actors who specialize in playing injured victims. They also involve members of various coordinated agencies (FEMA, FBI, BATF, HUD, DEA, etc.), as well as medics, doctors, reporters, police, etc. They even hire extras to act as witnesses. All of these people are given their parts and are expected to act just as they would in a real situation. Therefore, they will even go so far as to have reporters interview the witnesses, rescue workers, doctors, etc. These people all know that it is a staged practice drill, but they must be as professional and realistic as possible, because this exercise is a test of their skills and abilities in a real situation.

But one very important thing about these exercises, in order for them to be as realistic as possible, and therefore provide the best test of the skills of those involved, is to not tell them anything more than that there will be an exercise drill. They will not be told that it will be a bomb situation. They will not be told exactly when or where it will occur, or how it will play out. The only people involved who will know these things are the crisis actors playing the injured victims, for obvious reasons.

Now, consider the fact that there was another explosion a few blocks away only seconds after the first one. What would all those involved in the bomb drill think later on when they heard the news on TV, other than that a real bombing occurred while they were doing their drill? They would believe that any reports of real injuries would have been from that second bomb. And perhaps there were some real injuries in that second blast, I don’t know. The point is, a second explosion at another nearby location would confuse matters enough that the authorities (with assistance from their media puppets) could get away with the staged bombing with all the faked injuries, which would have exceptional emotional appeal to present as a terrorist attack. You will notice that an attempt to try to find out who was hurt at which bomb site and how badly is almost impossible, since the media is purposely being very vague about this. Were ANY people seriously hurt by the second bomb? Was it just a percussion bomb? There are no photos available of that site, AFAIK.

Also, it needs to be realized that ANYONE might be used to play the interviewed doctors and surgeons who purportedly operated on the injured. Who would be able to say that what they claimed was true or not? Who could say that they were real doctors or just actors as well? Who could say that the interviews were real or part of a staged exercise? These are important questions to ask yourself if you are stuck on the idea that this couldn’t have been staged due to all the people involved. In reality, only a very few key players will be in on the big picture, while everybody else is dealt with on a need-to-know basis, and information about what is really taking place remains highly compartmentalized and tightly controlled at all times. Further to this, since this would be considered a secret operation, all involved parties who would be in on any critical and damaging information would have had to have signed a non-disclosure agreement or taken a secrecy oath, in order to guarantee they didn’t speak out or say the wrong things. This is a routine procedure these days, so it wouldn’t be all that unusual to be bound by a secrecy oath.

You also need to realize how hard it actually is to go public about something. The mainstream media is completely controlled and will not report what they are told not to report. If someone instead goes online to report knowledge of an inside job, they can be easily weeded out and incapacitated by blocking their abilities to reach a wide audience, so that although they might still be able to talk, only a few might ever hear them.

So, keeping a lid on what really took place and presenting the staged event as real was not such a problem, although anyone who doesn’t understand how the authorities use compartmentalization and secrecy oaths to secure delicate information would tend to think that people would talk. Added to that is the fact that the second explosion helped to confuse the situation, particularly for those involved in the practice drill who knew that the first explosion was staged.

Further to all this (and I really implore readers to look closely at the available photo evidence for themselves), if you closely analyze the photo images of the first bomb site immediately after the explosion, you can see that things just aren’t right. As soon as the smoke clears (which you can actually watch clearing in some of the photos, proving that these photos were taken immediately after the blast), you can see ‘Jeff Bauman’ on the ground with his ‘leg’ sticking up in the air. You can also see that there is absolutely no blood anywhere on his ‘leg’, on him, on anyone else, or anywhere around him. You can go through the images in sequence, half-second by half-second, for the first eight or so seconds after the explosion, and watch how two accomplices with this ‘Jeff Bauman’ help him to get set up with his prop ‘leg’, and only in the last few images do you finally see a small amount of (fake) blood as it’s apparently being spread around by one of the accomplices.

Not all images of the eight second period are provided here, but you can clearly see 'Jeff Bauman' with his two accomplices on the ground to the left side of the following photos.

