tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post1346105410616345279..comments2024-02-28T01:09:30.423-08:00Comments on Exposing the Truth: Exposing Julianne McKinneyAnthony Forwoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comBlogger56125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-13997293909549123082017-02-19T20:12:39.959-08:002017-02-19T20:12:39.959-08:00Julianne was one of the first people I connected w...Julianne was one of the first people I connected with on FFCHS. She was so rude and dismissive that I had to disconnect from her completely. She is not in these groups to help.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-24641565210406641212016-11-17T13:32:27.739-08:002016-11-17T13:32:27.739-08:00Robert Tevault, I can agree with all of that, exce...Robert Tevault, I can agree with all of that, except the part about people's thoughts being read. That one point is what leads so many to NOT want to believe any of this targeting goes on, whenever that particular claim is raised. <br /><br />It's foolish to just assume that one's thoughts can be read so easily, when the technology really doesn't support such a thing and there are other more plausible means for monitoring and assessing a person's inner thoughts and inclinations. They would like you to ignore these more plausible means while entertaining the more outrageously unlikely idea that they have the ability to look into your mind and watch it like a movie. It keeps people distracted from the real source of the problem. <br /><br />That claim is a planted SUGGESTION, which if you're open to the idea, is the beginning of hypnotic induction -- moulding a reality that you will then begin to substitute for the real one. It is meant to keep you making the wrong assumptions and leading you deeper into this false reality where you will feel far more incapable of dealing with the issue than you would if you understood how they were really assessing you and causing you to think they were in your head. <br /><br />Encouraging others to believe such technologies exist is the devil's work. It encourages self-defeat, in that a person who adopts that idea will feel weaker rather than stronger, incapable of even trying to deal with their situation because they think it's beyond their ability to do so. They will eventually give in to it, and either become "one of them", or lose touch with reality altogether, believing in that false one where others can look inside their mind and manipulate it so easily. <br /><br />Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-75282969963138213062016-11-16T14:48:46.103-08:002016-11-16T14:48:46.103-08:00People who are enrolled, voluntarily or through en...People who are enrolled, voluntarily or through entrapment, will always discredit a legitimate target's victimization; indeed, they often infiltrate the person's life (or a community) to do just that. Another sure sign of the enemy is they will in no way help a target escape, as in helping them financially,securing legitimate legal representation, etc.<br /><br />The combination of synthetic telepathy (having access to a victim's thoughts, and therefore being able to pre-empt, and sabotage their plans), surrounding a victim with enemies (appearing as allies) who discredit their enslavement, keeping a target financially destitute, electronically egregated and exhausted physically through electromagnetic radiation torture is a system of enslavent. It is ongoing, constantly refined and meant to spiritually conquer any individual - particularly the most defiant. A few references can be found in the infamous "Report From Iron Mountain" and somewhere in 'Technotronic Dictatorship' by socialist devil Z. Brzezinski. The Satanic, occult dementia which informs this anti-human agenda is most disturbingly revealed by mad genius Manley Hall's "The Lost Keys of Freemasonry," which contains masterpiece quotes about the 'seething energies of Lucifer,' ruling the lives of others, and Osiris as messiah. Everyone should read Freemasonry's classic texts in order to understand the worldview, efficiency and madness of that particular devil cult.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00850777959743429649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-91108991681316089832016-10-03T23:09:45.163-07:002016-10-03T23:09:45.163-07:00Heads up!
FFCHS has since changed its name to PAC...Heads up!<br /><br />FFCHS has since changed its name to PACTS International (People Against Covert Torture & Surveillance, International). It's still headed by Derrick Robinson. Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-22560694538756085442015-12-25T15:14:00.268-08:002015-12-25T15:14:00.268-08:00Right, she's programmed to push people's b...Right, she's programmed to push people's buttons, but don't let your buttons get pushed. Do whatever the op tries to get you to stop doing. If the op wants McKinney to agitate you off the forum, then do the opposite, stay on the forum. You'll be helping our cause and your own cause.