The problem with this ‘Jeff Bauman’ losing both his legs and severing several major arteries in the process is that there should IMMEDIATELY have been blood, tissue, and bone shards all over the place, and judging by how he has his ‘leg’ lifted up in the air, holding it over the heads of his two accomplices, they should have all been literally drenched in blood. But THEY HAVE NO BLOOD ON THEM OR AROUND THEM!

In studying the photo evidence further, you can see that one of his accomplices, a black woman in a red jacket who was quite alive, conscious, and by all appearances unhurt immediately after the explosion, is later seen laying on a gurney and by all appearances playing dead with her eyes wide open and staring blankly. And there is a clue in this particular photo to indicate that this was indeed a staged event – a cardboard sign on the ground near the gurney says: “FIREHOUSE SUBS WELL DONE!”

 

So, although there might have actually been people who were injured or even killed, they would have had to be at the second bomb site. The photo evidence of the first bomb site shows no evidence of serious injuries, except for ‘Jeff Bauman’ and his ‘suddenly dead’ female accomplice.

The photo evidence shows that at least three people at the first bomb site were acting, although everyone there were certainly crisis actors, and this particular bomb can be seen to be nothing more than a harmless smoke bomb, perhaps with a few simultaneous directed explosions to add some damage to the surrounding fixtures. Carefully study the photos from immediately after the blast and you will fail to find much evidence at all that reflects a real tragedy just occurred at this site. No blood, scratches, scrapes, cuts, bruises, burns, etc., on ANY of the people at ground zero of explosion #1.

There is one particularly revealing photograph available online that shows ‘Jeff Bauman’ laying on his side at the bomb site after the blast, with his ‘leg’ quite visible with its shaft sticking out quite noticeably, and you can see that NONE of the rescue workers are paying him ANY attention, even though they are all around him dealing with the other far less ‘injured’ people. In fact, directly behind him you can see no less than four people leaning over his male accomplice. Why is that? Would you ignore the worst casualties and instead help the least injured first? This one photo says quite a lot. Also note that in this photo, the female accomplice is nowhere to be seen, although this was the location where all three of these people were laying in earlier photos. Where did she go? Why would they take her away if she was dead, while ‘Jeff Bauman’ laid there supposedly bleeding to death?

 

In another photo, you can see this male accomplice, in hoodie and sunglasses, leisurely propped up on one elbow, not appearing to be seriously hurt, and the female accomplice is also there next to him, quite alive and sitting up. But where is ‘Jeff Bauman’, who was between them? How can this female be missing from the scene in the photo of ‘Jeff Bauman’ laying on his side, and then in this photo both her and the other accomplice are laying there together and “Jeff Bauman’ is nowhere to be seen?

 

The clincher to the ‘Jeff Bauman’ lie is the ‘Jeff Bauman’ facebook page. This page shows a completely different ‘Jeff Bauman’ than the person seen in the photo images taken of the bombing aftermath. The ‘Jeff Bauman’ at the bomb site has already been identified as Lt. Nick Vogt of the US Army. Photo comparisons will reveal that they are very likely the same person. But the person on facebook who claims to be the ‘Jeff Bauman’ who lost his legs in this bombing looks nothing like either Lt. Nick Vogt or the man in the photos from the bombing. They are NOT the same person. The facebook ‘Jeff Bauman’ is an imposter collecting donations from gullible believers who would doubt that this was a staged hoax. There are a lot of simple-minded people out there who don’t have the capacity to see through anything of any complexity, who will believe whatever they’re told without any thought. I’ve heard that this facebook imposter has already received 100s of thousands of dollars in donations, so perhaps this is a new means for these government agencies to raise funds or to pay people off. Who knows?

One more thing that needs to be understood that is very important… the ‘Jeff Bauman’ from the bomb site was the person who identified the alleged perpetrators, claiming that they made eye contact just as the alleged perp placed the bomb on the ground at his feet. This means that the man acting as ‘Jeff Bauman’ in the bomb site photos would have been a key player in any psyop that was being played out. So would the two accomplices.

Osi Informers and Elizabeth Jane Buchanon Are Perps

by Anthony Forwood

According to the perp Osi Informers, Elizabeth Jane Buchanan claims that she was warned by security at the Vancouver Public Library about me at the time that I met her there. The exact quote that Osi Informers has posted from her is:

“When I was talking with him outside the library, a staff people saw us as the library closed. I was cautioned to be careful as he is violent and mentally ill. Guess they did not have the language to identify him as a perpetrator.”

Here is the screenshot that Osi Informers posted on facebook, which shows Elizabeth's comment:

This is a poor quality image here, but the original image can be found on one of Iso Informers' facebook pages at this link:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=392810347482932&set=o.119742251524556&type=1&permPage=1

My response to this is, only a witting perp who is active in the perp network and therefore allowed to receive watch list notifications would ever be warned about anyone on such a list. And since I was with Elizabeth Jane Buchanan the entire time I was with her at the library, and since nobody ever approached her the entire time, and since she didn’t ever take out her phone to receive a watch-list notification, then the above quote is either made up by her, made up by Osi Informers, or she IS a part of the perp network as I have already stated elsewhere and knew prior to meeting me that they have blacklisted me with the usual ‘violent’ and ‘mentally ill’ labels.

Whatever the case, I stand by everything I’ve said about Elizabeth Jane Buchanan, Osi Informers, and anyone else I’ve been able to identify as perps. The fact that all of them have consistently failed to answer for their actions towards me has been the real teller. I can even PROVE that the above quote is depicting a false incident, through email communications that I received from Elizabeth in the days before, during, and after that meeting with her. These communications will show that, although the content of her communications were quite strange, she did not reflect that view of me at any time, and THAT should tell you something.

But the most important point to make here is that apparently both Elizabeth Jane Buchanan and Osi Informers have taken a deeper step into the world of perp activity, spreading exactly the sort of rumors that perps normally do in places where I normally wouldn’t see them. This reeks to high heaven with perp tactics that every TI should be able to plainly recognize.

As for me, I’m willing as usual to stand up and answer for whatever I say or do, because I can back myself.

Can Elizabeth Jane Buchanan? No.

Can Osi Informers? No.

My accusations about them and anyone else I have questions about can redeem themselves by responding on my blog, but none of them will for some strange reason. They would rather act like the perps they are and use the usual unethical and cowardly practices that perps use to target people. The only reason I can think of why they would do this is BECAUSE I’M TELLING THE TRUTH AND THEY CAN’T DEAL WITH IT WITH INTEGRITY AND HONESTY.

More on One Peoples Public Trust, and Other Things

by Anthony Forwood


Okay, I’ve been able to confirm that OPPT is directly connected to ‘The Law of One/Ra Material’, and uses this ‘channeled’ information as the basis for their underlying cause. This is fairly clearly outlined at the following link:

http://americankabuki.blogspot.ca/2013/01/the-one-peoples-public-trust.html

So far I’ve been unable to find anything that would validate that OPPT actually knows what they’re talking about in a legal sense, or that any of their self-appointed trustees actually have the qualifications they purport to have. In fact, I’ve found nothing but deceptions and empty promises, such as with the above linked document, which claims to be a conversation with one of the trustees, Heather Tucci-Jarraf, but is nothing of the sort at all. The document also falsely leads the reader to believe at its beginning that it’s going to be (and I quote) “a discussion about how she got started investigating banking fraud and the events that led to her being invited into the OPPT as a trustee”. Again, it does nothing of the sort.

The same goes for OPPT’s supposed FAQ, which doesn’t really answer ANY questions, particularly those that I see people frequently asking them on their website (and getting no response to). Their FAQ is simply a rambling self-praising document about their supposedly great accomplishment and how we are now all ‘free’.

Sigh…

Whenever I start looking for answers that should be easily forthcoming from those who purport to have them, and I end up going on an endless paper chase, I know that something is more than just wrong.

In this case, like certain others before it, something very sinister seems to be afoot. I can’t quickly and easily explain any of the other cases I’ve come across in the past, but nevertheless this isn’t the first time I’ve encountered this same sort of intentional deception by people who pretend to be nothing but angels looking to save humanity from the evil PTB while actually attempting to draw people into a trap.

If nothing else, this case just adds more weight to my claims that the CIA is responsible for the channeled information that comprises ‘The Law of One/Ra Material’ (from which comes the whole STO/STS philosophy that you may have heard spoken of in some facebook groups). It also suggests that this is another program to identify and/or trap non-conformists to the NWO.