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-75427870481246542012015-12-24T02:28:50.813-08:002015-12-24T02:28:50.813-08:00McKinney is dangerous. She's programmed to pu...McKinney is dangerous. She's programmed to push people's buttons; people fall for it and defend their life stories. Meanwhile, data is taken which helps her programmers to understand how to manipulate the human psyche to reach their experimental goals. Best is just to stay off McKinney's path; she's a dispensable scout, that's all she is. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-36592867914777530152015-06-30T18:25:12.287-07:002015-06-30T18:25:12.287-07:00Ignoring her and being polite to her are at odds.....Ignoring her and being polite to her are at odds.... I just totally ignore problem people now. Responding to them at all is just an invitation for more of their crap. But I agree about staying on the forum and not be intimidated by such people. Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-31924983011151760202015-06-22T16:42:53.877-07:002015-06-22T16:42:53.877-07:00The key to fighting McKinney is STAY on the forum....The key to fighting McKinney is STAY on the forum. Do the opposite of what she and the govt want. If they want you off the forum, it must be in your best interests to stay on. So I say to all not banned from the forum, go on the forum, and be very polite to her, and ignore her. Use the forum to post your story, names, dates, plates, descripts, and, like Anthony, become known.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-55162907536829655272015-06-20T19:33:13.268-07:002015-06-20T19:33:13.268-07:00She is an obvious perp. I describe what was happen...She is an obvious perp. I describe what was happening, she calls me sensitive and says that it's not gang stalking and people don't have that much time, I call her out on some of her shit and give her ego a little jab. Then she emails me and we exchange emails and she denies saying stuff that I and everyone else read, says I need help, and bans me from the forum.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-33253299666043294912015-06-09T13:31:44.415-07:002015-06-09T13:31:44.415-07:00Thanks Josh.... I don't really spend a lot of ...Thanks Josh.... I don't really spend a lot of time reviewing videos by unknown people, just because I could be doing that for the rest of my life and never see an end to them. If there are particular people who stand out for their volume of questionable material and the negative effect it appears to be having on TIs, then I'll take notice. But I'd really rather put my investigative efforts to the bigger, stinkier, and more recognizable fish who are floating around the TI community and polluting it with their government agenda. Bottom feeders who follow their lead are a dime a dozen around here. <br /><br />I copied one of the videos and the comments for later review (Cynthia from New Mexico). Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-12971101561342368102015-06-08T14:10:15.232-07:002015-06-08T14:10:15.232-07:00Just a suggestion, you should do an article on the...Just a suggestion, you should do an article on the GS disinformation videos on Youtube. If you Google "Gang Stalking" videos I've commented on should come up on the first or second page. From there you can link up with my account and find yourself a whole pile of disinfo videos.<br />-- JoshAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-80351106422943771022015-05-03T11:23:14.693-07:002015-05-03T11:23:14.693-07:00I just caught this comment by Debbie Newhook, anot...I just caught this comment by Debbie Newhook, another FFCHS member who lies and twists things to make a stink... <br /><br />Debbie, I don't see Josh Copeland or anyone else "slamming" you "the fifth time" on this page... He didn't even post here until January 2015, four years after you came and snvelled! <br /><br />There must be a very good reason for people "slamming" you, Debbie, and I know it isn't for the same reasons you and your group slam me and ban me from your little cultish groups... for revealing the truth about FFCHS and their partners in crime....<br /><br />Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-87246105552247705872015-02-26T13:26:31.665-08:002015-02-26T13:26:31.665-08:00I tried commenting earlier but it didn't save ...I tried commenting earlier but it didn't save for some reason...<br /><br />Thanks for your further input Josh... A lot of people read this page, so what you say is reaching others. <br /><br />I'm tempted to go back on Multistalk, just to see what happens. <br /><br />I was run out of all the FFCHSW groups on facebook for asking questions and pointing out certain facts about certain people there, after receiving pretty much the same treatment as you. <br /><br />They thought that by silencing me, they would stop people from hearing what I have to say. But they went on to harp about me being a fake TI and a government agent (you know how they mirror themselves onto others) and that just caused people to search me out and see what I have to say... which has obviously hurt their reputations further, given the apparent credibility my work is gaining. <br /><br />I'm tempted to rejoin multistalk, just to see how Julianne reacts. I bet I would be blocked, if that's possible. Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-1225288787854074342015-02-19T10:20:02.394-08:002015-02-19T10:20:02.394-08:00Josh here. Wow. I didn't know anyone was readi...Josh here. Wow. I didn't know anyone was reading my posts about Julianne and Beth and Bruno. Esp. on alt.private.investigator. I thought I was typing in the dark. Here I have cut and pasted my comment from an interview with Julianne on Utube:<br /> <br /><br />Disinfo is truth mixed with lies. A lot of what McKinney says seems plausible, so I don't want to deny what she says. So I say give her credit on that. But...she is a disinfo agent. She heads the Yahoo forum Multistalk. My theory is, that when the internet came around, the govt was worried it would help TI's band together and make themselves public, so the govt put its own people in charge of the forums and groups. Julianne would act obnoxious as hell -- and I mean obnoxious, not the woman U hear on the video -- to harass real TI's off the forum. TI's left the forum in droves. Most could not stay on it for long (I was on it for about 4 yrs because I just ignored her). This was her job set out to her by the govt. The forum had many people claiming to be TI's, but they would just act rude and ignorant too, to agitate real TI's off the forum. Julianne was nice to them (The agitators). I tried to get to all the TI's that left and tell them to ignore her and stay on the forum. I emailed this to one dude, I told him that Julianne agitates people off on purpose. And he sent my email to her. Then she, and many of the members put in a concerted effort to harass me off the forum big time, like a huge campaign. All of a sudden it seemed every post was directed towards me, telling me to get off the forum. "Felix TI" threatened to find me, saying he knows where I hang out. Even the TI I tried to help did his part in trying to push me off the forum. But I wouldn't leave. So Julianne claimed I wasn't who I said I was and kicked me off. Also, Julianne can act like a loon in public, to try and discredit REAL TI's. In her comments to Sharon Weinberger's article on GS in the Washington Post, she, Julianne, kept commenting over and over, claiming the Post kept deleting her comments (Which it did not). If U R a TI, U should make your situation as public as possible, as hard as that might be...<br />--Signing off from 1332 Pinyon Ave, Grand Junction, CO 81501...<br />--Joshua Copeland<br /> <br /> That's the comment. Anyhow, when I tried to post about Julianne on the FFCHS forum, the forum moderator deleted them, and Derrick Robinson, the head of FFCHS -- a former NSA man himself -- threatened to kick me off the group. When I referred the forum members to my alt.private.investigator posts, Batvette derided me for posting all that (A real TI wouldn't abuse U for posting what I posted on alt.pi).<br /> Anyhow, the key to getting back at Julianne is to go on Yahoo Multistalk, but don't let her agitate U off. Just don't tell her I sent U. Do the opposite of what she wants. The govt must have good reasons for wanting to keep TI's from posting there. So post there. Just ignore her. I stayed on that forum for 4 yrs, I just ignored her posts. I think she's a counter intel agent with a handler and everything. Also, try the site Fightgangstalking.com (There's no "WWW" in the name). It has a lot on disinfo. And watch out for all the disinfo on Utube, with agents who act crazy (Chokah Mohab, that's you) on purpose to discredit real TI's. There's so much of it, I try and comment on all of it, trying to negate it, but the videos are so numerous...<br />--JoshAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-74990135420702621122015-01-17T15:31:45.866-08:002015-01-17T15:31:45.866-08:00That;s you in the video? Why do you have a court o...That;s you in the video? Why do you have a court order to stay away from this person? I saw nothing in the video that would ptove any sort of gang-stalking.... just a person who was attempting to break a court order rather than to take the proper avenues. Sorry Johm. Not impressed. Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-21723130371214877832015-01-09T13:52:06.130-08:002015-01-09T13:52:06.130-08:00(Repost)
That article reflects exactly the same ...(Repost) <br /><br />That article reflects exactly the same characterization of McKinney that I and many others have commented on. I find it very interesting that the MUFON article came out one year after McKinney's own article, which appears to have been intended to give the then barely-developed TI community some substance. At that time, the UFO community was well-developed while the TI community was not, and the latter actually developed out of the former and became recognized in its own right. These are both audiences for various psyops, and I would think that as such, it was important at the time that the MUFON article was published that a distinction needed to be created between them, dividing out the TI community from the UFO crowd, which is in fact what has since happened.Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-21731023661241876352015-01-05T13:09:18.086-08:002015-01-05T13:09:18.086-08:00I have paid a very heavy price for having trusted ...I have paid a very heavy price for having trusted one of those whose defence of Julianne is quoted on this page. (Search for "Please, miss, please may I watch my son's school Christmas play?") However, I still maintain that trying to work out whom one can trust, without taking into consideration what you are trusting them to do, or not do, with what potential good or bad consequences. Applications for trust, are like applications for credit. Each such decision all depends how much "money" (or trust) you want to "borrow" (or use), this time, as well as who you are and your track record.JohnAllman.UKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08103168230712387293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-80440147353121568382014-10-20T16:23:32.606-07:002014-10-20T16:23:32.606-07:00Has anybody ever heard of Ann B. Livingston? Her ...Has anybody ever heard of Ann B. Livingston? Her highly critical account of trying to deal with Julianne are written up in the November, 1993 issue of Mufon Ufo Journal 'electronic harassment and alien abduction'. You don't have to be a Ufo buff to recognize the disrespectful gas-lighting and discrediting of information the recovering army intelligence officer actually never even examined in the first place - nor to appreciate the frightening implications of the fact that Ann died from a sudden aggressive ovarian cancer in 1994.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06598466623446644327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-14784168708735759932014-08-10T17:35:46.249-07:002014-08-10T17:35:46.249-07:00In reviewing the comments to this article three an...In reviewing the comments to this article three and a half years after having written it, I can now say from personal experience that those people who have posted comments in support of Julianne McKinney have shown themselves to be equally suspect (Ken Wilbourne Jr., Debbie Newhook, Paul Stayton, etc.), not because of their complaints about the claims made by myself and others here and the evidence presented against Julianne McKinney by way of her own words, but because of how they’ve been incapable of providing any evidence to support their denials of what has been said about her, as well as because of claims they’ve all made elsewhere in the past about themselves that they wouldn’t provide enough details on to validate them when asked, and most noteworthy of all, because of the very close and continuous association all of these people have had with government agent Derrick Robinson and his FFCHS cult group throughout the time since I first posted this article in 2011 and even prior to that, which I wasn’t aware of when I first posted this. <br /><br />What I find so hypocritical about them all is that although they excuse Julianne McKinney’s nastiness and skepticism towards those TIs who have come to her forum for help (as shown above in both my article and in Joan’s comments), these supporters of McKinney (and McKinney herself) can’t handle the same suspicions about their own genuineness and take extreme offense to it and don’t even attempt to follow their own advice. Paul Stayton’s rather foul-mouthed rhetorical comments filled with false claims that I’m manipulating messages were not intended to seek validation for what I’ve stated about Julianne McKinney, but were instead intent on attempting to discredit me for even questioning her bad attitude towards TIs while posing as someone who was there to support and help them. I’d like to point out to Paul Stayton in particular that in the past three and a half years since I posted this article on my blog, my readership has increased dramatically, and continues to increase with each new article I post. The only people complaining about me are the people who are associated with the most questionable personas and groups operating in the TI community… the people I’m exposing based on FACTS. If any of them ever want to clear up these suspicions about their own integrity here in public, I have the questions ready for them to answer. <br />Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-76115974417591909642014-06-24T14:43:09.478-07:002014-06-24T14:43:09.478-07:00I delight in, result in I found exactly what I use...I delight in, result in I found exactly what I used to be looking <br />for. You have ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day.<br /><br />Bye<br /><br />Also visit my web-site: <a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Cut-Hair" rel="nofollow">loreal hair color</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-13416757408487039752014-02-03T12:56:18.494-08:002014-02-03T12:56:18.494-08:00Other readers can just look at who's been usin...Other readers can just look at who's been using MY blog to vent instead of just dealing with the issue that got their wet little panties in a bunch early on. I've been deleting this perp's continuous posts here since he started ranting about me like he's worried about what I'm publishing. But some remain to serve as evidence of his lack of maturity and utter perpiness. Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-46408114879448306302013-10-10T15:15:48.673-07:002013-10-10T15:15:48.673-07:00Well, I suppose you feel thanks should be in order...Well, I suppose you feel thanks should be in order now that you have backtracked and returned my previous messages to this blog page. Now wasn't that a sneaky little trick you played on me! For someone who proposes to be a seeker and disseminator of truth, you certainly have a very low threshold for being on the receiving end of ACTUAL critical analysis. It sure is a very good thing that your words don't carry overmuch weight on the web.<br />Let's put this in its proper perspective: <br />First you removed my above messages, and then once you thought it was long enough a period of time, you returned these messages just to make it seem like you had the almighty last word and that was that and that paltry Stayton guy was at an impasse and on the ropes. Finally!<br />And to add insult to your deception, you went and started up another blog page “dedicated” to me! You know, the same way you “dedicated” this page to Ms. McKinney. And you did it in such a sneaky, reprehensible way as to disinform me with a personal email so that I would think you actually went out of your way (in your typical condescending and overbearing manner of course) to try and clarify your position on the people you do so relish to obsess over. And all you really did was attempt to smear another person who saw through your inconsistency.<br />And here you were just setting me up with your petty attempt at an “exposė,” which was actually just one more of your tired “nanny-nanny-poo-poo” rhetorical rummages through the same old “my word is blog-law” UNSUBSTATIATED TALKING POINTS.<br />My, but you do have a nasty habit of shitting all over anyone who doesn't eat your shit, and then manipulating the shitfest to make it look like your just waiting at thew keyboard with bated breath to deftly and honestly respond to all those unanswered questions about where you actually get the nerve to continue masquerading your flimsy smears as honest journalism.<br /> I would advise anyone reading this who is witless enough to allow you to lead them by the nose headfirst into your myopic nearby trees that you insist are the entire forest to take a deep breath, and a step back, and observe exactly who this petty third-rate Alex Jones wannabe is. Please, everyone, observe how this vindictive sophist parades his insulated ivory-tower talking points with finger-pointing blog smears that help nobody, attempt to deceive anybody who browses, and set up the Undying Infallibility of the Great Grandstander Himself.<br />I'm pulling out all the stops, Chuckles. You have the unmitigated gall (yes, I'm aware I've used that descriptive on you already; but it just seems to fit so well!) to call people you don't like “perps” and “traitors” and whatever other moniker you've christened—which is really only the name of the next rolled up turd you spontaneously lay as you consider a brand new conspiracy theory to mount like your new bitch—and you never seem to find the time to just be nice to someone who's merely seeking more of an explanation than the UNSUBSTATIATED TALKING POINTS you're complacent to embellish.<br />Go back up to the top of this page and read Kenneth Wilbourne's message to you.<br />And please stop imagining that anyone you deign to accuse is what you say they are.Paul Staytonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08282649860718980531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-84710818880756636882013-01-16T15:58:34.323-08:002013-01-16T15:58:34.323-08:00Tell me, how is anyone supposed to substantiate an...Tell me, how is anyone supposed to substantiate anything of this nature. Only a dolt would think that this is supposed to be anything more than my own personal perspective. It's up to all of you readers to decide for yourselves what to make of it. <br /><br />I find it VERY interesting that you chose to come and respond at this point in time, when certain other events are happening around me that stem from such people as Julianne McKinney.<br /><br />Are you from FFCHS?<br />Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-24441992165402137282013-01-16T10:31:47.666-08:002013-01-16T10:31:47.666-08:00As you wish. You obviously need to vent, without t...As you wish. You obviously need to vent, without the obstruction of a reasonable challenge to your unsubstantiated diatribe. Good luck.Paul Staytonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08282649860718980531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5841189008940050801.post-29663913807185148302012-12-28T12:31:43.531-08:002012-12-28T12:31:43.531-08:00Enough of your holier-than-thou attitude. If you m...Enough of your holier-than-thou attitude. If you must imagine that uppercase is yelling, then I imagine that that's what you NEED to see it as.<br /><br />STOP USING MY BLOG AS A TOILET FOR YOUR CRAP. I deleted the other posts you came back and put up that are COMPLETELY irrelevant and UNWANTED.<br />Anthony Forwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15586654359814176758noreply@blogger.com