How is it that I continually find these connections by accident? Or is it an accident?

I started investigating the Ra Material when someone I know entioned their interest in it, and I was curious because I was already researching the connections between similar New Age channeling groups and the CIA, which I had been led to while researching the work of Andrija Puharich, which I had been led to while researching the US government’s remote viewing program, which I had returned to (I had already researched it out of a personal interest in psychism years before) after researching mind-control, which I had been led to while researching alien abductions, which I had been led to while researching the UFO phenomenon so long ago.

I could tell you all some stories…

I’m going to share one with you that relates to my suspicions about OPPT and other people and groups I’ve come across during my research. I hope that this will get across my concerns about what these sorts of groups might be up to. Please excuse me for the length of this. It’s something I actually wrote a while back but have never published before (AFAIR). I hope you’ll at least find it interesting.

I was going through material on the Philadelphia Experiment and the Montauk Projects a number of years ago, and in the process I learned that a man named Dr. Jack Pruett had apparently been involved as the metaphysical director in charge of the ‘Montauk Boys’ – a group of children who were used for their psychic skills and subjected to intense mind-control. I also learned than he had been in the Air Force, and that he was concerned about an alien invasion, but further digging came up empty, and there was nothing more that I could find on this man.

Then one day I was at the library looking through the books in the UFO section. Their supply of books on this subject had recently been dwindling to about half as many as before (purposeful elimination of information?), and all the remaining books were rather old, but there was one brand new book that I spotted, so I pulled it out to have a look. It was called ‘The Grandest Deception’, and it was written by a Dr. Jack Pruett. The name caught my attention, so I took it home and read it.

The book centers on the work of Zechariah Sitchin, which I’m quite familiar with. Sitchin is an expert on ancient languages and he wrote a series of books called ‘The Earth Chronicles’, which relate the translation of ancient Sumerian texts and what they reveal about the true ancestry of the human species and our creation by the Anunnaki gods who came to our planet from their own planet, Nibiru. Pruett’s book outlined what Sitchin presents, and then went on to show evidence in the Bible that the Bible is a deception created by the Anunnaki to keep mankind in slavery. I have no contest with any of this, after having done my own research into this for more than a decade. However, I was naturally suspicious, seeing that this might be the same man that was mentioned in the Montauk books.

At the end of his book, Pruett outlined his desire to form a group to defeat the Anunnaki plans for our future, and asked interested readers to contact him by email. I decided to do just that, so I sent him the following letter:

Hello Sir,

I came across your book, The Grandest Deception, at the local library and decided to check it out because I recognized your name, and was interested in learning more about who you were and what your book might be about. I had heard of a man by the same name as you in relation to a certain ‘conspiracy theory’ related to Camp Hero at Montauk, Long Island, and thought you might be that man. The only information I have in relation to this is that a man named Jack Pruett was said to have been the ‘metaphysical director’ of certain secret government projects that went on there in the 1970s and 1980s. Whether this is true or not, only you can tell me.

Irrespective of the above, I’ve just finished reading your book, and much of what you say in it I find totally compatible with my own views, based on years of personal research. I read The Earth Chronicles, by Zecharia Sitchin many years ago, and ever since, I’ve been engaged in a personal pursuit of the truth regarding our human history and the deceptions that have been played on our species throughout our civilized existence. I have recently published a book on the subject, called They Would Be Gods: The Past Reconsidered, The Future Forewarned (available at www.lulu.com). It’s based primarily on Sitchin’s work and the Old Testament Bible, but also delves into other related themes, most of them of a more contemporary nature.

As you obviously know, there is a great deal of deception in the circles of power that operate in our world. Much of that deception involves multiple layers of lies and half-truths, which have been fed to the masses by our own leaders and authority figures. I know on a personal basis how deeply the evil has reached into the hearts and souls of my fellow man, and I am reminded of it every minute of every day due to the circumstances that I’ve been put. For this reason, I’ve become necessarily suspicious of every person, and always question their deeper intentions and motivations before I can decide how far I might trust them. Your motivations sound very noble and altruistic, but because of what I mentioned in my opening paragraph, I’m somewhat leery of what your intentions might be, beyond what you state in your book.

However, I’m not writing to you out of suspicion, but rather because I’m very interested in what you’re attempting to do. I think that it’s a very necessary thing that you hope to achieve, and I would be interested in taking part in some way, if I were to qualify. Whether I do, I don’t know. I’m a naturally honest person, but I know that that can’t be taken on faith, as I can’t take your honesty on mere faith, either. This is something that can only be proven to each other over time.

As for whether I’m 100% convinced that I understand the truth of the Bible, that’s hard to say, because it’s somewhat complex in it’s wording and meanings, much of which I haven’t studied. In general, however, from what I have studied of it, I do believe that the Bible is full of both deception and truth, written by the Anunnaki in order to ensnare mankind in slavery, exactly as you say. In fact, you made certain things much clearer to me.

This is the deepest and most important issue that mankind might ever have to come to terms with, and the thousands of years of purposeful control and conditioning has led to the common habit of taking on certain prescribed beliefs that were contrived long ago by intelligences far greater and far more perceptive and cunning than any human’s, and these beliefs have since been deeply ingrained into our collective consciousness. For this reason, my own beliefs (which I will never claim to be absolutes) often fall into the habit of thinking in terms of that conditioning, and it’s a hard habit for any of us to break. The issue in question requires far more study than I have so far been able to give it, but I am working relentlessly on this every single day.

One of my major concerns about what is in store for us in the future is that the powers-that-be may be using this issue as a means for implementing their own agenda of a New World Order, and because of these concerns, I need to be very careful about who and what I will believe. There is much deception and double-crossing that has gone on for so long that it isn’t easy to discern what is true and what is not.

It’s a fact that the major governments of the world are developing certain technologies that could be used to stage an ‘alien intervention’, and it seems very likely that this is exactly what’s being planned for in the not too distant future. I refer here first to the US military’s Project Blue Beam, which is involved in developing satellite-based laser holography technologies that can create holographic images that are so realistic that they are indistinguishable from the real thing. These, along with certain other secret technologies, can be used to create the illusion of an alien invasion, a Second Coming, or whatever else.

Secondly, I refer to the existing HAARP (High Altitude Auroral Research Project) technologies, which have a variety of capabilities, including the artificial creation of extreme weather conditions and tectonic activity (such as we’ve been experiencing more and more in recent years), the induction of various emotional or physiological states on a large population (such as anxiety, panic, confusion, fear, aggression, disorientation, dissociation, sleep, etc.), and even the creation of a global-scale electromagnetic pulse (EMP) that will completely destroy every electrical component in existence along with all of the world’s electrical grids.

Third, I refer to the secret mind-control programs that have been ongoing since at least 1952 with the advent of MK-ULTRA, which was involved in developing and implementing techniques and technologies that provided the ability to take full control of another person, even without their knowledge, in order to program them as ‘sleeper’ agents’, who are turned out in various places and positions within society, ready to be used when needed for different purposes in fulfilling a secret agenda.

This is what concerns me more than anything with regards to you and your efforts, considering that there is a connection between your name and certain of these projects that initially took place at Brookhaven National Laboratories on Long Island, and later moved to the underground base at Camp Hero. I hope you won’t be offended by this reaction, but will instead understand the necessity to be absolutely certain whether you had any involvement in the secret projects, so that I (and others) will be able to decide whether or not your motivations are genuine, given the circumstances. You must understand that even though many people have worked in such evil programs, not all of them were aware of what they were involved in, or were working under the effects of mind-control, so they are not exactly guilty of anything. However, they must be considered as potential threats to the rest of humanity if they are still under control of the powers behind these secret programs. The secret projects that I have outlined offer the potential for a staged alien invasion, and with all of the disinformation that the major governments have been releasing over the years and decades, the possibility that what you describe as being a false scenario must be taken into consideration. I hope you understand this.

I am being honest by being up front about my concerns, and I only expect the same from you. I’m led to suspicion by the fact that there are very powerful secret societies and organizations that are playing central parts in this ‘Grandest Deception’ and are connected to these secret projects, and the fact that they commonly use ‘front’ groups (often preemptively) to divert efforts to counter their plans and agendas by attracting those who might seek to engage those efforts, and to frustrate or control those groups so as to make them ineffective. Because of this, I need to be certain that I do not end up involving myself in such a diversionary front group, and I can only find out by approaching you in this manner and see how things unfold.

Honesty must go both ways, and for my own sake and that of others, it must start with clearing up the matter of your name in relation to the Montauk conspiracy. Whether or not we really face the evil of an alien off-planet species, we nevertheless face an evil within the circles of power that exist on this planet, and that is what I would be willing to give my life to destroy.

I look forward to hearing back from you, and truly hope that I can join you in taking on this task to undo this incredible threat that the entire human species faces.

Sincerely,

Anthony Forwood

I received a quick reply, but I wasn’t very impressed.

Anthony, I truly appreciate your response. I am aware of the projects and agendas you have mentioned; but, I was not aware that a person with the same name that I have was participating in some of them. I do appreciate that information. I will simply say to you that it was not me. I sincerely hope that you will call me. I would like to develop our ideas further. Best way to reach me is by cell phone. My number is (409)550-8069. Feel free to call anytime that is convenient with you. 

What set me in doubt was the fact that, in spite of him being aware of the deceit within our governments and the true nature of these projects and the people who work within them, he showed very little concern about my suspicions. Further, he asked me to call him by telephone, which raised my suspicions even more, and I’ll tell you why.

Having been researching all that I have over the years, and in particular (at the time) my investigations into the Philadelphia Experiment/Montauk Project, I was coming across a series of parallel experiences that certain people have reported over the years that all tie in to secret projects similar to those claimed to have been conducted at Montauk. These parallel experiences involved childhood involvement in certain government projects that included ‘human enhancement’ and mind-control, and the creation of ‘sleeper agents’ and other types of ‘assets’. In a number of these experiences, some of these people were often drawn into these programs and/or otherwise kept in contact with their unknown handlers by telephone. In one particular case that I had been investigating at this time, the person (Dr. Jack Sarfatti) was initially contacted by telephone in 1952 when he was an adolescent, and by all appearances, was hypnotized over the phone by a computerized voice on the other end. Sarfatti has only ever been able to remember the first of many such telephone calls, but his mother remembered that these phone calls went on for three weeks until she intervened because she noticed the strange hypnotic effect it was having on him. He says that all he remembers was that the voice told him that he and certain others who had been selected would be involved in a special project in 20 years, There is much more to Sarfatti’s story, but to keep it short, at about that time in his childhood he became involved in a secret government program for gifted children, and then went on to receive the best education a person could get, studying directly under the world-renowned scientist David Bohm, and 20 years after the predictive phone calls, found himself involved in some revolutionary explorations into consciousness research with a number of people who’s names are now well recognized in that field. He also found himself helping with preliminary research that would lead to the US government’s remote-viewing programs ar SRI, when Andrija Puharich brought the Israeli psychic Uri Geller there to test and record his amazing abilities. That’s what got the RV programs their initial funding.

So to get to the point, when Pruett asked me to call him by telephone, I was immediately wary. I was already aware of such technologies as RHIC (Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control) and EDOM (Electronic Dissolution of Memory), which have been around since before Sarfatti’s strange phone calls. I was concerned because of the ties that I was finding between all these things – in particular the use of hypnosis over the telephone and Pruett’s possible involvement in mind-control programs.

In his book, Pruett had spoken about the need for complete honesty by all of those who would join him in his endeavor. I had mentioned in my email the need for him to be just as honest, and I would have thought that he would see the reason for my bringing up the matter of his name in relation to Montauk. So I responded to his email with the following:

Dr. Pruett,

Of course there are others with the same name, and there is very little that is said about this particular Jack Pruett. Also I don't necessarily hold anything against that Jack Pruett, since the Montauk Project was deceiving its own workers. It may not have even occurred. I'm just bringing it up because of the possible connections to what you are attempting.

Can you give me some background about yourself, particularly in relation to the time period of 1970s -1980s? This would allow me to feel more certain that you are not the same Jack Pruett.

As it is, I don't have a phone, I have very limited means of communications at all, and would rather keep it that way. There are things that I am involved with (involuntarily) so that I keep myself more secure by not having easy access to me or my location through technology. Have you ever heard of gang-stalking? I am a target of that, and probably have been for most of my life. This has reduced my abilities to function in society tremendously.

My concern was that, if he was the same Jack Pruett that was involved in Montauk, he was undoubtedly an intelligence asset who may have been attempting (wittingly or not) to set up a diversionary tactic to draw in those people who would oppose future efforts of the PTB to implement the next and final stages of their agenda for a New World Order.

(This is where my concerns about OPPT come in.)

Some might laugh and think I was being paranoid, but that’s not the case at all (even what came next failed to unnerve me). I was merely being careful, while at the same time following an intuitive hunch. You can’t discover the truth unless you follow where the clues lead, and see what results from it. But you still need to be careful.

I should clarify that my concern about telephoning Pruett (and my concern with exposure to communications technology in general) is that, with the advances that have been made in electronic hypnosis and mind-control, it’s very easy to be subliminally programmed without ever knowing it. Sarfatti didn’t know about his strange calls until 20 years later when his mother reminded him, and even then, he could recall very little about them. Other questionable people I’ve come across in my research have also sought to engage me over the phone, and only very recently, I was told that one of these questionable people, Magnus Olsson, was only willing to discuss his extraordinary claims about mind-control technology over the phone, rather than through email or on facebook. I’ve been invited by others as well who I’ve wanted to question about their claims to discuss them over the phone or by other audio means, and I’ve politely declined each time for the same reason. For some reason, these people all have a problem with text-based communication, which is far safer.

Whatever the case, here’s how Pruett responded to my second email:

From 1974 until about 1991, I was the medical partner of Dr. Ron Paul who is now running for President for the third time. He is by far the most honest and sincere patriot that this nation has had in my lifetime. If you have Internet connection, go to my website:  www.the grandestdeception.com for more. 

I did a little further research into who this Jack Pruett is who wrote this book, and I’ve discovered that he’s an obstetrician and gynecologist, meaning that he specializes in pregnancy and childbirth. This, of course, relates to genetics, and genetics is an important field of science to the Illuminati/mind-controllers/NWO boys. And of course, the Montauk Projects were specifically involved with children (the ‘Montauk Boys’) who had special genetic traits. His professional qualifications would have placed Pruett in an ideal position for selecting subjects for the various secret programs that those working for the PTB have been running, including those at Montauk. The fact that he had close ties to a senator and then-current presidential candidate leads to the possibility that he might have been attempting to set something up in the event that Ron Paul was elected.

Anyway, moving on, this was my response to Pruett’s last email:

I had a look at your website, but saw nothing that makes me feel any better. Not much there at all, really. Since you are interested in complete honesty, however, why don't you set up a message board, and allow me to voice my concerns, and you and others can join in and respond to them, in a way that all can see? That would be very fair and would clear up any possibility that you aren't the same Jack Pruett.

BTW, I did some more checking, and I see that you're a gynecologist and obstetrician, meaning that you deal with childbirth, which is too close to the interests of the American fascists who run these mind-control programs. The Montauk Project (Project Phoenix) was specifically dealing with young children, and was very involved with genetics. This places you in a very suspicious light, Jack.

Do you understand the reason why I would be concerned, and about calling you on the phone? 

Imagine that someone had worked for certain not very nice government entities (CIA, NSA, whatever) in a secret project that entailed taking children (often involuntarily) and putting them through very advanced mind-control programs that stemmed directly from the Nazi experiments of Dr. Joseph Mengele and Ernst Rudin. Imagine that those experiments involved high-tech and used hypnotism, trauma-based MPD to create alternate personalities, etc. Imagine that this person later continued their secret involvement with those government entities while presuming to lead a normal life. Imagine that they had at their disposal some of the high tech gadgetry and know-how to continue with certain mind-control operations. Imagine that their intent was to locate and subvert those people who would most want to stop the secret Anunnaki (Illuminati) agenda.

A telephone can be used very easily to quickly hypnotize a person on the other end, give them a post-hypnotic suggestion, and literally have them under their control from then on. I've studied this extensively and know how easy it would be to do with the right technology. That's why I refrain from using a telephone to call you, and why I am suspicious that you asked me to. This hypnosis and programming over the phone happened to the quantum physicist Dr. Jack Sarfatti in 1952 (google him if you must), when he was 13 years old, which he writes about in his book 'Destiny Matrix'. He was soon after involved in such a program for children. He later realized that it was a long-term plan that led him to work with many CIA, NSA people (Harold Puthoff, Russell Targ, Andrija Puharich, etc.) in advanced secret projects related to mind-control. It has happened to others as well, who report what they remember of their experiences.

The CIA is known to be involved in setting up front groups. I question the real purpose of this group you wish to organize.

Sorry... I just got hacked.

My computer is acting up.

This is exactly why I worry.

To explain that last bit… At that very moment, as I was writing the email, the computer I was using at the library suddenly began to act very strangely – the keys on the keyboard were doing the wrong things, and everything I was typing was being printed backwards on the screen, from right to left, making it very difficult to compose the email, to say the least. I sent off what I had been able to write and logged off.

At this point, my gang-stalkers also began to creep out of the woodwork. As I continued to hang around the library, looking at some of the books on the shelves, I started getting more dirty looks from strangers than I ever had before, and some of these people were making it quite obvious that their attention was on me. I just shrugged it off, finding all of it rather amusing, knowing that all this weird activity was intended to scare me, which it didn’t. I knew that fear was a way into a person’s mind, so I wasn’t about to open up to it.

I should note here that the Jack Pruett that was involved in Montauk was apparently concerned about an alien invasion, as I said before, and the Jack Pruett who wrote The Grandest Deception was concerned about this same thing, which had led him to writing his book. They certainly seemed to be the same person, all right. The coincidences were just too great.

Later on, I logged back into my email account to check my mail. There was another response from Pruett. It was short and glib:

“I feel no need to try to defend myself. I applaud you for being suspicious; however, there is no privacy in our world today. You have many avenues at your disposal to check me out. Feel free to do so.”

In thinking about all this, I began to wonder about the forces in our society and their deceptive manipulations. Was this Jack Pruett working for the Illuminati/mind-controllers/NWO boys? Did he reject Jesus Christ because he (Pruett) was a Jew? Was he in fact a Zionist Jew, which is what the Illuminati are said to be? Could he possibly even be tied into this gang-stalking program, and had he sent out an order to increase my harassment while he remotely watched me typing that last email? His final response had left a possible subtle indication that this was the case – “there is no privacy in our world today”.

Or, was this Jack Pruett just incredibly naïve to think that my concerns were inconsequential, and didn’t deserve a serious response, considering what he claimed to be attempting to do? I seriously doubt it, considering both what he had written in his book and what my suspicions of him were at this point.

So, that’s the story I wanted to relate.

Pruett’s book made out that the threat to humanity was future alien invaders – the Anunnaki of ancient Sumerian legend – but he completely ignored the more immediate threat of the PTB, of which he claimed to have ties to through Ron Paul (you must realize that no candidate for US presidency ever gets that far unless they are entirely owned by the PTB). The Anunnaki might as well be the channeled entities who dictated the Ra Material, since the latter also claim to be our benevolent masters seeking our loyalty. And this leads right back to the OPPT and the basis of their cause, as is clearly indicated in their literature.

As a final word, this is why I warn against certain commonly held beliefs among the TI community or following the high-profile online personas who promote them, because these people are apparently ALL dealing from the bottom of the deck, and it becomes quite obvious when you look closely at what they claim or try to question them about it. It’s always the same basic strategy and methods of deception that they use. And the fact that so many of them want to only discuss anything through audio communications is extremely suspicious, as I think I’ve made clear. I would also like to warn TIs about watching online videos, particularly those put out by any of these high-profile personas, for the very same reasons. But that’s up to you. Just take note that I NEVER do, and I’m completely free of any of the problems that so many other TIs are having that are related to mind-control and electronic harassment. I intend to keep it that way. No cell phone, no internet connection to my computer, no watching or listening to online audio or video presentations, and no believing anything without concrete certainty that it’s as true as is claimed. These are all methods used to initiate and maintain mind control on you.

Be wise, stay safe, be strong!